PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 9 Mathematics · Chapter 1, Orienting Yourself: The Use of CoordinatesPrepShorts

Chapter 1 · Orienting Yourself: The Use of Coordinates

Where coordinates came from: grid cities, meridians, and the road to the Cartesian plane

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Why coordinates10 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

10 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

Point across the room and say “it’s over there”. Say it down a telephone instead and you have just discovered why coordinates had to be invented.

The idea

A coordinate system is not a drawing; it is an agreement, and the agreement has four separable parts — two fixed directions at right angles, one agreed starting point, one agreed unit of length, and numbers that are allowed to run backwards past the starting point. §1.1 tells a history in which those four parts arrive separately and centuries apart, and the chapter's own closing questions let you test each one by removing it: take away the negatives (p. 12, item 5) and three-quarters of the plane loses its addresses; keep them and a city on a grid (p. 13, item 14) becomes addressable with two numbers. So the argument is not "many people contributed". It is that each ingredient does one identifiable job, and you can prove which job by seeing what breaks without it.

What you should be able to do

  • State what a coordinate system must supply before any position can be named: two perpendicular reference directions, an origin, a unit, and signed numbers
  • Explain how streets laid out on a grid at a uniform spacing already function as a coordinate system, and how a person navigates by counting units in two directions from a centre
  • Explain why a shared zero meridian is needed before longitudes can be compared between places, and identify Ujjayinī's role in the ancient description
  • Say which mathematical ingredient Brahmagupta's work on zero and negative quantities supplies to the four-quadrant plane
  • State, in their own words, the identification Descartes and Fermat made between a point of the plane and a pair of numbers
  • Answer the chapter's own thought experiment: describe what a coordinate system without negative numbers can and cannot locate
  • Apply a two-number street label to a grid city and say why exactly one intersection answers to each label

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
system of coordinatesan agreed framework of reference lines and units that lets numbers name exact positionsprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1
grid-based thinkinglaying out reference lines at uniform spacing so that position can be counted rather than describedprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1
Sindhu-Sarasvatī Civilisationthe ancient urban civilisation whose streets were set out on a precise North–South and East–West gridprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1
meridiana reference line of longitude from which other longitudes are measuredprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1
latitude, longitudethe pair of angular coordinates that fixes a place on the Earth's surfaceprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1
Celestial Coordinatescoordinates used to fix the position of an object in the sky rather than on the groundprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1
eclipticthe sun's apparent path, used in the chapter as the reference from which sky coordinates were measuredprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1
astrolabea hand-held instrument for finding one's position from the starsprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 2
Siddhāntasthe Indian astronomical treatises named as the source studied and translatedprinted in this chapter, §1.1, pp. 1–2
Sindhindthe name under which Brahmagupta's work travelled into Arabicprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 2
negative axesthe parts of the axes carrying values below zeroprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1
coordinate geometrythe study of geometry through coordinates and equationsprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1 and §1.2, p. 2
Baudhāyana–Pythagoras Theoremthe relation between the two legs and the longest side of a right triangleprinted in this chapter, §1.1, p. 1; used at §1.4, p. 9
four ingredients of a frametwo perpendicular directions, an origin, a unit, and signed numbersscaffolding added here; the chapter supplies all four but does not group or count them

Where people slip up

  • "Descartes invented coordinates." The chapter's own account distributes the invention: the grid and the two perpendicular directions are millennia older, the reference meridian and the tables of latitude and longitude are ancient, and the signed numbers arrive with Brahmagupta. What 1637 adds is the identification of a point with a pair of numbers, which is a different claim from "used a grid".
  • "The history is decoration in front of the real chapter." The chapter puts a mathematical question about it in the end-of-chapter set: remove the negatives and say what survives. That is not a history question.
  • "Grid streets are just tidy planning." A uniform spacing is what makes counting possible; without a fixed spacing you can still draw straight streets but you cannot convert a count into a distance.
  • "Any two lines will do as axes." They must be perpendicular for the two measurements to be independent and for the Baudhāyana–Pythagoras relation to apply later — which is exactly how §1.4 gets its distances.
  • "Zero and the negatives are just extra numbers." They are what allow one point to be the origin of everything and what allow a direction to be reversed. The chapter says plainly that the four-quadrant plane depends on them.
  • "An origin is a natural feature of the world." Ujjayinī is a choice. Another civilisation chose elsewhere; the mathematics is unaffected, the numbers are not.
Transcript1,337 words

Point at something across the room and say: it is over there. That works, and it works only because the other person can see your hand. Now describe the same place to someone on a telephone, a thousand kilometres away. Suddenly you need words like from, and along, and how far. You need to count from something, in some direction, in some agreed size of step. That is the whole of what a coordinate system is. Not a drawing. An agreement.

And the agreement has exactly four parts, which arrived separately, and centuries apart. Start with a city, laid out four and a half thousand years ago. The streets run north to south and east to west, crossing at right angles, set about ten metres apart. It is tempting to call that tidy planning and move on. But look at what the even spacing buys you. Streets can be perfectly straight without being evenly spaced, and then you can still walk them, but you cannot count them.

