PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 7, A Tale of Three Intersecting LinesPrepShorts

Chapter 7 · A Tale of Three Intersecting Lines

Constructing from two angles and the side between them

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Constructing from sides and angles9 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

9 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

Two sides with the angle between them can never fail. Two angles with the side between them can — and the reason is not the one you expect.

The idea

This construction can fail, and the surprise is what decides it. The side you are given — the one thing here with a length — turns out to be irrelevant: lengthen it or shorten it and the two arms still meet, or still do not. What decides is the pair of angles alone, and the chapter finds the exact cut-off by pushing one arm until it stops meeting the other, at which instant the two arms are parallel. The parallel-line rule from Part I, Chapter 5 then reads off the boundary value, and a limiting position that is not itself a triangle is what tells you which triangles exist.

What you should be able to do

  • Identify which side is included between two named angles of a triangle
  • Construct a triangle from two angles and their included side
  • Explain why two base angles that are each at least 90° cannot produce a triangle
  • Explain why the two arms cease to meet exactly when they become parallel
  • Use the transversal rule to obtain the boundary value of the second angle for a given first angle
  • State the existence condition as a requirement on what the two given angles total
  • Decide for a given pair of angles whether a triangle exists, and give the totalling that decides it
  • Argue that the included sidelength plays no part in whether the triangle exists
  • Observe that fixing two angles fixes the third, whatever the included side

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
included sidethe side that both of the two given angles are drawn onprinted as part of the §7.3 sub-heading, p.161, and in the text on p.161
base anglesthe two angles at the ends of the side taken as baseprinted on p.162
parallelsaid of two lines in a plane that never meetprinted on p.163 and again on p.164; p.162 sets the same question up using the word inclined instead
transversala line cutting across two othersprinted on p.163 and again on p.164
right anglean angle of 90°printed on p.162
acute anglean angle smaller than a right angleprinted on p.162 and again on p.170
anglethe opening between two rays that share an endpoint, measured in degreesprinted throughout, from p.146
vertexthe corner point of the triangle; here the point where the two arms meetprinted on p.146 and again on p.161
basethe side drawn first; here always the given included sideprinted on p.161
line segmenta piece of a line with two endpointsprinted on p.161 and again on p.167
boundary casethe arrangement that separates the pairs of angles that work from those that do notan added term; the phrase is not printed in this chapter, though the situation is drawn in blue on p.163

One caution: The chapter never abbreviates this construction to a three-letter code; nothing of the ASA kind is printed anywhere in it. A teacher who introduces one is adding vocabulary from outside the book and should say so.

Where people slip up

  • "A longer base gives the arms more room to meet." The chapter kills this explicitly on p.163. Lengthening the base slides the two arms apart but tilts neither, so a pair that meets still meets and a pair that misses still misses. The figure in section 10 has to make that visible.
  • "If one of the two angles is 90°, there is no triangle." 90° with 85° works — their total is under 180°. The failure needs both angles to be at least 90°, or one large enough to make up the difference. The printed pair on p.163 is there to catch exactly this error.
  • "The two arms are parallel, so that is the case where they meet at the very last moment." Parallel arms do not meet at all. The parallel position is the first arrangement that fails, and the chapter's phrasing puts it on the failing side: at 140° and above there is no triangle. Get the inequality the right way round.
  • "Two angles are not enough to pin a triangle down." They pin its shape down completely, and the third angle with it — as section 12 shows. What they do not pin down is its size. That distinction is worth naming even though this chapter does not.
  • "Failing means the arms cross on the wrong side of the base." In the chapter's picture the arms are drawn upward from the base and either meet above it or never meet. Extending them backwards is a different figure and not what is being constructed.
  • "The rule must involve all three angles." The test uses only the two given ones. That is what makes it usable before any third angle exists.
Transcript1,372 words

There is more than one way to be handed a triangle. One way is two sides, with the angle sitting between them. Two lengths and an angle. Here is the other way round. Two angles, and one side. Forty degrees at one end, five centimetres of base, fifty degrees at the other end. It reads like the same kind of instruction, and it very nearly is. But there is one difference between them, and it is a large one.

That first construction can never fail. This one can. And what decides whether it fails is not the thing you would expect. First, which side is the included one. Take a triangle, and pick two of its angles. Say the ones at A and at B. The side running between those two corners is A B, so A B is the included side. Now pick a different pair. The angles at B and at C.

Those two stand at the ends of B C, so the included side moves to B C. Same triangle, different pair, different side. So the side is not fixed either. It is whichever side has both of the chosen angles standing on it. Which makes the first job an easy one to get wrong, and worth doing before you draw anything. Three of them, and each is written the same way.

An angle, a length, an angle. Forty degrees, five centimetres, fifty degrees. Thirty degrees, four centimetres, forty-five degrees. Twenty degrees, six centimetres, fifty degrees. That last one is drawn awkwardly on purpose. Its given side is neither at the bottom nor horizontal. Which is exactly the point. You cannot look for the flat side underneath and call that the base. Find the side that both marked angles are standing on. That is the base, whichever way up it happens to sit.

So let us build one properly. A B is five centimetres. The angle at A is forty-five degrees, and the angle at B is eighty. Step one. Draw the base, five centimetres, and mark the ends A and B. Step two. Protractor at A, and an arm at forty-five degrees, going up from the base. Step three. Protractor at B, and an arm at eighty degrees — measured from B A this time, not from A B.

Both arms lean inwards, towards each other. Extend them until they cross, and that crossing point is C. One length and two angles went in, and there is the triangle. Now look carefully at where C came from. You did not measure to it. You did not mark it. You did not choose it. It is simply the place where the two arms happened to meet. And it arrives carrying three more measurements, none of which anybody asked for.

The angle at C came out at fifty-five degrees. A C came out at about six centimetres, and B C at about four point three. The third corner sits about four and a quarter centimetres above the base. Three in and three out, then. But this time the crossing was not guaranteed. Here is where the two constructions part company. With two sides and the angle between them, you lay both lengths off from one corner, one after the other.

Both far ends exist, so the segment joining them exists. Nothing in that can refuse. This construction is different, because the third corner is not something you place. It is something you wait for. Two arms go out from the two ends of the base, and either they meet or they do not. And sometimes they simply do not. So the real question is which pairs of angles work, and which pairs do not.

Start with the failures you can see at a glance. Draw a base, and set both arms leaning outwards, away from each other. Extend them as far as you like. They separate faster the further out you go. There is no crossing point out there, and there is never going to be one. Try again with one arm square to the base — a right angle — and the other leaning out.

The square one goes straight up. The other leans away from it. No meeting again. Now make both arms square to the base. Two right angles. Two lines square to the same base run alongside each other for ever. They are parallel, and parallel lines never meet. Those are obvious. The interesting question is where the boundary between them sits. So pin one angle down and move the other one.

Forty degrees at A, and it stays at forty for the rest of this. Start the arm at B at sixty degrees. The two arms cross low down, under three centimetres above the base. Open it to ninety, and the crossing climbs. A hundred and thirty, and the crossing is fourteen centimetres up — already off the paper. A hundred and thirty-nine point nine nine, and it is over a hundred metres above the base.

It is not settling anywhere. Every time you get ten times closer, it goes ten times further away. So push it all the way to a hundred and forty. And the crossing point does not go somewhere enormously far off. It stops existing. Look at the two arms at that moment. One leaves A at forty degrees. The other leaves B at a hundred and forty. They are pointing in exactly the same direction.

They are parallel. They run up the page side by side, and the gap between them never closes. That is not the last case that works. It is the first one that fails. Which is worth getting the right way round. At a hundred and forty there is no triangle, and above it there is no triangle either. Now where did a hundred and forty come from? You can read it straight off that picture, without measuring anything.

The two arms are parallel, and the base cuts across both of them. A line cutting across two others like that is called a transversal. The angle at A and the angle at B both sit inside the pair of parallel lines, and on the same side of the base. And two angles in that position always total a straight angle. A hundred and eighty degrees. So if the first is forty, the one at the boundary is a hundred and forty.

But do not let a hundred and forty become a magic number. It is the boundary for forty, and forty only. Which leaves one thing unexplained. What happened to the length? You were handed a five centimetre base. Surely a longer one gives the two arms more room to find each other. It does not. Watch. Here is a pair of angles that works, on a short base. The arms cross.

Stretch the base and they still cross — higher up, further apart, but they cross. Now a pair that fails, on that same short base. Stretch it and see. Stretching slides the two arms apart. What it does not do is tilt either of them. I ran every whole pair of angles on bases from half a centimetre to ten metres. Thirty-two thousand pairs, and not one of them changed its answer.

So the rule uses the two angles and nothing else, and it is a single comparison. Add them together. Under a hundred and eighty degrees, the arms meet and the triangle exists. A hundred and eighty or more, and they never meet at all. Try it. Thirty-five and a hundred and fifty make a hundred and eighty-five. No triangle. Seventy and thirty make a hundred, and that works. Fifty and a hundred and fifty make two hundred, and that does not.

Ninety and eighty-five make a hundred and seventy-five — and that one works, right angle and all. A right angle in the pair is not the problem. It takes two of them, or one angle big enough to make up the difference. And one last thing. Sixty and seventy on a five centimetre base, then on a seven: the base changes, the third angle stays at fifty. Two angles pin the shape down completely. What they leave open is the size.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

The book

Open in a new tab