PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 9 Mathematics · Chapter 4, Exploring Algebraic IdentitiesPrepShorts

Chapter 4 · Exploring Algebraic Identities

Recognising an expression as an identity in disguise

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Identities as factorisation tools10 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

10 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

Factorising is not guessing until something works. Read the identity from right to left and it becomes a recogniser.

The idea

An identity is a two-way street, and factorising with one is a matching problem rather than a search. The two end terms of the expression decide what a and b would have to be — you have no freedom there — and the middle term is then a test that the candidate either passes or fails. That is why the method is fast and also why it is narrow: it recognises squares and nothing else. Example 7 is the chapter's admission of the awkward case, and its fix is the real content — when the leading term's square root is irrational, pull out a common factor first so that the candidates come out rational, and the same identity works again unchanged.

What you should be able to do

  • Given a three-term expression, propose values for a and b by inspecting the first and last terms
  • Test the proposal against the middle term and decide whether the expression is the square of a binomial
  • Factorise expressions whose leading coefficient is a perfect square, such as 36x² + 12x + 1
  • Recognise when the leading term's square root is irrational, and take out a common factor so that the identity can still be applied
  • Apply the same move when the common factor to be removed is a fraction rather than a whole number
  • Use the minus form of the identity on expressions whose middle term is negative, including ones written with the terms out of order
  • Produce an expression that fails the middle-term test, and state what that failure rules out
  • Distinguish the statement "(x + 2) is a factor" from the stronger statement that the expression equals (x + 2)²
  • State the class of expressions this method reaches, and name what is needed for the rest

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
factorisationrewriting an expression as a product of simpler expressionsprinted in this chapter (§4.3 heading, p. 72)
factoran expression that divides another exactly, leaving no remainderprinted in this chapter (§4.3, p. 72)
common factora factor shared by every term of a sum, so it can be taken outsideprinted in this chapter (§4.3, p. 73)
coefficientthe numerical multiplier attached to a power of the variableprinted in this chapter (§4.6, p. 81)
square rootthe number whose square is the given numberprinted in this chapter (§4.3, p. 72)
algebraic expressiona combination of numbers and letters built with the operationsprinted in this chapter (§4.1, p. 68)
identityan equality holding for every value of the letters in itprinted in this chapter (§4.2, p. 70)
perfect squarean expression that is exactly something squaredan added term; not printed anywhere in this book, which says "square" and leaves the adjective out
middle termthe 2ab term of the expansion, the one used as the test herean added phrasing; the chapter writes about the x term and about the middle square, never this compound
candidatea trial value for a or b, proposed before it has been checkedan added term, not printed in this chapter

Where people slip up

  • "Factorising is guessing until something works." Not here. The first and last terms leave no room for choice; only the middle term can decide, and it decides yes or no. Turn the whole procedure into a two-step check.
  • "36x² means a = 36x." It means a² = 36x², so a = 6x. Students carry the coefficient into a instead of taking its square root. Example 6 exists for exactly this.
  • "If √50 shows up, the expression cannot be factorised." It can — the radical is a signal to look for a common factor, not a dead end. The chapter prints √50 p and then routes around it.
  • "You can only take out a whole number as a common factor." The two starred exercises need 1/3 and 1/5. Removing a fraction is the same operation.
  • "Every three-term quadratic is a perfect square." Most are not. Run the middle-term test on x² + 5x + 4 and let it fail in front of the student.
  • "A negative middle term means the last term is negative too." In (a − b)² the last term is +b². 16y² − 24y + 9 has a positive 9.
  • "The terms must be written in the order a², 2ab, b²." 16s² + 25t² − 40st is the same expression with the middle term last. Reordering is the first move, not a different problem.
  • "(x + 2) is a factor" and "the expression is (x + 2)²" say the same thing. The second implies the first and not the other way round.
Transcript1,390 words

An identity has an equals sign in the middle of it, and an equals sign faces both ways. a plus b, all squared, equals a squared plus two a b plus b squared. Read left to right, that tells you how to expand a bracket. Read it right to left and it tells you something more useful. If you ever meet an expression of that shape, you are allowed to write it as a bracket squared.

That is factorising by recognition, and it is not a search. Nothing gets tried and nothing gets guessed. It is a matching problem. Here is one. x squared, plus four x, plus four. Cover the middle term with your thumb and look only at the two ends. The first end is x squared, so if this is something all squared, that something starts with x. The last end is four, and four is two squared.

So the candidate is x plus two. And notice what just happened. You had no freedom at all. The ends did not offer a choice between several answers. They named one candidate, and there was nothing to decide. Which leaves the middle term, and here is the idea that makes this quick. You do not work the middle term out. You check it. The candidate is x plus two. If it is right, the middle term has to be two, times x, times two. Four x.