Put two streets a hundred metres apart, then the next pair ten metres apart, and being told the third street from the centre tells you nothing whatever about how far you have walked. A fixed spacing is what turns a count into a distance. So a merchant gives directions like this. From the centre, six streets across, then four streets up. On a ten metre grid, that is sixty metres and forty metres.

Two numbers have just replaced a paragraph of description. And notice what is carrying the weight. Six and four are not distances. They are counts. Change the spacing to five metres, or twenty, or fifty, and the same pair of numbers names a different place every time. The unit is doing silent work, and it is the first of the four parts. Now the second part, and it is the one that looks like decoration.

The two directions meet at a right angle. Why should that matter? Take three across and four up. With the directions perpendicular, the straight line distance from the centre is exactly five. Now tilt the two directions to sixty degrees apart and keep the same counts. That distance is no longer five. It is the square root of thirty seven. Open them to a hundred and twenty degrees and it collapses to the square root of thirteen.

Same counts, three different places. The right angle is what stops the two measurements from contaminating each other. The third part is a starting point, and here the story leaves the city and goes around the world. To say how far east a place is, you must first say east of what. Two observers measuring from two different lines will produce two different numbers for the same town, and neither of them is wrong.

Ancient astronomical treatises settled it by agreement. Measure from the meridian running through Ujjayini. Later tables of latitude and longitude list thousands of places, Ujjayini among them, written there as Ozine. An origin is not a feature of the world. It is a choice, and once it is made, it is what everything else counts from. The same move works upward. The sun traces an apparent path across the sky through the year, and that path can serve as a reference line exactly as a meridian does on the ground.

Aryabhata replaced the older chords with sines, and positions in the sky were measured out from that path. And the choice of reference line is just as arbitrary up there as it is on the ground. What matters is not which line, only that everybody measures from the same one. A frame is a frame, whether the thing you are locating is a shop or a star. Three parts in place, and the picture is still broken.

Everything so far counts forwards. Six across. Four up. East of the meridian. There is no way at all to say: four streets the other way. Brahmagupta supplied what was missing. Zero treated as a number in its own right, and quantities allowed to go below it. Only then can a line run through the starting point and out the far side. Without that, the plane has one corner. With it, four.

And then the idea travels, which is a mathematical event and not merely a historical one. The Indian treatises are translated into Arabic, where Brahmagupta's work becomes known as the Sindhind. The reference meridian survives the journey and is written there as Arin. Al Biruni travels to India, uses Indian trigonometric methods to fix the coordinates of Asian cities, and perfects the astrolabe, an instrument for finding your own position from the stars.

Omar Khayyam is the first to attack an algebraic problem by reading it as a picture in the plane, and in the twelfth century the whole apparatus reaches Europe. Then, one year apart, Fermat and Descartes. What they add is a single sentence, and it is smaller and stranger than it sounds. A point is not merely labelled by a pair of numbers. A point is a pair of numbers.

Once that is true, a shape and an equation are one object seen twice, and anything you prove about either you have proved about both. A circle stops being a picture you have to look at, and becomes a question you can answer with arithmetic. Does this pair of numbers satisfy the equation, yes or no. That identification is what two thousand years of parts had been assembling towards. Now test the parts, by taking them away one at a time.

Remove the negative numbers first. What can the frame still reach? Only places up and to the right of the starting point. Everything behind it, everything below it, and the whole quarter diagonally opposite lose their addresses. In the limit, three quarters of the plane goes dark. But be careful with that number, because it is only true in the limit. In any patch you actually draw you keep slightly more than a quarter. In a twenty one by twenty one grid of points, a hundred and twenty one of the four hundred and forty one survive, because the two axes themselves survive.

There is an obvious repair, and it almost works. Instead of signed numbers, write the direction down. Three east, four north. Two directions with two choices each gives four combinations, which is exactly the four quarters you had lost. But it has a seam. A point sitting on the north south line is zero east, and it is equally zero west. One place, two correct names. A signed number has no such seam, because zero is neither positive nor negative, and there is only one of it.

Now put all four parts back, and test them together. A city again. Two main roads crossing at the centre, every other street parallel to one of them, two hundred metres apart, ten in each direction. Label a crossing by its two street numbers. How many crossings answer to four three? Exactly one. How many to three four? Also exactly one, and it is a different crossing, two hundred metres away in each direction.

Of the hundred labels this grid carries, ninety name a different place when you reverse them. The ten that do not are the ten where both numbers were already the same. So here is the agreement, in full. Two directions at a right angle, so that the two measurements do not contaminate each other. One agreed starting point, because counting needs something to count from. One agreed unit, because a count is not a distance until you fix the size of a step.

And numbers allowed to run backwards past zero, because without them three quarters of everywhere has no name. Four parts, four jobs, and every job provable by removing the part and watching precisely what breaks. None of it is a drawing. All of it is an agreement, and that is exactly why it works no matter who is holding the pencil.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab