PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 8 Mathematics · Chapter 1, Fractions in DisguisePrepShorts

Chapter 1 · Fractions in Disguise

What a percentage greater than 100 does and does not mean

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Finding a percentage of a quantity10 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

10 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

“A percentage cannot be more than a hundred” is a belief almost everybody holds, and it is wrong about half the time.

The idea

Nothing in the definition of a percentage puts a ceiling at 100. All 100% means is "the thing you chose to measure against", and there is no rule that a quantity must be smaller than its own reference. So a percentage runs past 100 exactly when the base is a target, a previous value or any other yardstick — and it cannot possibly pass 100 when the base is a whole of which the quantity is literally a part. Whether 250% is sensible or nonsense is not a fact about the number 250; it is a fact about what was put underneath it.

What you should be able to do

  • Compute the percentage one amount is of another when the first is larger, and read the result as a multiple
  • Convert a percentage above 100 to a fraction and a decimal, and place it on a number line marked 0% to 400%
  • Express one shortfall two ways — as the percentage achieved and as the percentage still missing — and say why the two must add to 100
  • Recover the amount from a percentage above 100 of a known base
  • Distinguish "is 120% of" from "is 120% more than", and from "is 20% more than"
  • Decide, for a given situation, whether a percentage above 100 is meaningful or is a sign that the wrong base was used
  • Restate a percentage above 100 in the everyday language of multiples — twice, double, two and a half times

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
percentagea fraction whose denominator has been fixed at 100printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.1)
targetthe amount aimed at, used here as the quantity 100% refers toprinted in this chapter (Part II, §1.2, p.10)
basethe amount a percentage is measured againstprinted in this chapter (Part II, §1.3, p.15)
salesthe money taken in over a stated periodprinted in this chapter (Part II, §1.2, p.10)
harvestthe printed page gathered in a season, the quantity compared year to yearprinted in this chapter (Part II, §1.2, p.12)
decimala number written with digits after a pointprinted in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.4)
bar modela rectangle standing for the whole, marked off to show a partprinted in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.2)
timesthe everyday multiplier language the chapter sets beside percentages above 100printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.2, p.12)
overshootthe explanation's name for the amount by which a quantity passes its basean added term; the chapter draws the segment and does not name it
reference wholethe explanation's name for whatever 100% was chosen to stand foran added term, not printed

Where people slip up

  • "A percentage cannot be more than 100." Held very widely, and reinforced by years of test scores where it is true. The corrective is to ask what 100% names in each case: out of a maximum mark, nothing can exceed it; against a sales target, anything can.
  • "120% of the target means 120% more than the target." It means 20% more. The page's own phrasing on Part II p.11 gives both readings of Day 4 side by side.
  • **"200% means twice as much more."** 200% is twice — the whole, doubled, not the whole plus twice the whole. Part II p.12 pairs ₹10,000 with "twice", and that pairing is the correction.
  • "Because 40% + 60% = 100%, percentages always add to 100." Only the achieved and missing parts of one target do. Day 4 has no missing part at all, so nothing adds to 100 there.
  • "Ingredients could add to more than 100%." Not when each is a share of one stated total weight. Section 11 has to make the difference structural rather than a matter of taste, or students will apply the wrong intuition in both directions.
  • "150% of target — so multiply 5000 by 150." The inverse error, with the /100 forgotten. The 0%–400% bar with (0),(1),(2),(3),(4) beneath it exists precisely to keep the multiplier visible.
  • "9550 is nearly double 5000, so about 200%." It is 191%, and the drawn bar labels the overshoot as 4550 rather than as a percentage, which is an invitation to estimate before computing. Fine as an estimate; not fine as an answer.
  • "A percentage above 100 signals an error." Sometimes it does — and the test is whether the base is a whole containing the quantity or a yardstick beside it. Teach the test, not the taboo.
Transcript1,448 words

Here is a belief almost everybody holds, and it is wrong about half the time. A percentage cannot be more than a hundred. It feels obviously true. You cannot get more than every mark on a test, or eat more than all of a cake. And every percentage you meet for years obeys it, which is how a habit becomes a rule. So before testing it, be exact about what a hundred per cent means.

It means the thing you chose to measure against. That is all of it. And no law says a quantity must be smaller than the thing you chose to measure it against. So choose one out loud, and watch. A shop opens, and the owner sets a target. Takings of five thousand in a day. Five thousand is now what a hundred per cent means, for everything that follows. Notice that this was a decision. Nobody discovered it. The target could have been four thousand, or six.

A hundred per cent is not a property of the money. It is a label somebody attached to a number. Draw it as a bar. The full bar is five thousand, and the full bar is a hundred per cent. Day one. Takings of two thousand. Two thousand out of five thousand is two fifths, which is nought point four, which is forty per cent. Day two. Three thousand five hundred. That is seven tenths, nought point seven, seventy per cent.

Now say those same two facts the other way round. On day one he was sixty per cent short, on day two thirty. Forty and sixty. Seventy and thirty. Both pairs come to a hundred, and it is worth asking why they must. Because the target is one whole thing, made of the part he reached and the part he did not, and those two pieces make up the bar.

Day three. Five thousand exactly. Five thousand out of five thousand is one. One whole. A hundred per cent. The bar is full. Nothing is sticking out and nothing is missing. This is where the old belief feels safest, because here a hundred really does look like a ceiling. It is not a ceiling. It is a line. And a line is something you can be short of, level with, or past. Day three is the middle one of those three.

Day four. Six thousand. A thousand more than the target, and a thousand is a fifth of five thousand, which is twenty per cent. So the bar is the whole bar and then a fifth more. A hundred per cent plus twenty. A hundred and twenty per cent. The direct way lands in the same place. Six thousand over five thousand is six fifths, which is one point two, which is a hundred and twenty per cent.

Nothing broke. The bar simply ran past the line. And notice what day four does not have. It has no missing part at all. Ask what percentage he fell short by and there is no answer, because the question assumes something that is no longer true. Day five, seven thousand eight hundred. Day six, nine thousand five hundred and fifty. Those no longer fit a frame that stops at the target, so stretch the scale to ten thousand and mark two hundred per cent at the far end.

Day five sticks out past the line by two thousand eight hundred. Day six by four thousand five hundred and fifty. Estimate before you compute. Day six looks like nearly double, so call it roughly two hundred per cent. It is a hundred and ninety-one. The estimate was out by nine, which is a good estimate and a wrong answer. And day five is a hundred and fifty-six. Now run it backwards, because a percentage above a hundred is also an instruction.

Suppose he reached a hundred and fifty per cent of target. What did he take? A hundred and fifty per cent is one point five, and that times five thousand is seven thousand five hundred. Two hundred and ten per cent is two point one, and that is ten thousand five hundred. One mistake is worth naming, the commonest in the subject. A hundred and fifty per cent, so multiply five thousand by a hundred and fifty.

That gives seven hundred and fifty thousand, which is not a day's takings anywhere. It is exactly a hundred times too big, because the hundred in per cent got left out. Take a day of two thousand five hundred, and count the ways of saying so. He reached half his target. He reached fifty per cent of it. He reached nought point five of it. One number in three costumes, none more correct than the others.

Now take a day of ten thousand. He reached twice his target. He doubled it. He reached two times it. He reached two hundred per cent of it. That last one says what the three before it say, and it is the only one that makes anybody uneasy. Two hundred per cent is twice. Not twice as much again on top. Twice. Here are nine percentages, from fifteen at the smallest to three hundred and fifty-eight at the largest.

Six of the nine are past the hundred mark, and that is not an accident in the list. Every one has a fraction and a decimal. Two hundred and fifty per cent is five halves, two point five. Three hundred and five per cent is sixty-one twentieths, three point nought five. Now draw a line from nought per cent to four hundred, and under the ticks write nought, one, two, three, four.

That second row is the same information written twice. A percentage is a multiplier with the point moved. Ninety and a hundred and ten land either side of the one, a fifth apart, and neither is doing anything strange. So far the thing underneath has been a target. Here is a previous value instead. A field yielded two hundred and sixty kilograms one year, and six hundred and fifty the next.

Six hundred and fifty over two hundred and sixty is two and a half, which is two hundred and fifty per cent. This year is two hundred and fifty per cent of last year. Two and a half times it. The crop grew by three hundred and ninety kilograms, a third number different from both the others. Nothing here is a share of anything. Last year is not a container this year sits inside. It is a yardstick standing beside it.

Now the other case, because sometimes the ceiling is completely real. A snack packet, sixty-five grams, and the label lists what is inside. Potato seventy per cent. Oil twenty-four. Salt three. Spices three. Those four come to exactly a hundred, and they had to. Take each share of sixty-five grams and you get forty-five and a half, fifteen point six, and one point nine five twice, adding back to sixty-five.

Could one ingredient be a hundred and ten per cent? Only if another were minus ten, and there is no such thing as minus ten per cent of a packet. So here the ceiling is arithmetic. It is not disapproval. And that is the test, and it is the only thing worth taking away. Ask what a hundred per cent stands for. If it is a whole your quantity is part of, nothing can pass a hundred. If it is a yardstick beside it, anything can.

Which leaves the words, where this is actually lost. Take forty. A hundred and twenty per cent of forty is forty-eight. A hundred and twenty per cent more than forty is eighty-eight, because that adds a hundred and twenty per cent on top. And twenty per cent more than forty is forty-eight, the first answer again. So of it and more than it sit exactly a hundred apart, every time, on any base.

One last one. Demand for something falls by eighty-five per cent. Which of these six says the same thing? Is it eighty-five per cent of what it was? Eighty-five per cent more? Fifteen per cent of what it was? Is what it was fifteen per cent of it, or a hundred and eighty-five per cent of it? Or is it a hundred and eighty-five per cent of what it was?

Exactly one of those six is true, and it is the one saying fifteen per cent of what it was. Read the other way round, what it was is about six hundred and sixty-seven per cent of what it is now, and neither eighty-five nor a hundred and eighty-five comes into it.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab