PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 3, A Peek Beyond the Point
Chapter 3 · A Peek Beyond the Point
Locating a decimal on the number line, and comparing two decimals
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google10 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
Placing a decimal on the line and comparing two decimals are taught as separate skills. They are the same skill.
The idea
Finding a decimal on the number line and comparing two decimals are the same act seen from two sides. To place 4.185 the chapter zooms four times, each digit choosing one of the ten sub-intervals of the last (Part I, §3.6, p.71) — and that is precisely why comparison may stop at the first place where two numbers differ: once they have chosen different sub-intervals, everything still to come lies inside those, and no tail of digits can reach out of its own interval to overtake the other. The chapter asks the student to justify stopping (Part I, §3.6, p.73) and this is the justification.
What you should be able to do
- Locate a given decimal on a number line by successive splitting, and draw the chain of magnified lines that does it
- Work out what one division of an unfamiliar number line is worth before reading anything off it
- Decide whether two decimal numbers written with different numbers of digits are equal, and justify the decision from place value
- Distinguish a zero written after the last significant digit from a zero written between the point and a digit
- Compare two decimals by working leftmost place first, and stop at the first place where they differ
- Explain why stopping there is safe
- Given a target number and several candidates, decide which candidate is nearest and support it with a distance
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| number line | a straight line on which every number has a place | printed in Part I, §3.6, p.70 |
| magnified | blown up so that one stretch of a line fills the whole picture | printed in Part I, §3.6, p.71 |
| division | one gap between neighbouring marks on a line | printed in Part I, §3.6, p.71 |
| most significant digit | the digit sitting in the largest place a number uses | printed in Part I, §3.6, p.73, where the chapter also glosses it |
| place value | what a digit is worth because of where it sits | printed in Part I, §3.4, p.59 |
| ascending order | smallest first | printed in Part I, §3.6, p.73 |
| descending order | largest first | printed in Part I, §3.8, p.79 |
| thousandths | the parts of which a thousand fill a unit | printed in Part I, §3.4, p.61 |
| equivalent decimals | two decimal numbers that name one quantity | an added term, not printed in this chapter; the equality itself is demonstrated on p.70 with no name attached, and pp.70–73 were checked to check |
| trailing zero | a zero written after the last non-zero digit of the fractional part | an added term; not printed in this chapter, which speaks of putting zeros on the right |
Where people slip up
- "Every division on a number line is a tenth." Three printed lines in this section say otherwise — half units between 5 and 10, hundredths between 8 and 8.1, five hundredths between 4.3 and 4.8. Reading the endpoints and counting the gaps is the first step of every one of these items, and the chapter never does it for the student.
- "A decimal with more digits is bigger." Asked outright as an exercise at Part I, §3.8, p.79. A worked counter-case belongs in the explanation: 2.5 against 2.05.
- "Adding zeros on the right makes the number bigger." This is Zara's worry on p.70, and it is answered by the place value table rather than by assertion. Show the table.
- "So zeros never matter." The same table separates 0.2 from 0.02 and 0.002. A zero between the point and a digit pushes that digit into a smaller place; a zero after the last digit does not push anything.
- "Compare by counting the digits after the point." 3.81 against 13.800 kills this in one line.
- "You have to check every digit before deciding." The chapter's boxed prompt is exactly this question, and the answer is no. Whatever follows the deciding place is smaller than one unit of that place, so it cannot close a gap of at least one such unit.
- "Closest means fewest digits different." Nearness is a distance. The page measures it — one hundredth against ten hundredths.
- "04.50 is a different number from 4.5." The leading zero adds nothing; the trailing zero adds nothing. Both are in the seven-number list for that reason.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 3 Q3, Figure it Out · 3 Q4, Figure it Out · 3 Q5, Figure it Out · 3 Q6, Figure it Out · 3 Q15
Transcript1,435 words
Here is a number line, and a question that sounds too easy. Where exactly does one point four go? Somewhere between one and two. Everybody knows that much. So take the stretch between one and two and cut it into ten equal pieces. Now count along four of them and stop. That mark is one point four. And notice what the four just did. It did not measure anything. It counted.
Four pieces along, out of the ten this stretch was cut into. That is all a decimal digit ever is. An answer to the question, which piece? Hold on to that. Everything else in this video is that one move, done again. So do it again, one level further down. Look only at the first piece, the stretch from one to one point one. Blow it up until it fills the picture, and cut that into ten too.
Count along four of those, and you land on one point zero four. Same move, same count of four, completely different number. Because this time the four is choosing a piece of a piece. And that is what the zero in the middle is doing. Holding the tenths place open. One point four is four pieces of the first cut. One point zero four is four pieces of the second.
The zero is not decoration. It says which cut the four belongs to. Which sets up an argument worth having. Someone writes zero point two, then writes it again as zero point two zero. Then zero point two zero zero. The same number, they say. Someone else objects. Surely putting zeros on the end makes it bigger? There is a way to settle this that does not involve anybody raising their voice.
Put all three into a place value table and look at each column. Two in the tenths, and nothing anywhere else. Two in the tenths, and nothing anywhere else. And again. Row by row they are identical, so they are one number. The zeros on the right had nothing to push, because there was no digit to their right. But do not conclude from that that zeros never matter. Put one somewhere else and watch what happens.
Zero point zero two puts it between the point and the two, and shoves the two out of the tenths into the hundredths. One more, and zero point zero zero two shoves it into the thousandths, ten times smaller again. So a zero after the last digit changes nothing, and a zero in front of one changes everything. The difference is whether the zero has a digit to its right to push.
Here are seven numbers written with fours, fives and zeros in different arrangements. Sort them into families of equal numbers and you get exactly four families, not seven. Three are four point five, including one wearing a spare zero at each end, and neither zero does a thing. Now put it together and locate a number three places deep. Four point one eight five. Start with a line from zero to ten, cut into ten. The four picks four to five.
Magnify that until it fills the picture and cut it into ten. The one picks four point one to four point two. Magnify again, cut again, and the eight picks four point one eight to four point one nine. Magnify once more, and the five counts five marks along. There is the number. Four digits, four cuts, and every digit answered the same question. Which of these ten? Each level is a tenth as wide as the one above it.
So the number is not sitting somewhere vaguely near four point two. It is sealed inside a box one thousandth wide, and that box is what everything after this depends on. Before going on, a habit worth breaking. It catches nearly everybody. Not every division on a number line is a tenth. Here is a line running from five to ten, cut into ten pieces. Ten pieces, yes. But the stretch is five units long, so each piece is half a unit.
Count five along and you are standing on seven point five, not five point five. Here is another, from eight to eight point one, also cut into ten. Each piece is one hundredth. And a third, four point three to four point eight, cut into ten. Five hundredths each. Three lines, three different divisions, and not one of them says so anywhere. So read the ends, count the gaps, work out what one gap is worth, and only then read anything off it.
Now the second half of this, which turns out to be the first half again. Take two numbers that look nearly identical. Six point four five six, and six point four six five. Put them both on a line, and start zooming in. At the first level, both are in the stretch from six to seven. Together. Zoom in. At the next level both are between four tenths and five tenths. Still together.
Zoom again, and they finally part company. One falls into the piece beyond five hundredths, the other into the piece beyond six. From that moment they are in different boxes, and they never share a box again. The third digit is where they separated, and the third digit is where the answer is. You can do all of that without drawing anything, and it is the same procedure. Start at the biggest place and walk rightwards.
Six against six. The same. Move on. Four tenths against four tenths. The same. Move on. Five hundredths against six hundredths. Different, and there is your answer. Six point four six five is the larger, and the thousandths were never looked at. And here is the case that catches anyone comparing by counting digits instead. Three point eight one against thirteen point eight zero zero. The second is bigger, but not because it has more digits. It is bigger because thirteen beats three, settled in the whole part before a single digit after the point was read.
Which leaves the question you ought to be asking. Why is stopping safe? Once two numbers differ at some place, could the digits after it turn the answer around? No. And the number line has already shown you why not. At the place where they differed, the two went into different pieces, and those pieces do not overlap. Everything afterwards happens inside one piece or the other. And here is the fact that closes it. A tail is always narrower than the piece it sits in.
Fill it with nines. Give one of them nine thousandths, then nine ten thousandths, then nine more. That is still less than one whole hundredth, so it cannot climb out of its own piece. The gap opened at the deciding place can never be closed. That is why the first difference is the last thing you need. One more thing this buys you, not quite the same as comparing. Which of these is closest to one? Zero point nine, one point one, one point zero one, and one point one one.
Closest is not about how many digits differ. It is a distance, and distances get measured. Zero point nine sits one tenth below one. Ten hundredths away. One point one sits one tenth above. Also ten hundredths, on the other side. So those two are exactly the same distance from one, which no digit counting would ever tell you. One point one one is eleven hundredths away, the worst of the four.
And one point zero one is one hundredth away. One hundredth against ten hundredths is not a close race. Measure, and the question answers itself. To finish, a puzzle whose answer lands exactly where this video has been pointing. You have five digits. Four, one, eight, two and five, each used once. Put two before the point and three after, and get as close to twenty five as you can.
There is an obvious candidate coming down from above. Twenty five point one four eight. That is one hundred and forty eight thousandths over. And one climbing up from below. Twenty four point eight five one. That is one hundred and forty nine thousandths short. One hundred and forty eight against one hundred and forty nine. Decided at the third place after the point, by a single thousandth. Which is this whole video in one answer. Compare from the left, stop at the first place that differs, and trust it, because by then the two are already in boxes that will never touch again.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- Extending Indian place value to the right of the pointClass 7 · Ch 3, A Peek Beyond the Point
- A hundredth part, and continuing the splitClass 7 · Ch 3, A Peek Beyond the Point
Either side of this one
- Why measurement units are built in tensClass 7 · Ch 3, A Peek Beyond the Point
- Adding and subtracting decimals by aligning place valueClass 7 · Ch 3, A Peek Beyond the Point