PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 1, Large Numbers Around Us
Chapter 1 · Large Numbers Around Us
Crores and millions: one number, two naming systems
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google9 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
A lakh is not a million and a crore is not a billion. The difference is not a table to memorise — it is where the commas fall.
The idea
The two systems do not disagree about the number. They disagree about where to cut it. One groups the digits three, then two, then two; the other groups them three at a time all the way. Because the cuts land in different places, the same run of digits acquires two entirely different sets of names — and that is why lakh and million are not counterparts and 500 lakhs is not 5 million. To compare across the systems you have to re-cut the digits, not translate the words.
What you should be able to do
- State how many zeros follow the 1 in a lakh, a crore, a million, a billion and an arab
- Insert commas into an unpunctuated digit string in both systems and read the result aloud in each
- Convert a number given by its Indian name into digits, and by its American name into digits
- Explain why the grouping, not the number, is what differs between the systems
- Compare a quantity named in one system with a quantity named in the other by converting both to a common unit first
- State the "hundred times" chain that links thousand, lakh, crore and arab, and the "thousand times" chain that links thousand, million and billion
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| crore | a hundred lakhs, written 1,00,00,000 — a 1 with seven zeros after it | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.2, p.8) |
| arab | a hundred crores, written 1,00,00,00,000 — a 1 with nine zeros after it | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.3, p.8) |
| million | a thousand thousands, and the same size as ten lakhs | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.3, p.8) |
| billion | a thousand millions, and the same size as one arab | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.3, p.8) |
| Indian System | the naming and comma scheme that groups three digits, then two at a time | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.3, p.8) |
| American System | the naming and comma scheme that groups three digits at a time throughout | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.3, p.8) |
| International system | the chapter's alternative name for the American system | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.3, p.8) |
| lakh | a hundred thousand, written 1,00,000 | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.1, p.1) |
| comma | the mark that separates the groups and tells you where a name changes | printed in this chapter (Part I, §1.1, p.4) |
| group of digits | a run of digits between two commas, carrying one name | an added compound, not printed in this chapter; the chapter describes the grouping without naming a run of digits |
Where people slip up
- "A lakh is the Indian word for a million." It is not: a million is ten lakhs. This single substitution wrecks every cross-system comparison a student will meet.
- "A crore is the Indian word for a billion." A crore is ten million; a billion is a hundred crores. The chapter's own comparison item, 640 crore against 60 billion, is built on exactly this error.
- "Changing the commas changes the number." It changes only how the number is read aloud. The digits never move.
- "Indian commas go every three digits, like the American ones, just shifted." No — the first comma is after three digits, and every comma after that is after two.
- "Ten lakhs and a million are different quantities because they have different names." They are the same quantity. The chapter's table prints them on one row for exactly this reason.
- "You can compare by comparing the names." You compare by converting both to one unit. Names are labels attached to different-sized groups.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 1.3 Q1, Figure it Out · 1.3 Q2, Figure it Out · 1.3 Q3, Figure it Out · 1.6 Q8
Transcript1,257 words
Here is a button. Every time you press it, it adds ten lakh. Ten lakh is a one with six zeros after it. Press it once and the screen shows ten lakh. Press it twice, twenty lakh. Keep pressing. Fifty lakh. Eighty lakh. Ninety lakh. Press it a tenth time, and the screen shows a hundred lakh. That quantity has a name of its own. A hundred lakh is one crore.
Written out, a crore is a one followed by seven zeros. And that is where this starts, because a crore is about to meet a word that looks like its twin and is not. Here is a string of digits. Nine, eight, seven, six, five, zero, one, two, three, four. Ten digits in a row, and almost impossible to read. That is what commas are for. They cut the digits into groups, and each group takes a name.
But there are two different ways to make the cuts, and both of them are correct. The first way puts a comma after three digits from the right, and then after every two. The second way puts a comma after every three digits, all the way along. Same digits. Same number. Two different sets of cuts. And once the cuts land in different places, the groups pick up completely different names.
Let's put the two rules side by side. The Indian system: three, then two, then two, then two. The American system, which is also called the international system: three, three, three. Notice where they agree. Both put the first comma after three digits from the right. That is the thousands comma, and it is in the same place either way. After that they part company completely. And it is worth saying what this is not. The Indian commas are not the American ones shifted along.
It is a different rule. Three and then twos, against threes the whole way. Now watch what those cuts do to the names. A thousand is a thousand in both. Ten thousand is ten thousand in both. Add one more zero and they split apart. One side calls it a lakh. The other calls it a hundred thousand. Another zero. Ten lakh here. A million there. Another. One crore, against ten million.
