PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 9, Symmetry
Chapter 9 · Symmetry
Line symmetry and rotational symmetry are independent of each other
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google10 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
Folding and turning are separate tests. A figure can pass either, both, or neither, and all four really happen.
The idea
The chapter ends by insisting that a mirror line and a working turn are separate properties: each can hold without the other, so the word symmetric says nothing until you name which test was run. But separate is not unrelated — once a figure owns even one mirror line, its mirror lines and its turns come out equal in number, which is why the regular polygons, the Parliament outline and the Ashoka Chakra each give the same answer twice over.
What you should be able to do
- State the two tests separately and say what each one measures
- Give a figure with turns but no mirror line, and one with a mirror line but no turn
- Sort a set of figures into the four cases the chapter's closing statement names
- Explain why every angle whatsoever is an angle of symmetry of a circle
- Explain why every diameter of a circle is a line of symmetry
- Say why the circle is the exception to the rule about a smallest angle
- Count both the lines and the angles of symmetry of the same figure and compare the two numbers
- Sketch, or say why you cannot sketch, a figure meeting a stated combination of the two properties
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| reflection symmetry | the property of having at least one line of symmetry | §9.1, p.222 — printed in bold there |
| rotational symmetry | the property of having an angle of symmetry short of a full turn | §9.2, p.230 — printed in bold there, and settled in the Summary, p.241 |
| line of symmetry | a line the figure folds onto itself along | §9.1, p.219 — printed in bold and defined there |
| angle of symmetry | an angle of turn that leaves the figure looking untouched | §9.2, p.230 — printed in bold there |
| circle | the figure every turn about the centre leaves unchanged | §9.2, p.237 — the bold sub-heading on its symmetries |
| rim | the boundary of the circle | §9.2, p.237 — used there in constructing a diameter |
| diameter | a segment through the centre with both ends on the rim | §9.2, p.237 — printed there, and stated to be a line of symmetry |
| regular polygon | a many-sided figure with equal sides and equal angles | §9.2, p.239, Q8 — named there, from Chapter 1, §1.5, Table 3, p.10 |
| Ashoka Chakra | the twenty-four-spoked wheel of the national flag | §9.2, p.239, Q11 — named there |
| Koch Snowflake | the last of Chapter 1's shape sequences | §9.2, p.239, Q10 — named there; the sequence itself is printed in Chapter 1, §1.5, Table 3, p.10 |
| independent | said of two properties when either can hold without the other | the explanation's word for the relation between the two tests — not printed in this chapter |
Where people slip up
- "Symmetric means mirror-symmetric." The windmill kills this, and it is why the chapter spends a whole section on the distinction rather than a sentence.
- "If a figure has rotational symmetry it must have a mirror line too." A slanted parallelogram is the counterexample the chapter asks for at Q3(c), p.238: a half turn works, and no fold does.
- "If a figure has a mirror line it must have rotational symmetry." The trapezium strip of p.232 and the kite of Q3(d) both refuse.
- "A circle has one line of symmetry — the horizontal one." It has one through every point of the rim. The move from a diameter to every diameter is the whole content of section 8.
- "Every figure has a smallest angle of symmetry." The chapter says most do and the circle does not. Any angle you name, half of it also works — so there is no least one.
- "The number of lines and the number of angles are always equal." Only when there is at least one line. The windmill has four angles and no lines at all.
- "The counts are equal by coincidence." Section 11 gives the reason: fold across one mirror line and then across another, and the two folds together are a turn; fold and then turn, and that is a fold across some third line. So the mirrors and the turns match up one for one.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 4 Q2, Figure it Out · 4 Q3, Figure it Out · 4 Q7, Figure it Out · 4 Q10, Figure it Out · 4 Q11
Transcript1,390 words
There are two completely different questions you can ask about a shape, and people use the same word for both of them. First question: is there a line you can fold along, so that the two halves land exactly on each other? Second question: is there a turn, short of a whole turn, that leaves the shape looking untouched? Both of those get called symmetry. And here is what matters: they are separate questions.
A shape can pass one and fail the other, and it can happen either way round. So saying a shape is symmetric tells you nothing at all until you say which test you ran. Watch all four answers happen. Start with a paper windmill. Fold it upright: no. Flat: no. Corner to corner, either way: no. In fact no line anywhere on this page works, and that has been checked properly rather than guessed at.
Zero fold lines. By the folding test, this shape is not symmetric at all. Now hold the centre and turn it a quarter of the way round. It lands exactly on itself. Four angles of symmetry: ninety, a hundred and eighty, two hundred and seventy, three hundred and sixty. Four angles, no lines. Turns without a mirror. That is the first of the four cases. Now the other way round.
This strip has two parallel edges, the bottom one longer, and two ends leaning inwards. Fold it straight down the middle and the halves land on each other perfectly. One fold line. Now mark the centre and turn it a half turn. It comes back upside down, wide edge on top, sitting off the original. Turn it a half turn again and it is restored — but that is a whole turn in total, and a whole turn works on everything.
So no turn short of a whole one works. One line, no angles. A triangle with two equal sides behaves the same way: one fold line down the middle, and not a single turn. Third case, and this one is the familiar one. A square. Fold it upright: yes. Fold it flat: yes. Along one diagonal, and the other: yes and yes. Four fold lines. Now turn it a quarter: yes. A half: yes. Three quarters: yes. Four angles.
Four and four. It passes both tests, and it is because shapes like this one are the ones everybody meets first that people expect the two tests to travel together. They usually do. They do not have to. Hold on to that difference. Fourth case. A triangle with three different sides. There is no fold line: fold it whichever way you like and the halves never match up. And there is no turn either, because for the shape to land on itself a corner would have to arrive where another corner already is, and no two of these corners are alike.
Zero and zero. It fails both tests. Which is the ordinary situation, by the way. A cloud, a coastline, a scribble on a page — almost anything drawn without thinking about it lands in this box. Symmetry is the special case, not the usual one. Now put all four of those into a square of four boxes. Across the top: does it fold? Down the side: does it turn? Yes to both is the square. Turns only is the windmill. Folds only is the strip. Neither is the three-sided shape with nothing equal about it.
And every single box has something in it. That is the whole point of this video, and it is the one thing to carry away. The two properties are independent. Neither one forces the other, in either direction. Which is exactly why the word symmetric, on its own, is not a useful answer to anything. You have to say which test. Now a shape that breaks every pattern in this topic. A circle.
Turn it about its centre by a quarter turn: it lands on itself. By a fifth of a turn: yes. By one degree: yes. By seventeen degrees — and seventeen was ruled out for every other shape there is. By any angle you can name at all, including angles that are not whole numbers of degrees. Here is why. Every point of the rim is exactly the same distance from the centre, so turning slides each rim point along to another rim point.
Nothing can move off the rim, and nothing else was ever drawn. So the picture cannot change, whatever angle you use. Now try folding it. A line straight down the middle works, and the two halves land on each other. So far, so ordinary. But now pick any point at all on the rim. Join it to the centre, and carry the line on to the far side. That line is a diameter, and it is a fold line too, for the very same reason as before.
Folding across it keeps every point at the same distance from the centre, so every rim point lands on the rim again. And you can start from any point on the rim you like. So there are endlessly many diameters, and every single one of them is a fold line. Which makes the circle an exception to something we relied on earlier. For every other shape, the angles of symmetry are the multiples of one smallest angle, and that smallest angle goes into a whole turn exactly.
The circle has no smallest angle at all. Try to name one. Say a tenth of a degree. But then a twentieth of a degree also works, and it is smaller. Halve it again. And again. And again. There is never a least one to find, because halving never runs out. So a circle has angles of symmetry, endlessly many, and no smallest angle of symmetry. It is the one shape the rule cannot be applied to.
Now count both numbers for the same shape, and something starts to happen. Here is the outline of a building seen from above: a triangle with equal sides, with its three corners cut off. Three fold lines, and three angles. Three and three. Be careful with that one, though. Cut the corners at exactly the thirds and all six sides come out equal, and the answer jumps to six and six. Where you cut decides it.
A regular five-sided shape: five fold lines, five angles. Six-sided: six and six. Seven, eight, nine, ten — the same number twice, every single time. A wheel with twenty-four spokes: twenty-four fold lines and twenty-four angles, the smallest of them a whole turn shared twenty-four ways, which is fifteen degrees. Every one of those came out the same number twice. That is not a coincidence, and the reason is something you can follow.
Take a shape that has at least one fold line, and fix on one of them. Call it your fold. Now do your fold, and then do any turn that the shape has, one after the other. Both motions land the shape on itself, so the two of them together do as well. And that combination turns out to be a fold — across some different line. Different turns give you different folds. So every turn hands you a fold, and no two turns hand you the same one.
That pairs them off, one for one, which is why the two counts are equal. But look at what the argument needed: at least one fold line to start from. The windmill has none, nothing pairs off, and its counts are four and zero. One last shape, to test everything at once. Start with a triangle with equal sides. Three folds, three turns. Now push a bump out from the middle of every edge. What you get is a six-pointed star. Count again: six folds, six turns.
Do the same thing to every one of its twelve edges, and then again to all of those. The shape gets more and more jagged, and the counts stop moving. Six and six, from the second shape onwards, for ever. That is the Koch snowflake, and it behaves because every edge is treated exactly alike. So: two tests, four possible answers, one word doing the work of both, and one shape with no smallest angle at all.
Ask which test. It genuinely matters.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- A line of symmetry is a fold that makes the halves coincideClass 6 · Ch 9, Symmetry
- Why a figure can have several lines of symmetryClass 6 · Ch 9, Symmetry
- An angle of symmetry: turning a figure onto itselfClass 6 · Ch 9, Symmetry
- Counting the angles of symmetry of polygons and radial-arm figuresClass 6 · Ch 9, Symmetry
- Shapes come in sequences too, with rules of their ownClass 6 · Ch 1, Patterns in Mathematics
Either side of this one
- Numbering the floors below the ground: why zero needs another sideClass 6 · Ch 10, The Other Side of Zero