PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 8 Mathematics · Chapter 5, Number PlayPrepShorts

Chapter 5 · Number Play

The alternating-sum test for 11

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Divisibility shortcuts, and why they work9 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

9 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

The test for eleven looks nothing like the test for nine, and is built by the same method with exactly one line changed.

The idea

The test for eleven looks nothing like the test for nine, and it is built by the same method. Only one thing changes: the place values no longer all sit one past a multiple of the divisor — they sit one past, then one short, then one past again, forever. So each digit still contributes just itself, but now it contributes with a sign, and what survives is the alternating total. That total is not the remainder. It is the number's signed offset from the nearest multiple of eleven, which is why it can come out negative without anything having gone wrong, and why turning it into a remainder needs one more step.

What you should be able to do

  • Express each place value as a multiple of eleven with an offset of one, and identify the sign of that offset
  • Explain why the sign alternates from one place value to the next, and why the alternation continues indefinitely
  • Sort a number's digits into the places whose offset is positive and the places whose offset is negative
  • Compute the excess total, the shortfall total, and the difference between them
  • Interpret a difference of zero, of eleven, of a multiple of eleven, and of a negative value
  • Convert a negative alternating total into the actual remainder on division by eleven
  • Carry out the same test in its compact form, signing the digits from the units end, and explain why the two procedures are the same procedure
  • Use the test to find missing digits in a number known to be a multiple of eleven or of a composite containing eleven

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
alternatingchanging from one thing to the other and back, place value by place valueprinted in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.127)
excesshow far a place value runs past a multiple of elevenprinted in this chapter, in the worked table (Part I, §5.2, p.128)
shorthow far a place value falls below a multiple of elevenprinted in this chapter, in the worked table (Part I, §5.2, p.128)
place valuewhat a digit is worth because of where it standsprinted in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.123)
remainderwhat is left when a division does not come out exactlyprinted in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.116)
divisibleleaving nothing over on divisionprinted throughout this chapter
multiplea number obtained by multiplying a given number by a whole numberprinted in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.116)
units digitthe digit in the ones place, where the signing startsprinted in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.123)
shortcutthe chapter's word for a divisibility test done without dividingprinted in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.123)
signed offsetthe explanation's name for the alternating total, read as a distance with a directionan added term; the chapter describes the quantity in words and does not name it

Where people slip up

  • "A negative answer means I made a mistake." It means the number falls short of the next multiple of eleven rather than running past the previous one. The chapter's own worked example lands on a negative value, and its careful sentence reports the position two ways: so far short, or so far past.
  • "The alternating total is the remainder." The compact procedure on Part I p.129 says the result gives the remainder, and taken literally that cannot be right — a remainder is never negative. Add eleven to a negative total to get the remainder. The prose on Part I p.128 phrases it correctly.
  • "Start the signs at the left-hand digit." The signing is anchored at the units digit because that is the place value that runs one past. Anchoring at the left flips every sign whenever the digit count is even, and the test then reports the wrong direction. Show the failure once.
  • "A difference of zero and a difference of eleven mean different things." Both mean the number is a multiple of eleven. Any multiple of eleven in the difference does. This is the question Part I p.128 asks and leaves open.
  • "Eleven cannot have a digit test, because it has two digits." The method never cared how many digits the divisor has. It cares only how each place value sits relative to a multiple of it.
  • "The two printed procedures are two different tests." They are the same test, one written as two columns and one written as signed digits. The chapter asks the student to notice this.
  • "Zeros can be skipped." A zero digit contributes nothing to its total but it still occupies a place, so it still shifts the signs of everything to its left. Two of the six exercise numbers are built around this.
Transcript1,254 words

You have a test for nine. Add up the digits. Now try it on eleven. Take five hundred and seventy-two, which is a multiple of eleven. Its digits add to fourteen, and fourteen is not a multiple of eleven. So adding the digits does not work at all. But do not throw the method away, because the method itself still works. Only one thing has to change. For nine, every place value sat one PAST a multiple of nine. That is why every digit contributed itself and you could just add.

For eleven, the places do not all lean the same way. One sits past. The next sits short. The next sits past again. Every digit still contributes itself. It just contributes with a sign now. So let us go and look at the places. Start with the units place, which is worth one. One is nought elevens, plus one. It runs one past a multiple of eleven. Call that plus one.

Now the tens place, worth ten. Ten is not one past anything useful. It is one SHORT of eleven. Write it that way: ten is one eleven, minus one. Call that minus one. And that is already the whole difference from the nines argument. Two places in, the lean has changed direction. The hundreds place. A hundred. Nine elevens is ninety-nine. And a hundred is ninety-nine plus one. So a hundred runs one past. Plus one again.

