PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 4, Another Peek Beyond the PointPrepShorts

Chapter 4 · Another Peek Beyond the Point

Long division continued past the ones place

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Dividing decimals11 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

11 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

Where does the point go in a division answer? Almost everybody is taught a rule, and almost everybody forgets it under pressure.

The idea

Long division was never about digits. It is repeated regrouping of place-value units — a Thousand broken into ten Hundreds, a Hundred into ten Tens — and nothing in the procedure says the breaking has to stop when it reaches the Ones. Allow one One to become ten Tenths and the whole-number algorithm starts producing decimal quotients with no new machinery whatsoever; the point in the answer is not a rule that has to be remembered but a record of the moment the regrouping crossed below the Ones. This is what rescues division when the trick of hunting for an equivalent fraction over 10, 100 or 1000 runs out — and it does run out, on something as small as ten divided by three.

What you should be able to do

  • Turn a fraction into a decimal by finding an equivalent fraction whose denominator is a power of ten, and say when that is possible
  • Explain why ten divided by three cannot be handled that way
  • Carry out whole-number long division as a sequence of regroupings, naming the place at every step
  • Continue the same procedure past the Ones, regrouping Ones into Tenths and Tenths into Hundredths
  • State where the decimal point goes in the quotient, and why it goes there
  • Verify a decimal quotient by the equivalent-fraction route
  • Divide a three-digit number by a one-digit divisor to three decimal places
  • Recognise the same quotient obtained by two independent methods as a check, not as duplicated work

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
long divisionthe book's own name for dividing by working down the place valuesprinted in bold in §4.3, Part II, p.78
place valuethe value a digit carries because of the column it stands inprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.76–78
regroupto trade one unit of a place for ten of the place below itprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.77–82
quotientthe answer to a divisionprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.76–82
dividendthe number being dividedprinted in §4.3, Part II, p.86
divisorthe number you divide byprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.74–75
remainderwhat is left over when a place will not split evenlyprinted in §4.3, Part II, p.85
equivalent fractiona different-looking fraction naming the same quantityprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.76, 80
decimal quotienta quotient that continues past the Ones — the phrase heading this stretch of the chapterprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.76, 78
Onesthe place immediately left of the pointprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.77–82
Tenthsthe first place right of the pointprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.79–82
Hundredthsthe second place right of the pointprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.80–82
Thousandthsthe third place right of the pointprinted in §4.3, Part II, pp.82–83
counting numberthe book's name for the whole numbers being divided hereprinted in §4.3, Part II, p.76
crossing the pointthe explanation's name for the single regrouping that takes the working from Ones into Tenthsan added phrasing; the book describes this step without giving it a name

Where people slip up

  • "Division stops when you run out of digits." It stops when the remainder reaches zero, and those are different events. 1324 and 1325 differ by one and the second needs two more places.
  • "You put a decimal point in the answer and then bring down a zero." That is the mechanical version of the rule, and it is what students forget under pressure. The chapter's version is that a leftover One is traded for ten Tenths, exactly as a leftover Hundred is traded for ten Tens. The zero appears because ten Tenths is written 10 in the Tenths column, not because a rule said to write one.
  • "The remainder 1 means the answer is 331 remainder 1." True if you stop there. The chapter's move is to refuse to stop, and to say what the leftover One is worth once it is broken up.
  • "Every fraction can be turned into a decimal by finding the right equivalent fraction." Ten over three cannot, and the chapter says so on Part II p.76. That is the reason the place-value method is introduced at all.
  • "The two methods are alternatives, so learn the easier one." They are alternatives only where both work. The equivalent-fraction route is quick and limited; long division is slower and always available. The chapter runs both on 1325 over 4 precisely so the reader can see them agree.
  • "The decimal point goes wherever it looks right." In the layout the book uses, it goes at exactly one place — between the last Ones digit and the first Tenths digit — and the reader can always find it by asking which step regrouped Ones. Q2(b) on Part II p.83 is built from exactly this error: every option there carries the same digits and only the point moves. Q2(a) mixes in two distractors that change the digit string as well, so an explanation that tells the student only the point ever moves will mis-teach that item.
Transcript1,447 words

Twenty-nine metres of ribbon, shared equally between two friends. Fourteen metres each. And one metre left over. That leftover metre is the whole of this video. You cannot hand it to either of them and you are not allowed to throw it away, so it has to be cut. Half a metre each. And a half is five tenths, so half a metre is nought point five of a metre.

Twenty-nine divided by two is fourteen point five. Nothing there was hard. But the answer needed a place the question did not have. Now share the same twenty-nine metres between four friends. Seven metres each, and again one metre left over. This time it has to split four ways. There is a quick way to finish this, worth seeing before we do anything else. Twenty-nine over four. If the bottom were ten, or a hundred, we could read the answer straight off, because those are the numbers our decimal places are built from.

So hunt for one. Four times twenty-five is a hundred. Multiply the top by twenty-five as well, and twenty-nine over four becomes seven hundred and twenty-five over a hundred. Seven point two five. Seven metres and twenty-five centimetres each — the leftover metre became nought point two five apiece. That was quick. So let us find out how far it goes. Ten divided by three. Hunt for the same thing. Can we write ten over three with a bottom of ten, or a hundred, or a thousand?

