PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 8 Mathematics · Chapter 5, Number Play
Chapter 5 · Number Play
Digital roots, and what survives repeated digit-summing
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google10 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
Summing a number's digits over and over destroys almost everything about it. Exactly one thing survives.
The idea
Summing a number's digits throws away almost everything about it — its size, its digit count, the order of its digits — and there is exactly one thing the operation cannot touch: how far the number sits past a multiple of nine. Each pass replaces the number by something differing from it by a multiple of nine, and each pass makes it strictly smaller, so the process is forced to stop and forced to stop somewhere carrying that same information. The single digit you land on is therefore a report on division by nine, with one twist worth understanding rather than memorising: a multiple of nine reports 9 and not 0, because the process has no way of arriving at 0.
What you should be able to do
- Compute the digital root of a number by summing digits repeatedly, and say when to stop
- Explain why the process always terminates
- Explain why summing digits leaves unchanged how far a number sits past a multiple of nine
- State what the digital root reports, and account for the value taken by multiples of nine
- Predict the digital roots of a run of consecutive numbers, and describe the cycle
- Predict the digital roots of consecutive multiples of a given number, and of numbers a fixed amount past a multiple
- Read the digital root of an expression off its parts, when some parts are multiples of nine
- Use digital roots to check an arithmetic calculation, and say what such a check can and cannot establish
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| digital root | the single digit reached by adding a number's digits again and again | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.130) |
| single-digit number | a number written with one digit, where the process stops | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.130) |
| remainder | what is left when a division does not come out exactly | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.116) |
| multiple | a number obtained by multiplying a given number by a whole number | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.116) |
| divisible | leaving nothing over on division | printed throughout this chapter |
| parity | whether a number is even or odd | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.1, p.113) |
| sequence | numbers generated one after another by a fixed rule | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.131) |
| conjecture | a claim put forward before it has been settled | printed in this chapter (Part I, §5.2, p.131) |
| digit | one of the ten symbols a number is written with | printed throughout this chapter |
| fixed point | the explanation's name for a value the procedure leaves unchanged | an added term; the chapter's process reaches one and does not name it |
Where people slip up
- "The digital root of a multiple of nine is zero." It is nine. The process can only stop on a digit it can actually reach by adding, and it never produces zero from a positive number. Nine and zero are the same position past a multiple of nine; nine is the representative this procedure hands you.
- "The digital root is the remainder." It reports the remainder for eight of the nine possible positions and reports nine where the remainder is zero. The chapter's two printed sentences, on Part I p.125 and p.130, say each half; a student who reads only one will be wrong a ninth of the time.
- "You can stop summing whenever the number looks small." You stop when one digit is left and not before. A student who stops at 11 or 29 has an intermediate value, not a root.
- "Bigger numbers have bigger digital roots." The root is one of nine values whatever the number's size. The eight-digit number in exercise 1 is stated to be eight digits precisely so the student can discover the digit count does not matter.
- "Rearranging a number's digits changes its digital root." It cannot — the digit total is unchanged. This links back to the reversal conjecture on Part I p.132.
- "Adding ten adds one to the root, always." Ten is one past a multiple of nine, so the root advances by one and wraps round after nine. The wrapping is the part students drop.
- "A digital-root check proves a calculation is right." It proves the two sides agree on their position past a multiple of nine. A wrong answer can survive it. The chapter says the method was used to check calculations, and it is worth being exact about what such a check is worth.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 3 Q1, Figure it Out · 3 Q2, Figure it Out · 3 Q3, Figure it Out · 3 Q4
Transcript1,333 words
Here is a six-digit number. Four hundred and eighty-nine thousand, seven hundred and ten. Add its digits. Four, eight, nine, seven, one, zero. That comes to twenty-nine. Twenty-nine is not a single digit, so do it again. Two and nine make eleven. Eleven is not a single digit either. One and one make two. Two. That is one digit, so you stop, and two is called the digital root of the number you started with.
Three passes. And the question worth asking is not how to do it. It is what on earth that two is telling you. First, why does it stop at all? Nothing in the instruction says it has to. It stops because every pass makes the number strictly smaller. A six-digit number is at least a hundred thousand. The most its six digits can possibly add to is fifty-four. So one pass drops it from six digits to two, and the pass after that has almost nothing left to work with.
Across nearly three thousand numbers, every pass came out smaller than the value before it, and every single number landed on one digit within three passes. Something that always shrinks and always stays positive has to stop. It is not lucky. It is forced. Now the important part. A pass throws away almost everything. It loses the size of the number. It loses how many digits it had. And it loses the order they were written in.
Shuffle the digits of our number and you get seven hundred and twenty different numbers, from fourteen thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine up to nine hundred and eighty-seven thousand four hundred and ten. Every single one of them has digital root two. So whatever survives all this, it is not size, and it is not order. Let us measure what one pass actually removes. Our number was four hundred and eighty-nine thousand seven hundred and ten, and its digits added to twenty-nine. The pass removed four hundred and eighty-nine thousand six hundred and eighty-one.
That amount is not arbitrary. It is fifty-four thousand four hundred and nine nines, exactly. And it is always like that. Across the sweep, every pass on every number removed an exact multiple of nine. The reason is how place value is built. Ten is one past a nine. A hundred is one past ninety-nine. A thousand is one past nine hundred and ninety-nine. So every digit contributes a run of nines plus one loose copy of itself. Adding the digits keeps the loose copies and throws the runs of nines away.
And throwing away a multiple of nine cannot change how far a number sits past a multiple of nine. That is the one thing that survives. Every pass leaves it exactly where it was. So the single digit you finish on is carrying that, and nothing else. Which makes the digital root a report on division by nine. Our number leaves two when you divide it by nine. Its digital root is two.
Across those same three thousand numbers, the root and the remainder agree two thousand six hundred and sixty-six times. Two thousand six hundred and sixty-six out of two thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine. So they disagree three hundred and thirty-three times. That is not a rounding error and it is not a rare exception. It is one case in nine. And the numbers where they disagree are exactly the multiples of nine.
Take any multiple of nine and run the procedure. You always land on nine. But a multiple of nine leaves nothing over when you divide by nine. The remainder is zero. So which is it? Nine, or zero? Both, and there is no conflict once you see why. Zero and nine are the same position past a multiple of nine. That position is the multiple itself. The procedure simply cannot hand you zero. It only ever adds positive digits together, so it has no way of arriving there.
Nine is the name this procedure gives that position. Nothing is broken, and nothing needs memorising. Now watch what happens along a run of numbers. Write twelve consecutive numbers starting from one, and take the root of each. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. And then one, two, three again. Nine values, and then it repeats. Start anywhere and the same thing happens. Starting from our six-digit number the roots run two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, one, two, three, four.
It is a ring of nine positions, and counting upwards walks you round it one step at a time. Different runs go round that ring at different speeds. Take consecutive multiples of three. Their roots go three, six, nine, three, six, nine. Three values, repeating. Multiples of six do the same thing. Six, three, nine, six, three, nine. Also three values. But multiples of four go four, eight, three, seven, two, six, one, five, nine.
All nine values, one visit each, before it comes back round. Three and six share a factor with nine and four does not, and that one difference is what decides whether a run visits three positions or all nine of them. Adding is easier still, once you think in positions rather than in numbers. Ten is one past a multiple of nine. So adding ten moves the root on by one.
A root of five becomes six. A root of nine becomes one, because the ring wraps round. That wrap is the part people drop. There is no tenth position to move to. Eleven is two past a multiple of nine, so adding eleven moves the root on by two, wrapping in exactly the same way. Start anywhere and keep adding eleven, and the roots step round all nine positions, two at a time.
Across the sweep, both of those held on every single number. This also lets you read a root off an expression without knowing what the letters stand for. Take nine a, plus thirty-six b, plus thirteen. Nine a is a multiple of nine whatever a is. Thirty-six b is a multiple of nine whatever b is. Both of them sit at the position that means nothing left over, so neither one moves the root at all.
Only the thirteen is left, and thirteen has digital root four. Try any pair of values you like. The answer comes out four every single time. Here is a riddle, described entirely by conditions. Every one of its digits is odd, and as small as an odd digit is allowed to be. And three separate things about it all come to the same value. How many digits it has, what its digits add up to, and its digital root.
That value is the largest odd single digit. Nine. The first condition pins every digit to one, because one is the smallest odd digit there is. So it has nine digits, and all of them are ones. They add to nine, and nine has digital root nine. Nine ones in a row. Every condition lands on nine at once, and no other number does it. One last thing, and it is about a thousand years old.
Aryabhata the second described this procedure, and it was used to check arithmetic before anyone had a machine to do it. Here is how. Multiply two numbers. Then take the root of each, multiply those two roots, and take the root of that. If your answer is right, the two must match. Over fourteen hundred and forty-four products, they matched every time. So a mismatch proves the calculation is wrong. That is genuinely useful and costs almost nothing.
But a match proves much less than it looks like it proves. It only shows the two sides agree on their position past a multiple of nine, and an answer that is wrong by exactly nine agrees perfectly. Wrong by one gets caught. Wrong by nine walks straight through. Know which of those the check is telling you.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- The digit-sum test for 9, and the algebra underneath itClass 8 · Ch 5, Number Play
- Why the same digit sum also settles divisibility by 3Class 8 · Ch 5, Number Play
Either side of this one
- Divisibility by 6 and other numbers, checked through their factorsClass 8 · Ch 5, Number Play
- Cracking a cryptarithm by reasoning about digits, not guessingClass 8 · Ch 5, Number Play