PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 8 Mathematics · Chapter 5, Number Play
Chapter 5 · Number Play
Deciding parity without computing the answer
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google10 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
Whether a total is even or odd is fixed before you compute it. Write 3, 4, 5, 6 and count the gaps rather than the numbers.
The idea
Whether a total is even or odd is fixed before you compute it, because parity survives arithmetic in a predictable way. Change one plus to a minus and the total shifts by twice the term you touched — an even shift — so all eight ways of signing four numbers must land on the same side of even. And since adding, subtracting and multiplying each act on parity by a fixed rule, you can read the answer off the shape of the expression. Saying an expression is always even is the claim that every substitution leaves 2 as a factor of the value. Often you can show that by lifting a 2 out of the expression itself, and where you can, that is the stronger of the two arguments — but the two are not the same claim.
What you should be able to do
- List all eight ways of placing plus and minus signs between four numbers, using a branching diagram rather than trial and error
- Show that switching one sign changes the value by twice one of the terms, and conclude that all eight values share one parity
- State the three parity rules for a sum or difference and apply them along a chain of terms
- Decide whether an arithmetic expression is even without evaluating it
- Decide whether an algebraic expression is even for every integer value of its letters, and give an example and a non-example where it is not
- Justify "always even" two ways — by parity of the parts, and by exhibiting 2 as a factor — and say what each justification does that the other does not
- Recognise that a claim quantified over all integers cannot be settled by substituting numbers, but can be destroyed by one substitution
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| parity | whether a number is even or odd, treated as a property in its own right | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.113) |
| even parity | the property of being even, said of a whole family of values at once | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.113) |
| even number | a number with 2 as a factor; the chapter states explicitly that negatives count | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.113) |
| odd number | a number without 2 as a factor | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.113) |
| letter-number | a letter standing for a number, so a claim can cover every value at once | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.123) |
| expression | a combination of numbers, letters and operations, not an equation | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.114) |
| integer | a whole number, positive, negative or zero | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.115) |
| factor | a number that divides another exactly; here, the 2 lifted out of an expression | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.113) |
| non-example | a substitution that makes a claimed property fail | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.116) |
| token model | the positive-and-negative counter picture of integers the chapter points back to | printed in this chapter at Part I, §5.1, p.115; the compound is broken across a line with figure lettering interleaved between its two halves, so it does not extract — read it on p.115 |
| sign switch | the explanation's shorthand for replacing one plus by a minus, or the reverse | an added shorthand, not printed |
Where people slip up
- "Negative numbers are neither even nor odd." The chapter takes the trouble to say otherwise on Part I p.113, and it must, because half the printed results in the sign-switching activity are negative. An even number is one with 2 as a factor; the sign is irrelevant.
- "Checking a few cases shows it always happens." Part I p.115 says outright that the supply of four-number choices is unlimited. Eight expressions for one run is a demonstration; the sign-switch argument is a proof. Keep the two visibly apart.
- "Switching a sign changes parity, because minus is different from plus." It changes the total by twice a term. Twice anything is even, and shifting by an even amount cannot cross between even and odd. This is the load-bearing step of the whole topic.
- "3g + 5h is even because 3 + 5 is even." Coefficients do not add like that. The parity of each term depends on its letter, and odd × odd stays odd.
- "x² + 2 is even because 2 is even." The square carries the parity of x, so the expression is even only for even x. The chapter's 38-and-11 pair is there precisely to break this.
- "13k − 5k is odd because 13 and 5 are odd." Simplify first: it is 8k. Students who read parity off unsimplified coefficients get this backwards.
- "Showing 2 is a factor and showing both parts are even are the same argument." They are not, and the chapter gives both for a reason. The factor argument survives when the parts are not separately even — 6m + 2n is 2(3m + n) whether or not 3m is even — while the parts argument does not.
- "One value makes it true, so it is always true." One value can only refute. The example / non-example pairing on Part I p.116 is a lesson in what each kind of instance is worth.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises
Transcript1,372 words
Write four numbers in a row. Three, four, five, six. Between them there are three gaps, and into each gap you can put a plus or a minus. Two choices, three times over. Two times two times two. Eight expressions, all built from the same four numbers. Work all eight of them out, and something happens that has no business being obvious in advance. Every single one of the eight lands on an even number.
Not usually. Every time. And that is worth explaining rather than admiring. Here is how to be sure that none of the eight has been missed. Start at three. The first gap splits into two branches: plus four, and minus four. Each of those splits again at five, and each of those splits again at six. One level per gap, doubling each time. Two, then four, then eight leaves. Every path down the tree spells out one expression, and every expression is one path.
So there are exactly eight of them, and the tree is the reason we know that. No hunting, and no wondering whether a ninth is hiding somewhere. Take a couple of them and work them out. Three plus four minus five plus six is eight. Three minus four minus five minus six is minus twelve. Both even, and one of them negative, which is worth pausing on, because it is where half of this topic gets thrown away.
Minus twelve is even. So are minus two, minus four and minus six. An even number is one with two as a factor, and the sign has nothing to do with it. Start from five, six, seven, eight instead and you get twelve, and minus sixteen. Even again. Now the real question. Why can none of the eight come out odd? Take the all-plus one. Three plus four plus five plus six is eighteen.
Change a single sign. The plus in front of the four becomes a minus. The new total is ten. Eighteen to ten. It has moved by eight. And eight is twice four, which is exactly the term whose sign we touched. That is not a coincidence about this run of numbers. It happens every time. Here is why. The four was being added on; now it is being taken away.
So the total has lost that four twice over. Once for the adding that stopped, once for the taking away that started. Switch a minus back to a plus and the same thing runs the other way. The total gains twice that term. Either direction, the move is twice something. And twice anything is even. Adding or taking away an even amount cannot carry a number across from even to odd.
So a sign switch changes the total and never changes its parity. That is the step the whole topic rests on. Checked on a hundred and sixty-four sets of four numbers, then again on two hundred and sixty-four more, at every gap of every signing: the move is twice that term, and it is even. One switch keeps the parity. But there are eight expressions here, not two. So walk between them. From the all-plus one, switch the first gap.
Switch the second. Switch the third. Switch one of them back. Every one of the eight can be reached from every other, one switch at a time. Three switches is the furthest apart any two of them get, which is one per gap. And every step along the way keeps the parity. So all eight share the parity of the one we started from. The plain total is eighteen, and eighteen is even, so all eight are even.
And the plain total is the one value you can work out without choosing any signs at all. There is a second way to see this, and it never mentions switching. Odd with odd gives even. Even with even gives even. Odd with even gives odd. And each of those three covers a difference as well as a sum. Seven plus five is twelve. Seven minus five is two. Both even.
Because taking a number away and adding it on shift the total by the same amount. So chain the rules along the expression one term at a time, and the signs simply never come into it. Each step only ever asks whether the next term is odd or even. Three, four, five, six. Odd with even is odd; that with odd is even; that with even is even. And a third way, with no symbols in it at all.
Picture each number as a pile of counters. A plus makes it a positive pile, a minus a negative one. A positive counter and a negative counter cancel, and both of them go. They always leave in pairs. Two at a time, never one. So whatever the signs are, the number of counters that disappears is even. What is left over is the answer, and its parity was settled before any cancelling started.
Three ways of saying the same thing, and not one of them ever needed to know what the four numbers actually were. Which raises the obvious question. Did any of that mention four? It did not. Two numbers have one gap and two expressions. Five numbers have four gaps and sixteen. Seven numbers have six gaps and sixty-four expressions. And in every case a sign switch moves the total by twice a term, so every expression from one block shares one parity.
Checked across a hundred and eight blocks, of every length from two up to seven. And the side they land on is the parity of the plain total, which you can know without writing down a single expression. So parity comes off the shape of an expression rather than its value, which means you can answer a question without doing the arithmetic in it. Here are eight, and none of them is to be worked out.
Forty-three plus thirty-seven. Odd with odd. Even. Six hundred and seventy-two minus three hundred and forty-eight. Even with even. Even. Seven hundred and eight minus four hundred and seventy-seven. Even with odd. Odd. Products behave differently. A product is odd only when every single factor is odd. So four times three hundred and forty-seven times three is even because of that four alone, and a hundred and nineteen times three hundred and three is odd.
Four of the eight come out even and four odd, and not one of them was multiplied out. Now the same question with letters in it, where even has to mean even for every integer at once. Two a plus two b. Both parts are even whatever a and b are. Always even. Three g plus five h. Two odd coefficients, but that is not how coefficients work. Three g carries the parity of g, five h carries the parity of h, and odd with even is odd. So it depends.
Thirteen k minus five k looks odd for the same reason and is not. It simplifies to eight k. Six m minus three n has a six on the front and is still not always even, because the three hands the parity straight to n. Of the nine, five are even for every integer and four are not. And the four that fail are not never even. Take x squared plus two.
Put in six and you get thirty-eight. Even. Does that settle it? Put in three and you get eleven. Odd. One value can destroy a claim about every integer. No value can establish one, and no number of values can either, because there is always another integer you have not tried. When a claim is true there are two ways to show it. Four m plus two q: both of its parts are even.
Or: it is two times, two m plus q. A two lifted clean out of the whole thing. Put in m of four and q of minus nine and it comes to minus two. Those are not the same argument. Six m plus two n is two times three m plus n whether or not three m is even, so the factor survives exactly where the parts do not.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- When a sum of consecutive numbers is a multiple of somethingClass 8 · Ch 5, Number Play
Comes up again in
- The four divisibility facts you can prove, and how to use themClass 8 · Ch 5, Number Play
- Always, sometimes, or never: one counterexample settles itClass 8 · Ch 5, Number Play