Try ten. Three would have to divide ten, and it does not. A hundred. No. A thousand. Still no. And this is not bad luck that runs out after a while. Three shares no factor at all with ten, so no power of ten will ever be divisible by it, however far you go. The hunt does not just fail here. It fails permanently. And that is uncomfortable, because of all the bottom numbers from two to a hundred, only fourteen can be handled this way. Eighty-five cannot.

It is not a method. It is a lucky break that we happened to get twice. So we need something that always works. We already have it, and it has been quietly doing something more interesting than anyone said. Long division. Take one thousand three hundred and twenty-four, shared between four, and watch it as sharing rather than as digits. One thousand between four. Nobody gets a whole thousand, so break it up. One thousand is ten hundreds.

Ten hundreds, plus the three hundreds already there, is thirteen hundreds. Thirteen hundreds between four is three hundreds each, with one hundred left over. Break that too. One hundred is ten tens, plus the two already there, is twelve tens. That is three tens each, nothing left. And four ones between four is one each. Three hundreds, three tens, one one. Three hundred and thirty-one. Every single step was the same move: something too big to share gets broken into ten of the next thing down.

Now change one digit. One thousand three hundred and twenty-five. The first three steps are identical. Three hundreds each, three tens each. And then, five ones between four. One each. And one one left over. This is where school usually stops. Three hundred and thirty-one, remainder one. And that is true. Three hundred and thirty-one fours, plus one, is one thousand three hundred and twenty-five. But something easy to miss has gone wrong. We stopped because we ran out of digits, not because we ran out of remainder — and those are completely different reasons to stop.

Out of every four-digit number you could put there, three quarters of them do this. So look at what we have actually been doing every time we got stuck. A thousand would not share, so it became ten hundreds. A hundred would not share, so it became ten tens. There is one one that will not share. Nobody ever said the breaking had to stop. One one is ten tenths. Not roughly, not as a trick — a one is ten tenths, in exactly the same way that a hundred is ten tens.

So break it. Ten tenths, between four. Two tenths each, and two tenths left over. And notice we invented nothing. No new rule, no instruction to bring down a zero. The ten appears because ten tenths is written as a ten. Two tenths left, and four friends. So do it again, one place lower. Two tenths is twenty hundredths. Twenty hundredths between four is five hundredths each. And nothing is left over. Now we can stop — and this time we are stopping for the right reason.

So each share is three hundreds, three tens, one one, two tenths and five hundredths. Three hundred and thirty-one point two five. Check it. Three hundred and thirty-one point two five, times four, is one thousand three hundred and twenty-five exactly. Now the question everybody actually worries about. Where does the point go? And the answer is that you never have to decide. It is already there. It went in the moment we broke a one into tenths, because that is where the sharing crossed below the ones.

Everything before that crossing is the whole-number part. Everything after it is not. So the point is not a rule to remember and not something you place at the end by eye. If you forget where it goes, ask which step broke up a one. That was checked on nearly two thousand different numbers, against four different divisors, and it never once landed anywhere else. And now the quick method is worth coming back to, because for this division it does work.

Four times twenty-five is a hundred, so multiply top and bottom by twenty-five. Thirty-three thousand one hundred and twenty-five, over a hundred. Three hundred and thirty-one point two five. The same answer. And that is not wasted effort — it is the strongest thing we have done so far. Two methods that share none of their machinery landed on the same number. The quick one is fast and only sometimes available. The long one is slower and always available.

Where both work, running both is how you find out you were right. One more, and this one goes further down. Two hundred and thirty-seven, shared between eight. Two hundreds between eight gives nobody a hundred, so they become twenty tens, plus the three already there: twenty-three tens. That is two tens each, seven tens left. Those become seventy ones, plus seven, seventy-seven ones. Seventy-seven between eight is nine each, five ones left.

And now the crossing. Five ones become fifty tenths. Fifty between eight is six tenths each, two tenths left. Two tenths become twenty hundredths. Two hundredths each, four hundredths left. Four hundredths become forty thousandths. Five thousandths each, and nothing left. Twenty-nine point six two five. Five columns wide, and every one opened because the column before it had something that would not share. Try four of them, both ways.

Eighteen over five. Five times two is ten, so double the top as well: thirty-six over ten. Three point six. Four hundred and fifteen over four. Multiply by twenty-five: one hundred and three point seven five. One thousand two hundred and seventeen over two. Multiply by five: six hundred and eight point five. And four thousand eight hundred and twenty-seven over eight, times a hundred and twenty-five: six hundred and three point three seven five.

Every one of those bottom numbers divided a power of ten, which is the only reason the quick route was on offer at all. Long division gives exactly the same four answers. Which is what you want. If two methods that work differently ever disagreed, one of them would be wrong. Last thing, and it is what exam questions are built out of. One thousand five hundred and twenty-six, divided by four, is three hundred and eighty-one point five.

But suppose you are handed four answers to choose between, and they all look like the same digits with the point moved. Look again. Two of them carry an extra zero, so their digits are genuinely different, and checking the point alone would not save you. Do the same with three thousand five hundred and sixty-seven over eight and this time it really is only the point that moves. Four hundred and forty-five point eight seven five.

Which is the honest version of all of this. The digits come out of the sharing. The point comes out of the step where the sharing crossed below the ones. Neither is decoration and neither is guesswork. Both are records of something you already did.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab