PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 8, Working with Fractions
Chapter 8 · Working with Fractions
A fraction of a fraction, and why the numerators and denominators multiply
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google9 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
That the numerators multiply and the denominators multiply is not a convention anyone chose. It is what a square forces on you.
The idea
That the numerators multiply and the denominators multiply is not a convention anyone chose — it is what a square forces on you. Cut a unit square into rows one way and columns the other, and the pieces count themselves: rows times columns, with no arithmetic performed. So the denominator of a product is a count of pieces the picture already made, and the numerator is a count of the pieces you kept. By the time the chapter writes the formula down it has stopped being a rule to remember and become a description of a picture — which is also why the same formula can be read as the area of a rectangle.
What you should be able to do
- Represent a fraction as a shaded part of a unit square
- Find a fraction of a fraction by cutting the shaded region again, in the other direction, and counting cells
- Say why cutting one way and then the other produces exactly (rows × columns) equal pieces
- State and use the rule for multiplying two fractions whose numerators are both 1, and explain the denominator from the picture
- State the general rule for multiplying two fractions, and attribute it to Brahmagupta's Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta of 628 CE
- Read such a product as the area of a rectangle built on the two fractions
- Rewrite a whole number as a fraction over 1 so that the same rule covers a whole-number factor
- Explain why the picture method stops being practical for fractions such as 1/12 and 1/18, and what replaces it
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| unit square | a square of side one unit, used to stand for one whole | printed in §8.1, p.177 |
| whole | the quantity a fraction is a fraction of | printed in §8.1, p.177 onward, and labelled inside Fig. 8.1 (p.178) |
| equal parts | the same-sized pieces a whole is cut into | printed in §8.1, pp.177–178 |
| rows and columns | the two directions of cutting, one for each factor's denominator | printed in §8.1, pp.178–181 |
| area | the amount of surface a region covers | printed in §8.1, p.180 |
| square units | the unit an area is counted in | printed in §8.1, p.180 |
| length and breadth | the two sides of a rectangle | printed in §8.1, p.180 |
| rectangle | a four-sided figure whose area here comes out as its two sides multiplied | printed in §8.1, p.180 |
| fractional units | fractions with 1 as numerator, whose product is 1 over the product of the denominators | printed in §8.1, p.181 |
| formula | a rule written in letters so that it covers every case at once | printed in §8.1, p.182 |
| Brahmagupta | the seventh-century Indian mathematician credited in the chapter with first stating the multiplication rule in general form | printed in §8.1, p.182 |
| cell | one small piece of the rows-and-columns picture | the explanation's word; not printed in this chapter |
Where people slip up
- "'Of' means add, or means divide." A fraction of a fraction is a multiplication, and the unit square is what shows it: the second cut lands inside the first shading, not beside it.
- "You multiply the denominators because that is the rule." The chapter never asserts it as a rule. Cutting into 5 rows and then into 4 columns produces 20 pieces because that is what crossing cuts do.
- "The whole changes when you cut again." It does not, and Fig. 8.1 is drawn so that this is visible: the outer square is the same square before and after the second set of cuts, which is why the answer is read against 20 and not against 8.
- "The multiplicand must be smaller than one whole." Fig. 8.2 is exactly the counter-case — the multiplicand is 3/2, drawn as a full square plus a half — and the same procedure runs unchanged.
- "6/20 and 3/10 are different answers." They are one number written two ways. The chapter records both on p.179 without comment, and simplification becomes the subject of Cancelling common factors before multiplying, not after.
- "Area is a formula for rectangles; this is fractions; they are different chapters." The chapter's point on p.180 runs the other way: the product of two fractions is an area, so a multiplication can always be drawn.
- "A whole number cannot go into the fraction formula." Writing it over 1 is not a trick to make the formula apply; it is a true statement about the number, and the chapter uses it on p.182 to retire the separate case handled in A whole number times a fraction, read as repeated distance.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 2 Q1, Figure it Out · 2 Q2, Figure it Out · 3 Q1, Figure it Out · 3 Q3, Figure it Out · 4 Q3
Transcript1,274 words
A tortoise covers a quarter of a kilometre in an hour. How far does it get in half an hour? You can probably answer that in your head. But look at what the question actually is. A half, times a quarter. Both of the numbers are fractions now. And neither of the two procedures we have will reach it. You cannot lay a quarter down half a time. And cutting a quarter into two equal pieces is a move nobody has made yet.
So we need a picture. And the picture turns out to do a great deal more than answer this. Here is a square. One unit along each side. It is going to stand for one whole. One hour, one kilometre, one anything. Everything from here on happens inside it, and — this is the part people lose — it never changes size. A quarter of a kilometre is a quarter of this square.
Cut it into four strips of the same height, and shade one of them. That shading is the quarter. Nothing clever has happened yet. Now the question. Half of that shading. Not half of the square. Half of the part that is already shaded. So cut the shaded strip in half, the other way, with a line straight down. Half of the shading is this left-hand piece. But how big is that piece, compared with the whole square?
To find out, carry the line all the way down, through every strip. And now look at what has happened to the square. Four rows, crossed by two columns. Eight pieces, every one of them the same size. One of them is shaded. One piece in eight. A half times a quarter is one eighth. And nobody multiplied anything. We counted. Two things about that are worth slowing right down for.
The first: the square never changed. It was one whole before that second cut, and it is one whole after it. So the answer is read against eight pieces, not against the four we started with. The second thing is the little word: of. Half of a quarter. The second cut landed inside the first shading. It did not go next to it. Nothing was added on. A fraction of a fraction is a multiplication, and that picture is the reason why.
Now a faster tortoise. Two fifths of a kilometre in an hour. And a longer walk. Three quarters of an hour. Same square, same job. Cut it into fifths this time. Five rows. Two of those rows shaded. That is the two fifths. Now for the three quarters, cut it the other way. Four columns. And count what the square is in now. Five rows, crossed by four columns. Twenty pieces.
Twenty. And nobody worked that out either. It is simply what five rows crossed with four columns gives you. Of those twenty pieces, the two shaded rows account for eight. Which is still the two fifths. Eight out of twenty. Now, a quarter of an hour is one of the four columns. So take the leftmost column of the shaded part. Two pieces. Two out of twenty. That is what a quarter of two fifths comes to.
But we want three quarters, so take three of the four columns instead. Six pieces out of twenty. Six twentieths. Or three tenths, which is the same number written smaller — and choosing between those two is a job of its own. Look again at where that twenty came from. It was not calculated. It was counted, off a picture that made itself. Cut a square into five rows. Then cut it into four columns.
You now have twenty pieces, because that is what crossing cuts do. I tried it for every pair of row and column counts up to twenty by twenty. Four hundred squares. Every one came out with rows times columns pieces. And every one added back to exactly one whole. So the number underneath a product is not a convention, and not something anybody decided. It is a count of pieces the picture has already made for you.
Now a case that looks like it ought to break all of this. A tortoise doing three halves of a kilometre in an hour, which is more than a whole kilometre. For five quarters of an hour, which is more than a whole hour. Draw the whole square, two rows crossed by four columns. Eight pieces. Three halves needs another half a square, so add four more pieces underneath. Twelve pieces in all, and the figure is three rows tall now.
A quarter of it is the leftmost column. Three pieces. Against a whole of eight, that is three eighths. Five of those columns is fifteen eighths. One whole, and seven eighths over. And nothing about the method had to change. Go back to the eight-piece square for a moment, and look at one piece on its own. It is a little rectangle. How long are its two sides? Half a unit one way. A quarter of a unit the other.
And its area, which is length times breadth, is one eighth of a square unit. Which is exactly the answer we counted off the picture. Eight copies of that rectangle fill the square, and eight eighths make one. So a product of two fractions is the area of a rectangle built on them. Which means a multiplication can always be drawn. A rectangle three and three quarters by nine and three fifths has an area of exactly thirty-six. Two sides that are not whole numbers, and an area that is.
So the picture always works. Now let me show you where it stops helping. One twelfth, times one eighteenth. The recipe has not changed. Eighteen rows, twelve columns. That is two hundred and sixteen pieces, and twenty-eight separate cuts to draw them all. The picture is not wrong — it is perfectly correct. It is just useless. Nobody is going to count two hundred and sixteen boxes. But look at what it would tell you if you did draw it.
One corner piece, out of twelve times eighteen of them. And there is the rule for fractions with a one on top. The bottoms multiply, because that is how many pieces there are. Now stop taking one piece, and take a block of them. Five twelfths, times seven eighteenths. Same square. Eighteen rows, twelve columns. Cut the seven eighteenths into twelve equal parts, and take five of the results. On the picture, that is a block five pieces wide and seven pieces tall.
Five sevens. Thirty-five pieces, out of two hundred and sixteen. And there is the general rule, sitting in the picture. The tops multiply because the block you kept is a rectangle of pieces. The bottoms multiply because that is how many pieces the square was cut into. Brahmagupta set that rule down in general form in the year six hundred and twenty-eight. Very nearly fourteen hundred years ago. One last tidying-up, and it retires something.
What about three times three quarters, where one of the two is a whole number? Three is a fraction. It is three over one. Three ones, if you like. And it sits in the same rule without complaint. Three over one, times three over four. Tops multiply: nine. Bottoms multiply: four. Nine quarters. Two whole ones and a quarter. And three fifths times four is three fifths times four over one. Twelve fifths.
So there is no separate rule for a whole number any more. There is one rule, and underneath it a square that shows you why.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- A whole number times a fraction, read as repeated distanceClass 7 · Ch 8, Working with Fractions
Comes up again in
- Cancelling common factors before multiplying, not afterClass 7 · Ch 8, Working with Fractions
- Why multiplying can make a number smallerClass 7 · Ch 8, Working with Fractions
- Restating a division as a missing-factor multiplicationClass 7 · Ch 8, Working with Fractions
- Reciprocals, and Brahmagupta's rule for dividing fractionsClass 7 · Ch 8, Working with Fractions
- Fractional relations between two quantitiesClass 7 · Ch 8, Working with Fractions
- Multiply as whole numbers, then count the decimal digitsClass 7 · Ch 4, Another Peek Beyond the Point