Notice what has happened. Past, short, past. The sign has flipped twice. And notice what has not happened. The offset is still one. Not two, not five. Always one. That is what keeps a digit contributing only itself, and it is the same thing that made the nines test possible. A thousand. Ninety-one elevens is one thousand and one, so a thousand is one short. Past, short, past, short. Twenty-four places checked, then twenty-four more, and it never breaks.

Here is why it cannot break. Take a place that runs one past and multiply by ten. One past, ten times over, is ten past. But ten is one short of eleven, so ten past a multiple is one short of the next one. The lean flips. Every single time. That is the alternation, and it is a consequence, not a coincidence. Compare nine, where every place runs one past and nothing ever flips. That is exactly why the nines test needs no signs and this one does.

Now read a number straight off its digits. Four hundred and sixty-two. Four hundreds. Each hundred runs one past, so four hundreds run four past. Four ninety-nines is three hundred and ninety-six, and four hundred is that plus four. Six tens. Each ten falls one short, so six tens fall six short. Six elevens is sixty-six, and sixty is that minus six. Two units. Each unit runs one past, so two units run two past.

Now collect. Four past, six short, two past. Four minus six plus two is nought. So four hundred and sixty-two sits exactly on a multiple of eleven. And nothing there was a division. That gives you a procedure, and it is worth writing down as two columns. One column for the digits whose places run past. The units, the hundreds, the ten-thousands, and so on up. One column for the digits whose places fall short. The tens, the thousands, and so on.

Total each column. Then subtract the shortfall total from the excess total. Three steps, and not one of them is a division. Try it on a six-digit number. Three, two, nought, one, eight, five. The places that run past hold two, one and five. Those add to eight. The places that fall short hold three, nought and eight. Those add to eleven. Step three. Eight minus eleven. Eight minus eleven is minus three.

And a lot of people stop right there and assume they have made a mistake. They have not. Minus three is a perfectly good answer, and it is telling you something precise. It says the number falls three SHORT of a multiple of eleven. That is not the same as a remainder. A remainder counts how far you are PAST the multiple below you. What the difference reports is a signed offset. Which multiple you are nearest, and which side of it you are on.

Being allowed to come out negative is not a flaw in the test. It is the test carrying information a remainder cannot carry. So the number is three short. Fine. We will convert that in a moment. First, the same test written far shorter. Put a plus in front of the units digit, then a minus, then a plus, alternating all the way to the left. Then just evaluate it. No columns, no totals, one line.

On the same six-digit number that gives minus three again. And that is not luck. It is the same procedure. Sorting the digits into two columns and then subtracting IS putting alternating signs on them. Swept over three thousand numbers, and three thousand more up around half a million, the two forms agree every single time. So there are not two tests here. There is one test written two ways.

Now convert. Our number is three short of a multiple of eleven. If you are three short of the multiple above, how far past the multiple below are you? Eleven minus three. Eight. So the remainder is eight. Add eleven to a negative total and you have it. Is that step worth a scene of its own? Yes, because of how often it bites. Of three thousand small numbers, the alternating total is not the remainder for nine hundred and twenty-eight of them. Of three thousand six-digit numbers, it fails for one thousand seven hundred and thirty-eight.

Roughly a third, then well over half. The longer the number, the more likely you need that last step. One more case, and it catches people out. What if the difference itself comes out as eleven? Take ninety thousand nine hundred and four. Its alternating total is twenty-two. Twenty-two is not nought. But twenty-two is a multiple of eleven, and that is enough. The number is a multiple of eleven.

Take eight hundred and fifty-seven thousand and seventy-six. Its total is minus eleven. Also a multiple. Also a yes. Nought, eleven, minus eleven. Across three thousand numbers those are the only multiples of eleven any total ever reaches, and every number reaching one of them is a multiple. So the rule is not that the total must be nought. It is that the total must be a multiple of eleven.

Two ways to get this wrong, both tempting. First, throwing away zeros. A zero adds nothing to its column, so why keep it? Because it still holds a place, and every digit to its left is sitting one place further along than you think. Drop the zeros from ninety thousand nine hundred and four and you get nine hundred and ninety-four, whose total is four, not twenty-two. A multiple has become a non-multiple.

Second, starting the signs at the left-hand digit instead of the units. That agrees perfectly on all nine hundred three-digit numbers, which is exactly why it survives. On four-digit numbers it flips every sign. It still spots multiples of eleven correctly every time, and it reports the offset the wrong way round almost always. The signs are anchored at the units because the units place is the one that runs one past. Everything else follows from there.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab