Slicing a disc into sectors to see where πr² comes from

These teaching notes are for members

What the video covers, what to say before it, where a class usually goes wrong, and what to set afterwards. An account is free, and it opens every chapter of every book.

Create a free account Sign in

What to assume they know

Why C/D is the same number for every circle — that circumference over diameter is a constant, so C = 2πr
From rectangle to parallelogram: area survives rearrangement — area of a parallelogram as base times height, and that congruent pieces have equal area and areas add
Perimeter as a walk around the border, and why perimeter-to-side ratios are fixed — that a ratio of two lengths in a figure survives scaling
Area of an equilateral triangle as (√3/4)a², or the ability to derive it
Squaring and comparing ratios, and reading a ratio like P² : A

What they should be able to do

Explain why the ratio of the square of a perimeter to an area is fixed for a family of scale copies, and compute it for a square and for an equilateral triangle
Deduce that the same must hold for circles, and identify what remains unknown after that deduction
State the Babylonian and Egyptian estimates of the circle's area constant, and convert each into the value it implies for π
State Archimedes' identification of the constant, and his comparison of a disc with a right-angled triangle
State and use the fact that a regular polygon's area is half its perimeter times the radius of its inscribed circle
Explain how letting the number of sides grow turns that polygon fact into the circle formula
Reconstruct Nīlakaṇṭha's slicing argument, and account for the base of the resulting parallelogram being half the circumference
Identify precisely what the slicing argument assumes, and say why it persuades without proving
Compute circle areas, and areas of composite figures built from discs and semicircles

Where it usually goes wrong

**"πr² and 2πr are two unrelated formulas that happen to share a letter."** They are the same fact twice. The slicing picture turns one into the other in front of you, and Archimedes' triangle does it in one line.
"Doubling the radius doubles the area." It quadruples it, because the radius is squared. The P² : A discussion on p. 144 is built to make squaring feel natural rather than arbitrary.
**"πr² means πr then squared."** The square is on the radius only. Writing it as π × r × r once, out loud, prevents a large fraction of the errors on this material.
"The ancients did not know the area was proportional to the square of a length." They did — that is exactly what the chapter's P² : A argument establishes, and what Babylon and Egypt were both estimating. What they lacked was the constant.
"The slicing argument is a proof." It is a persuasion, and the chapter's own wording is that it gives a way to argue. The arcs never actually become straight, and the step from "closer and closer" to "equal" is the part that needs the mathematics of later classes. Archimedes' route with inscribed and circumscribed polygons is the rigorous one, and the chapter has just described it.
"The number of circles in Q17 must change the fraction — four fit more tightly than three." It does not, and this is the most satisfying moment in the exercise set. The answer is π/4 for any count, which is why Q18 asks for a conjecture and a proof rather than three more calculations.
"Whether 256/81 was an improvement depends on the date." It does not. 256/81 from about 1500 BCE is a better value than the √10 the chapter records for 628 CE on p. 122. Accuracy and chronology are separate axes here, as they were in Cornering π: from inscribed polygons to Mādhava's exact series.

Questions to check understanding

Area of a circle from radius or diameter, and the reverse
Area of a circle from its circumference, and circumference from its area
Area of a composite region built from discs, semicircles and straight-sided pieces
Area of a ring between two concentric circles
Fraction-of-the-figure questions where the answer is independent of a count, with the independence to be proved
Given an ancient area rule, state the value of π it implies and compare it with the modern value
Explain, in words, why the constant in the area formula is the same as the constant in the circumference formula
State what the slicing argument assumes, and name the step that needs later mathematics

Examples worth working on the board

Inputs, not answers. Values marked Verified are worked out here; the chapter prints no answers and this volume has no appended answer key.

Why the problem mattered (p. 144). The chapter's own list: working out how much grain a cylindrical tower holds, since its cross-section is a circle; the ground taken up by a circular garden or building; and the needs of city planning and taxation. It also asks, in a Think and Reflect, why human beings took to circular shapes at all and whether the reasons were only practical.
The square's ratio (p. 144). Side a, perimeter 4a, area a². Verified: P² : A = 16a² : a² = 16 : 1, independent of a. Note the printed slip: the middle term is set as (4a²) : a² where it should read (4a)² : a². The next term is correct.
The equilateral triangle's ratio (p. 144). Side a, perimeter 3a, area (√3/4)a². Verified: P² : A = 9a² : (√3/4)a² = 36 : √3, and as a decimal about 20.8 : 1. Different from the square's 16 : 1, which is the point — the number belongs to the shape.
The circle's ratio, which the chapter asks for and does not evaluate (p. 144). Verified: C² : A = 4π²r² : πr² = 4π : 1 ≈ 12.566 : 1. Hold this back until after the historical values; it is the answer everybody was reaching for.
Babylon, well before 1500 BCE (p. 144). By measurement, the constant is close to 12, so the area rule was C²/12. Verified: the true value is 4π ≈ 12.566, so their 12 is low by about 4.5 %, and the implied value of π is 3 exactly.
Egypt, around 1500 BCE (p. 144), and the Śhulbasūtra (p. 145). The area taken as (8d/9)², where d is the diameter. With d = 2r this is (256/81)r². Verified: 256/81 = 3.16049, so the implied value of π is high by 0.0189 — better than Babylon's 3 by a wide margin, and, worth noting, better than the √10 ≈ 3.1622 that Brahmagupta adopted two thousand years later on p. 122. The chapter says the same rule appears in the Baudhāyana Śhulbasūtra of 800 BCE by way of a geometric construction of a square of approximately the circle's area, and that two different civilisations arrived at 256/81.
The Greek position (p. 145). They knew area over r² was some constant and did not know its value.
Archimedes, about 250 BCE (p. 145). He showed the constant is π itself — the same constant as in the perimeter formula — so A = πr². The chapter gives his own form of the statement: a circle has the area of a right-angled triangle whose two legs are the radius and the circumference. Verified: ½ × 2πr × r = πr².
Fig. 6.36 (p. 145). Three shaded regular polygons in a row — an equilateral triangle, a regular pentagon and a regular heptagon, an added count from the printed page — each with its centre marked O, its inscribed circle drawn dashed, and the radius r drawn from O perpendicular to the bottom side. The caption states the rule: a regular polygon's area is half its perimeter times that radius.
Why that rule holds, which the chapter only gestures at (p. 145). Join the centre to every vertex. Verified: the polygon splits into n congruent triangles, each with base one side and height r, so the total is ½ × (sum of the sides) × r = ½ × perimeter × r. The chapter says the proof extends the triangle-area-from-the-incircle formula, which is the same idea in a different order.
The limit (p. 146). Archimedes asked what happens as the side count grows. The perimeter tends to the circumference and r tends to the circle's radius, so the polygon area tends to ½ × 2πr × r.
Fig. 6.37 (p. 146), Nīlakaṇṭha's picture. Panel (A): a disc cut into thin sectors coloured alternately yellow and orange — I count twenty-four, from the printed page. Panel (B): the same sectors laid out in a long strip, alternately point-up and point-down, forming a near-parallelogram whose top and bottom edges are lines of arcs. The chapter attributes the argument to Nīlakaṇṭha Somayājī, about 1500, writing a commentary on the Āryabhaṭīya.
The slicing argument as printed (p. 146). As the slices get thinner the arcs approach straight lines, so the figure approaches a parallelogram with base half the circumference — the chapter puts a bracketed why? here — and height r. Then base times height gives πr × r.
**The answer to that why?, which the chapter withholds.** Verified: half the sectors point up and half point down, so each long edge of the strip is made of half of the arcs. Each arc's length totals the circumference across all of them, so each edge is half the circumference, πr. It is one sentence and the page deliberately leaves it to the reader.
Worked instances. Area of a circle of radius 7 cm with π as 22/7. Verified: 154 cm². Radius 14 cm: 616 cm². And backwards: a circle of area 154 cm² has radius 7 cm.
End-of-chapter Q17 and Q18 (p. 151), Figs. 6.45 and 6.46. Two rectangles each packed with equal circles in a single row — three circles in the first, four in the second — and the question in both cases is what fraction of the rectangle the circles cover. Q18 then asks for a conjecture, tested at ten, twenty and fifty circles, and then a proof. Verified: the fraction is π/4 ≈ 0.785 for every count, because n circles of radius r in a 2nr × 2r rectangle cover nπr² out of 4nr², and n cancels. The conjecture the chapter is fishing for is that the answer does not depend on the number of circles at all.
End-of-chapter Q22 (p. 152), Fig. 6.50. A square of side 2 units with four semicircles drawn inward on its sides, centred at the midpoints, making a four-petalled flower. Perimeter and area both wanted. Verified: each petal is bounded by two quarter arcs of radius 1, so the perimeter is 4π; each petal is two 90° segments, of area π/4 − 1/2 each, so the flower's area is 2π − 4 ≈ 2.28 out of the square's 4.
End-of-chapter Q25 (p. 153), Fig. 6.53. Two circles of radius r, each through the other's centre, with the overlap shaded red; find the area the two circles enclose between them. This is the area counterpart of §6.5's Example 1 and it uses this topic's formula plus the 120° arcs found there.
End-of-chapter Q23 (p. 152), Fig. 6.51. Two concentric circles about O; a chord BC of the outer circle, of length l, touches the inner circle at A; show the ring between them has area πl²/4. Verified: the tangency makes OA perpendicular to BC and A the midpoint, so R² − r² = (l/2)², and the ring is π(R² − r²) = πl²/4. A lovely question because R and r never need to be known separately.
End-of-chapter Q24 (p. 153), Fig. 6.52. Semicircles drawn outward on all three sides of a right-angled triangle; show the two on the legs total the one on the hypotenuse. Verified: each semicircle's area is (π/8) times the square of its side, so the claim is the Baudhāyana–Pythagoras theorem with a common factor of π/8 attached.

Figures to have open

Fig. 6.36 (p. 145), redrawn: three regular polygons with centre, dashed incircle and perpendicular radius, plus the triangulation from the centre that the caption's rule needs. The printed figure's incircles are schematic and in the triangle the dashed circle does not sit tangent to the sides; redraw them correctly, because the whole rule is about that tangency.
Fig. 6.37 (p. 146) as a single movement running from disc to strip, with a slider on the slice count so the strip visibly straightens. This is the topic's central figure and a static pair of panels wastes it.
A right-angled triangle with legs r and 2πr laid beside a disc of radius r, for Archimedes' own formulation. Standard schematic.
A rectangle packed with n equal circles, n adjustable, with the covered fraction displayed and staying at π/4. An added extension of Figs. 6.45 and 6.46 (p. 151), and the cheapest way to make Q18's conjecture obvious.
Fig. 6.51 (p. 152) redrawn with the tangency and the right angle at A marked, for the ring question.
Fig. 6.50 (p. 152) redrawn with the four construction circles shown faintly, so a petal is visibly the overlap of two of them.

Where this sits in the book

NCERT Ganita Manjari, Class 9 Mathematics (NCF-SE 2023), Chapter 6, §6.10 "Area of a Circle" (pp. 143–146), including the Think and Reflect on p. 144, the three scaling bullets on p. 144, the unnumbered subsection "The Familiar Formula in Use Today" (pp. 145–146) and the Nīlakaṇṭha passage on p. 146.
Figures 6.36 (p. 145) and 6.37 (p. 146).
End-of-chapter exercises Q17, Q18 with Figs. 6.45 and 6.46 (p. 151); Q22 with Fig. 6.50 and Q23 with Fig. 6.51 (p. 152); Q24 with Fig. 6.52 and Q25 with Fig. 6.53 (p. 153).
Chapter Summary (p. 154) carries the bullet A = πr².
Back-references inside the chapter: the constancy of the C/D ratio is §6.2 (p. 120), handled in Why C/D is the same number for every circle; the polygon-bounds history including √10 is pp. 121–122, handled in Cornering π: from inscribed polygons to Mādhava's exact series; the parallelogram area formula the slicing argument cashes in is §6.7 (pp. 130–132), handled in From rectangle to parallelogram: area survives rearrangement; the two-circles configuration of Q25 is §6.5's Example 1 (pp. 127–128), handled in Perimeter puzzles: composite curved boundaries reduce to arcs you already know.
The sector is §6.10.1 (pp. 146–147), handled in A sector's area is its angle's share of the whole.