Look up at the expression. It says four x. The candidate passes, and you are finished. So the ends are a naming step and the middle is a testing step. Mixing up those two jobs is what makes this feel like guesswork when it is not. Now one where the naming step has a trap in it. Thirty six x squared, plus twelve x, plus one. The temptation is to read the candidate off as thirty six x.

It is not. You want the thing that squares to give thirty six x squared, and that is six x, because six squared is thirty six. The other end is one, which is one squared, so the candidate is six x plus one. Test it. Two, times six x, times one, is twelve x. The expression says twelve x. It passes. So far every candidate has passed. Watch one fail.

x squared, plus five x, plus four. The ends are exactly the same as before, so they name exactly the same candidate. x plus two. Test it. Two, times x, times two, is four x. But the expression says five x. Four is not five, so this is not a perfect square, and no amount of staring will make it one. But look at what has actually been ruled out. Not that it factorises. Only that it factorises into two identical brackets.

In fact it is x plus one, times x plus four. It splits perfectly well. It just does not split into a matching pair. Now a harder failure, and a more interesting one. Fifty p squared, plus sixty p q, plus eighteen q squared. Start where you always start, at the ends. What squares to give fifty? Nothing you would want to write. Fifty sits between forty nine and sixty four, so its square root is not a whole number, and it is not a fraction either.

So the naming step fails before the test ever runs, and that is a different kind of no. Last time the ends named a candidate and the middle rejected it. This time the ends cannot name one at all. Fifty, sixty and eighteen are all even. So take a two out of all three. What is left inside is twenty five p squared, plus thirty p q, plus nine q squared.

Now the ends are twenty five and nine. Five and three. Candidate: five p plus three q. Test it. Two, times five p, times three q, is thirty p q. It passes. So the whole thing is two, times, five p plus three q, all squared. And here is why that worked, which is worth more than the answer. Fifty is two times twenty five, and the two is exactly the part of fifty that was stopping it being a square.

Take that part away and a square is what is left. Checked on every number below four hundred, that always holds, and the ones that needed nothing taken out are exactly the twenty squares. The factor you take out does not have to be a whole number, and this is where most people stop too early. Three a squared, plus four a b, plus four thirds b squared. Neither end is a square.

Take out a third. Inside is nine a squared, plus twelve a b, plus four b squared, and now the ends are nine and four. Three and two. Test: two, times three a, times two b, is twelve a b. It passes. A third, times, three a plus two b, all squared. The same move handles the one that looks worst. Nine fifths s squared, plus six s v, plus five v squared, is a fifth, times, three s plus five v, all squared.

Two small things that stop this method dead if nobody mentions them. The first is a minus. Sixteen y squared, minus twenty four y, plus nine. The ends are still positive, and they still name four and three. The minus lives in the middle term, and the middle term is the test. So test with a minus three. Two, times four y, times minus three, is minus twenty four y. It passes. Four y minus three, all squared.

The second is order. Sixteen s squared, plus twenty five t squared, minus forty s t. That is not written wrong, it is written in a different order, and the two ends of the expression are no longer the two ends of the identity. Put the two squares on the outside, and it is four s minus five t, all squared. It is worth knowing how special these expressions are, because the method recognises squares and nothing else.

Take every three term expression whose two end coefficients run from one to twelve, and whose middle runs from minus forty to forty. Eleven thousand six hundred and sixty four of them. Eight hundred and eight split into two brackets with ordinary numbers in. And of those, eighteen are a single bracket squared. Eighteen, out of eleven and a half thousand. So the squares sit inside the ones that factorise, which sit inside the ones that exist, and each step in is a big step.

Which tells you what to expect. This method will fail on most things, and that is not a failure of yours. One more distinction, because it is quietly everywhere. Saying x plus two is a factor of something is a weaker claim than saying the something is x plus two, all squared. x plus two is a factor of x squared plus four x plus four, and that one is the square.

But x plus two is also a factor of x squared plus five x plus six, and that one is not a square at all. Its other factor is x plus three. So a factor tells you one bracket. A perfect square tells you both, and tells you they are the same bracket. So the method, in one breath. The two ends name the candidate and leave you no choice. The middle term tests it, and you either pass or you do not.

If an end has no tidy square root, look for a common factor first, and remember the factor is allowed to be a fraction. And if the test fails you have learned something real. This is not a square. It may still factorise. Five thousand seven hundred and sixty expressions built to be a factor times a square were handed to the matcher cold. Eight hundred and sixty four went through as they stood, and the other four thousand eight hundred and ninety six all came good once the factor came out.

But nudge the middle term by one, and every single one of them dies. The test really is a test. For everything that is not a square, you need a method that does search. That is the next lesson.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab