PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 8 Mathematics · Chapter 1, Fractions in Disguise
Chapter 1 · Fractions in Disguise
The FDP trio: fraction, decimal and percentage as one object
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google11 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
A fraction, a decimal and a percentage are not three things you convert between. They are three ways of writing one number.
The idea
A fraction, a decimal and a percentage are not three things you convert between; they are three ways of writing one number, and the conversions are one step because our numerals are base ten. "Denominator 100" and "two places after the point" say the same thing, so 50/100, 0.5 and 50% are the same multiplier and multiplying by any of them is the same multiplication. The corollary is the useful part: the three notations are interchangeable, so you get to choose — and the right choice is whichever one makes the arithmetic in front of you disappear.
What you should be able to do
- Write any percentage as a fraction over 100, as that fraction in lowest terms, and as a decimal, and go in the reverse direction from any of the three
- Explain why finding 50% of a quantity and multiplying it by 0.5 are the same operation, not two methods with the same answer
- Complete a percentage / fraction / decimal table across values from 1% to 100%
- Say why the conversions are one step in base ten, and what would change in a system that was not base ten
- Identify which fractions give a decimal that stops and which do not, and explain why the chapter's percentages for those fractions are rounded
- Read a bar model of equal cells as a fraction, a percentage and a quantity at once
- Estimate a fraction as a percentage quickly enough to play a five-second game
- Choose the most convenient of the three notations for a given calculation, and justify the choice
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| fraction | a number written as one whole number over another | printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.1) |
| decimal | a number written with digits after a point, each place a tenth of the one before | printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.4) |
| percentage | a fraction whose denominator has been fixed at 100 | printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.1) |
| FDP | the chapter's abbreviation for the fraction–decimal–percentage trio | printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.2, p.8, as the heading "The FDP Trio") |
| base 10 | the fact that each place in our numerals is worth ten of the next | printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.4) |
| equivalent fraction | a different pair of numbers naming the same fraction | printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.1) |
| estimate | a value close enough to be useful, found before the exact calculation | printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.2, p.9) |
| bar model | a rectangle standing for the whole, marked off to show a part | printed in this chapter (Part II, §1.1, p.2) |
| terminating decimal | an added term for a decimal that stops after finitely many places | an added term for this topic; the chapter neither names nor discusses the distinction |
| recurring decimal | an added term for a decimal whose digits repeat forever | an added term for this topic; the chapter rounds such values without commenting |
| notation | the explanation's word for the choice of how to write a number | an added word, not printed here |
Where people slip up
- "0.5% and 0.5 are the same." They differ by a factor of 100. 0.5 is 50%; 0.5% is 0.005. This is the single most expensive slip in the whole percentage topic and it should be shown side by side, not just warned about.
- "To find 50% of something you must convert to a fraction first." The whole point of Example 2 is that the conversion has already happened — 1/2, 0.5 and 50% are one multiplier.
- "1% must be 0.1, because 10% is 0.1." Two of the eight table columns are designed to catch this: 10% and 1%. Fill them adjacently.
- "43% has a nice fraction." It has 43/100, and that is already lowest terms. Students hunting for a "nicer" form conclude they have made a mistake.
- "1/3 = 33%, exactly." 33% is 33/100, which is not one third. The chapter itself prints 33.33% for one third on Part II p.27 and 33% as a plain example of a percentage on Part II p.1 — an explanation must not let those two collide silently.
- "The book's 26.47% is wrong because my calculator says 26.470588." Neither is wrong; one is rounded. Section 6 has to make rounding a visible, deliberate act rather than an error.
- "The three notations are equally good and the choice does not matter." It matters constantly: 0.8 × 75 is easier than (80/100) × 75, but a quarter of 40 is easier than 0.25 × 40. Section 11 should be a decision, not a summary.
- "A percentage of a bar tells you the quantity." Only with the end label. In Q1(i) the same five-cell bar is annotated 20% under one cell on the left and 60 across four cells on the right — and that 60 means 60 only because the end label is 75. Note that no cell is shaded in either drawing, and 80% is never printed: four cells of five is 80%, but if the explanation wants that step it has to derive it.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 1.2 Q1, Figure it Out · 1.2 Q3, Figure it Out · 1.2 Q8
Transcript1,438 words
Write fifty per cent. Now write fifty over a hundred. Now write one half. Now write nought point five. Four different pieces of writing, and the claim of this whole video is that they are not four numbers. They are one number in four costumes, and nothing about it changes when it changes clothes. That is a slogan until you say what it has to mean. It has to mean that anything you do with one of them, you can do with any of the others and land on the same answer.
Not nearly the same. The same. And if that holds, moving between them is not a calculation. It is a change of handwriting. Test it on a number. Take twenty-four. Fifty per cent of twenty-four. Half of twenty-four. Nought point five times twenty-four. Twelve. Twelve. Twelve. One example proves nothing, so look at why rather than at that. Fifty per cent means fifty hundredths. Fifty hundredths reduces to one half. One half written as a decimal is nought point five.
At no point in that chain did the number move. Every step only rewrote it. So there was never a conversion and then a multiplication. There was one multiplication, written three ways. And if that is the pattern, ten per cent should have a decimal doing the same job. It does. Nought point one. Here is a table with three rows. Per cent. Fraction. Decimal. Eight columns across the top: fifty, a hundred, twenty-five, seventy-five, ten, one, five and forty-three.
The top row is filled in the whole way across. Underneath, exactly two cells are filled. Fifty over a hundred, and nought point five. Fourteen cells are blank, and every one is a number you already have. You are not being asked to work anything out. You are being asked to write a number you already know in a costume it is not wearing. That distinction is the whole topic.
So why is it a re-labelling and not a calculation? Because of how our digits are built. Take thirty-one per cent. That is thirty-one hundredths. Now look at where hundredths live in a decimal. First place after the point, tenths. Second place, hundredths. So thirty-one hundredths is nought point three one. The same digits, in the same order, in the place that already means hundredths. A percentage counts hundredths, and the second decimal place counts hundredths.
They were never two ideas that happen to agree. They are one idea with two spellings. Run it across every whole percentage from one to ninety-nine and it is the same number every single time. Now fill the table, and put two of those columns next to each other on purpose. Ten per cent is ten hundredths, which is one tenth, which is nought point one. One per cent is one hundredth, which is nought point nought one.
Those two look alike and are not alike, and writing them side by side is the cheapest protection there is. A hundred per cent is one whole thing. No hundredths are left over, so there are no places after the point. And forty-three per cent is forty-three hundredths, nought point four three, and a fraction that refuses to get tidier. Forty-three shares no factor with a hundred. If you went hunting for a neater form and could not find one, that was not a mistake. There is not one.
Now a shortcut that almost works, and almost is the dangerous part. Since a percentage is hundredths, people read a decimal by covering the point and taking the digits. Nought point four three. Cover the point. Forty-three per cent. Correct. Nought point two five, twenty-five. Nought point seven five, seventy-five. Nought point nought five, five. Nought point nought one, one. That is five of the eight columns, all correct. Now try nought point five. Cover the point, and it answers five per cent. It is fifty.
It is right exactly when the decimal has two places written out, and never otherwise. Nought point five has a second place. It is a nought, and nobody writes it. Which brings us to two things that look identical and differ by a factor of a hundred. Nought point five is fifty per cent. Nought point five per cent is nought point nought nought five. Put those side by side once and you never confuse them again.
And the digits stop being the percentage entirely once you go past the whole. One point two is a hundred and twenty per cent, and the digit after the point is a two. Two and a half is two hundred and fifty per cent, and the digit after the point is a five. Percentages above a hundred are not errors. They are simply more than the whole of the thing.
There is one place the smooth story gets rough, and it is better met head on. One third. Write it as a decimal and the threes never stop. So its percentage is thirty-three point three three, then more threes, forever, and every written version has been cut short somewhere. Which fractions do this? A decimal stops when the denominator is built only out of twos and fives. Twos and fives, because those are the factors of ten, and ten is what every decimal place is worth.
Four, five, eight, twenty, twenty-five, fifty. Those stop. Three, seven, nine, eleven, thirty. Those do not. So a percentage ending in a rounded tail came from the second kind, and the rounding is a decision, not an error. But there is a trap inside that test, and it is an easy one to fall into. The test has to be run on the fraction after it is reduced, not on it as it was handed to you.
Seventy-two over a hundred and fifty. That hundred and fifty carries a three, so you expect trouble. It reduces to twelve over twenty-five, and twenty-five is clean. Nought point four eight. It stops. Ninety-nine over a hundred and fifty reduces to thirty-three over fifty. Nought point six six. It stops as well. A hundred and thirty over three hundred looks like the same situation and is not. It reduces to thirteen over thirty, and the three survives.
Test the denominator as written and you are right most of the time, and wrong on exactly the fractions where reducing throws the awkward factor away. Now a picture that carries all three at once. A bar, cut into equal cells. Five cells. The whole bar is a hundred per cent, so one cell is twenty. Shade four and that is four fifths, which is eighty per cent. Write seventy-five at the far end and those four cells are sixty.
Change nothing except the label at the end, and the quantity changes while the percentage does not. Ten cells. One cell is ten per cent, six cells is sixty, and against ninety at the end, six cells is fifty-four. Four cells. One cell is twenty-five per cent, three cells is seventy-five, and against a hundred and forty, three cells is a hundred and five. The cell count fixes the fraction. The end label fixes the quantity. Neither one on its own tells you anything.
Attach a quantity and the three costumes start earning their keep. Sixty millilitres of orange paint, three quarters of it red. How much red? Three quarters of sixty. Seventy-five per cent of sixty. Nought point seven five times sixty. Forty-five millilitres, three times over, and you choose which of the three you actually do in your head. That is the part that gets missed. They are interchangeable, so pick whichever is easy.
Nought point eight times seventy-five beats eighty over a hundred times seventy-five. But a quarter of forty beats nought point two five times forty. Same number, different costume, and one costume makes the arithmetic disappear. One last thing, and it is the nicest thing here. An animal is offered two measures of food and eats one. The next day, three, and eats two. The day after, four, and eats three.
As fractions: one half, two thirds, three quarters, four fifths. As percentages: fifty, sixty-six point six seven, seventy-five, eighty. Keep going. On the ninety-ninth day it is offered a hundred and eats ninety-nine. Ninety-nine per cent. Every day is a bigger share than the day before, and not one of them ever reaches a hundred. Because exactly one measure is left behind every day, and one measure never changes. What changes is the pile it is left out of. One out of a growing pile is a shrinking share that never quite becomes nothing.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- Why forcing every fraction onto a scale of 100 makes them comparableClass 8 · Ch 1, Fractions in Disguise
- Computing a percentage in your head by splitting itClass 8 · Ch 1, Fractions in Disguise
Comes up again in
- What a percentage greater than 100 does and does not meanClass 8 · Ch 1, Fractions in Disguise
- Profit, loss and taxes as percentages of a stated amountClass 8 · Ch 1, Fractions in Disguise
- Compounding: why repeated growth multiplies instead of addingClass 8 · Ch 1, Fractions in Disguise