Another. Ten crore, against a hundred million. And one more. One arab, which is also a hundred crore, against one billion. Now look down the middle of that ladder. The digits are identical on every single row. Nothing about the number changed. Only where we cut it, and what we called the pieces. So let's get the sizes straight by counting zeros. A lakh is a one with five zeros.
A million is a one with six. A crore is a one with seven. An arab is a one with nine, and so is a billion. Those two are the same size. Five, six, seven, nine. Those four counts settle almost every question in this topic. Here is one immediately. How many zeros are there in a thousand lakh? A lakh has five. A thousand of anything adds three more. Eight zeros.
And a hundred thousand? Five zeros. Which means a hundred thousand is exactly one lakh. There is a pattern hiding in those zero counts, and it runs differently on each side. Climb the Indian ladder. Thousand, lakh, crore, arab. A lakh is a hundred thousands. A crore is a hundred lakhs. An arab is a hundred crores. A hundred times, at every single step. Now climb the other one. Thousand, million, billion.
A million is a thousand thousands. A billion is a thousand millions. A thousand times, at every step. Two ladders up the same wall, with the rungs at different heights. That is the entire reason the names never line up, and every confusion in this topic comes out of it. Let's read a real number out loud, twice over. Nine, eight, seven, six, five, zero, one, two, three, four. Cut it the Indian way, and the groups are nine, eighty seven, sixty five, zero one, and two three four.
Read them off: nine arab, eighty seven crore, sixty five lakh, one thousand, two hundred and thirty four. You can also say it without the arab. Nine hundred and eighty seven crore, sixty five lakh, one thousand, two hundred and thirty four. Same number. Now cut those same digits the other way. The groups are nine, then eight seven six, then five zero one, then two three four. Read them off: nine billion, eight hundred and seventy six million, five hundred and one thousand, two hundred and thirty four.
Two completely different sentences, and not one digit moved. So where do these names come from? Lakh and crore come from Sanskrit, and they are not used only in India. The same system is used right across the region. Nepal and Bhutan, Bangladesh and Myanmar, Sri Lanka and the Maldives, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Millions and billions are used across a great many countries too, which is why that system also gets called the international one.
Neither of them is more correct than the other. They are two conventions for cutting up the same digits. The digits are the number; the commas are punctuation. But punctuation starts to matter the moment you try to compare two quantities that were named in different places. So here is the skill that actually matters. Which is bigger: five hundred lakh, or five million? The names give you no help at all. Five hundred certainly sounds bigger than five.
So do not compare the names. Convert both to plain digits first. Five hundred lakh is five crore, which is a five with seven zeros. Five million is a five with six zeros, which is fifty lakh. Five crore against fifty lakh. The first one is ten times the second. Convert, then compare. Never compare the labels. Which brings us to the two mistakes that do the most damage. The first one is treating a lakh as the Indian word for a million.
It is not. A million is ten lakh. They are a factor of ten apart. The second is treating a crore as the Indian word for a billion. Also wrong, and wrong by more. A billion is a hundred crore. A crore is ten million. If you want the true partners, here they are. A million sits opposite ten lakh. A billion sits opposite one arab. Those pairings are exact. Lakh and million are not a pair, and crore and billion are not a pair.
Fifty lakh and five million, on the other hand, are the same crowd of people. One last thing, about the top of the ladder. We stopped at arab and billion, and that is not because numbers stop there. Both systems carry on upwards with more names, and those come later. What does not change is the idea underneath all of it. A number is a run of digits. The commas are a reading aid, and different places read them differently.
So whenever you meet one quantity named one way and another named the other way, do the same three things. Write both in digits. Line up the zeros. Then compare. Here is a question to leave you with. How many lakh are there in one billion? You have everything you need. A billion is a one with nine zeros, and a lakh is a one with five. Work that out. Then say the size of a crowd of ten million people twice, once in each system.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- What it actually takes to make one lakhClass 7 · Ch 1, Large Numbers Around Us
- The Land of Tens: each place is ten of the one beforeClass 7 · Ch 1, Large Numbers Around Us
Comes up again in
- When an approximate answer is the better answerClass 7 · Ch 1, Large Numbers Around Us
- Rounding to a nearest neighbour, and choosing which oneClass 7 · Ch 1, Large Numbers Around Us
- Answering "could this possibly fit?" by estimating in stagesClass 7 · Ch 1, Large Numbers Around Us
- Rival ways of splitting off the fractional part, and why the point wonClass 7 · Ch 3, A Peek Beyond the Point