PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 7, Finding the UnknownPrepShorts

Chapter 7 · Finding the Unknown

Isolating the unknown, step by step

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Solving equations systematically10 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

10 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

“Take it across and change the sign” is not a rule about crossing an equals sign. It is what is left of doing the same thing to both sides.

The idea

The shortcut everybody remembers — take it across and change the sign — is not a rule about crossing an equals sign at all. It is the two-line version of doing the same thing to each side, with the middle line rubbed out. This chapter is unusual in printing both versions in adjacent columns rather than replacing one with the other, and the reason shows up immediately: a student who has only the shortcut will happily "move" a factor as though it were a term, and most of the mistakes the chapter later asks you to hunt down are that same detachment of the shorthand from its reason.

What you should be able to do

  • Solve an equation whose unknown appears on both sides, by first collecting it on one side
  • Handle a subtracted negative term correctly when isolating the unknown
  • Set the full form and the shortened form of the same solution side by side and say which line was dropped
  • State the three printed observations governing the shorthand for a term, a factor and a divisor
  • Explain why a term changes sign when it moves but a factor does not
  • Solve an equation containing a bracket by at least two different routes
  • Produce an equation with no solution, and an equation whose solution is zero
  • Check a found value and say what the check does and does not settle

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
additive inversethe number that adds to a given number to give zeroprinted in Part II, §7.2, p.173
terma piece of an expression joined to the rest by adding or subtractingprinted in Part II, §7.2, pp.169, 173
factora piece of a product joined to the rest by multiplyingprinted in Part II, §7.2, pp.169, 173
divisorthe number an expression is being divided byprinted in Part II, §7.2, p.173
productthe result of multiplying, and the shape one side may takeprinted in Part II, §7.2, p.173
quotientthe result of dividing, and the shape one side may takeprinted in Part II, §7.2, p.173
inverse operationsoperations that undo each otherprinted in Part II, §7.2, pp.169, 172
letter-numbera letter used in place of a number whose value is not yet knownprinted in Part II, §7.1, p.167, and again in §7.2, p.168 and §7.3, p.181
no solutionsaid of an equation no value of the letter can make trueprinted in Part II, §7.2, p.172
simplifyingrewriting one side in a shorter equivalent form before solvingprinted in Part II, §7.2, p.177
transpositionthe usual name elsewhere for moving a term across the equals signnot printed in this chapter — all 28 printed pages, 164 to 191, were read; the chapter describes the move as removing a term and never labels it
isolating the unknowngetting the letter alone on one sidethe explanation's phrase; the book asks instead to retain only the unknown on one side

Where people slip up

  • "Move it across and change the sign." Correct as far as it goes, and the chapter does end up writing exactly that shape — but only after deriving it. Say the derivation out loud every time in the explanation, because the sign flip is a consequence of subtracting the same term from each side, not a rule about crossing a line.
  • "So a factor changes sign too when it moves." This is the wrong generalisation the shortcut invites, and observation (b) is printed to head it off: 2y = 14 becomes y = 14 ÷ 2, not y = 14 − 2. Error card 3 on p.181 makes exactly this mistake: in 2v − 4 = 6 the 2 leaves the left as a division, since 2v becomes v, and lands on the right as a subtraction, since 6 becomes 6 − 2. Card 1 is the same detachment committed with a term, and in the other direction — there the term crosses the equals sign and keeps its sign instead of flipping. Say which way round each card fails; calling them "matching" invites a teacher to describe card 1 as a sign that wrongly changed, which is the opposite of what it does.
  • "Subtracting a negative is the same as subtracting." Example 5 turns on 61 − (−5) = 66. Slow the figure down at that step.
  • "There is a correct order of operations for solving." Example 10 prints three orders side by side and all three work. What matters is that each line follows from the one above by an operation applied to each side.
  • "Every equation has a solution." Question 2 on p.172 asks for one that does not, and 5s = 3s in question 1 has the solution students most often refuse to write down, which is zero. Both belong in the explanation.
  • "Simplifying and solving are the same step." Column 3 of Example 10 opens by multiplying out a bracket — that changes the form of one side, and no operation is applied to the other. Distinguish a rewrite of one side from a move applied to both.
  • "Once I get an answer I am done." The chapter puts a checking prompt after Example 5 and again after Example 6. A check costs one substitution and catches exactly the sign slips this topic is about.
Transcript1,349 words

Somewhere along the way you were handed a rule. Take it across the equals sign, and change its sign. And it works. Two y plus seven equals twenty one becomes two y equals twenty one take seven. The seven was a plus on the left. It arrives on the right as a minus. Nobody ever says why. That silence costs something, because the same instruction used on the wrong kind of piece gives the wrong answer.

So here is what the rule actually is: one line of working, with the line above it rubbed out. This video puts that line back. Start with one that has a trap in it. Eleven y, plus negative five, equals sixty one. To clear that negative five, take negative five away — from both sides, because that is the only move allowed. On the left, negative five take negative five leaves nothing. Eleven y.

On the right, sixty one take negative five. Slow down here. It is not fifty six. Taking away a negative makes the number bigger. Sixty six. Eleven y equals sixty six, and eleven sixes are sixty six, so y is six. Or divide each side by eleven and get the same six. Both finishes are the same move. Now one where the letter is on both sides. Six y plus seven equals four y plus twenty one.

There is nothing to isolate yet, because y is in two places. So take four y off each side. The right side loses its y altogether. Two y plus seven equals twenty one. Take seven off each side. Two y equals fourteen. Halve each side. y equals seven. Check it. Six sevens and seven is forty nine. Four sevens and twenty one is forty nine. Now watch that same solve written out twice, side by side.

On the left, every operation is written under both sides, the way we just did it. On the right, only the results are written down. Same equation. Same answer. Same number of lines. The difference is the working underneath, and the right hand column simply does not show it. That is the whole of the shortcut. Take it across and change the sign is not a different method. It is this method, with one line rubbed out.

Look at what leaves, and what it turns into on the way. Two y plus seven equals twenty one becomes two y equals twenty one take seven. The seven was joined to its side by adding. To get rid of something that was added, you add its opposite. Seven and negative seven make nothing. So you add negative seven to the left, and you must add negative seven to the right too.

The right side was twenty one. Now it is twenty one take seven. That is where the minus comes from. It is not a sign changing because it crossed a line. It is the opposite of the thing that was added. Next line. Two y equals fourteen. The two is not added to anything. It is multiplying. So follow the rule you were given: take it across, change the sign.

y equals fourteen take two. y equals twelve. Put twelve back. Twice twelve is twenty four, and twenty four is not fourteen. The undo of multiplying by two is dividing by two, not subtracting two. y equals fourteen divided by two. Seven. And doubling a number and adding two to it do agree at exactly one number, which is two. That is why this mistake survives so long. One more shape. u over fifteen equals six.

Here the fifteen is dividing. The undo of dividing by fifteen is multiplying by fifteen, on both sides. u equals six times fifteen. Ninety. Check it. Ninety over fifteen is six. And if you had added fifteen instead, you would have twenty one. A fifteenth of twenty one is not six. The fifteen came up from under the line as a multiplication, and no sign changed anywhere. Put the three of them next to each other.

A term is joined to its side by adding, so it leaves as its opposite. A factor is joined by multiplying, so it leaves as a division. A divisor is dividing, so it leaves as a multiplication. Only the first of the three has anything to do with a sign. The plus becomes a minus because the undo of adding is adding the opposite — and for no other reason.

Nothing flips because it crossed the equals sign. If that were the reason, the factor would flip too, and we have just watched it not. Now a bigger one, and three people solving it at once. Twenty eight, bracket x plus four, plus three hundred, equals one thousand. The first takes three hundred off each side, then divides each side by twenty eight, then takes four off each side. The second notices that twenty eight, three hundred and one thousand all divide by four.

So they quarter the whole equation first, reaching seven brackets plus seventy five equals two hundred and fifty, and finish the same way. The third opens the bracket before anything else, reaching twenty eight x plus four hundred and twelve, then takes four hundred and twelve off each side and divides by twenty eight. Three different orders. All three land on x equals twenty one. There is no correct order. There is only the rule that each line follows from the one above by an operation applied to both sides.

Two strange ones now, and they are strange in opposite directions. Build an equation that no number at all can satisfy. Take a number and add four. Take the same number and add five. Set those equal. x plus four equals x plus five. Take x off each side and you are left with four equals five. Whatever x is, the right hand side is exactly one more than the left. Always one more.

So there is nothing to find. Not a hard answer — no answer. Solving can come back empty, and that is a result, not a failure. The other strange one looks almost identical, and it is not. Five s equals three s. Take three s off each side. Two s equals nothing at all. So s is zero. That is the answer people refuse to write down. It looks like the equation collapsed.

It did not. Zero is a number, and it is the only number that works here. Try any other and the two sides differ. An empty answer and an answer of zero look alike on the page and are opposites. Which brings us to the cheapest habit in the subject. Three u take seven equals two u plus three. Take two u off each side, add seven to each side, and u is ten.

Now check it. On the left, thirty take seven is twenty three. On the right, twenty plus three is twenty three. They agree. That check cost one substitution, and it catches exactly the sign slips this video is about. But be clear what it settled. It settled ten. Try nine and the sides come out twenty and twenty one. A check confirms the value you put in, and says nothing about any other.

Two solutions now, each with one line wrong, failing in opposite directions. Three x take ten equals thirty five. Someone writes three x equals thirty five take ten. Twenty five. But the ten was being subtracted, so it arrives on the right as a plus. Forty five, and x is fifteen. That one failed to flip when it should have. Two v take four equals six. Someone writes v take four equals six take two.

The two is a factor. It leaves as a division, not as a sign change. Two v equals ten, and v is five. That one flipped when it should not have. Both were the shortcut used with its reason removed, and both were caught by one substitution. The rule is fine. Just keep the line above it where you can see it.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

The book

Open in a new tab