PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 9, SymmetryPrepShorts

Chapter 9 · Symmetry

Symmetry as reflection: the fold line acts as a mirror

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Lines of symmetry9 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

9 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

Folding paper is where it starts. Reflecting points is what lets you talk about figures too big to fold.

The idea

Folding is something you do to paper; reflecting is something you can do to a single point. The chapter's move from one to the other is not a change of wording — it is what makes symmetry usable, because once each corner is known to cross the line to a named partner, the labels of a square tell you in advance which corner will end up where, and you can finish half a drawing on squared paper without owning any paper at all.

What you should be able to do

  • Restate the fold test as a statement about where each point goes
  • Given a square labelled A, B, C, D and a stated line of symmetry, say which corner lands on which
  • Identify the points of a figure that a given reflection leaves where they are
  • Predict the effect of reflecting a labelled square along a diagonal and along each mid-line
  • Use the term reflection symmetry for a figure that has at least one line of symmetry
  • Complete a half-drawn figure on squared paper so that a given line becomes a line of symmetry
  • Complete a figure so that two given lines are both lines of symmetry

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
reflectionthe operation that sends every point of a figure across the line to its partner§9.1, p.221 — printed as the sub-heading and used through the passage
reflection symmetrythe property of a figure that has one or more lines of symmetry§9.1, p.222 — printed in bold there
line of symmetrythe line the reflection happens across§9.1, p.219 — printed in bold and defined there
mirror halvesthe two parts the line of symmetry cuts the figure into§9.1, p.219 — printed in bold there
cornera point where two sides of the figure meet, here labelled with a capital letter§9.1, p.221 — the square's corners are labelled there
diagonalthe line joining two opposite corners of the square§9.1, pp.221–222 — the diagonal fold and the diagonal reflection
squared paperruled grid paper used to complete a half-figure by counting squares§9.1, p.228, Q11 — the instruction is printed there
imagethe point a reflection sends a given point tonot printed in this chapter — the explanation's word; the book instead says a point takes up the place another point held
perpendicularat right angles — the direction in which a point travels to reach its partnernot printed in this chapter — the explanation's construction; the book reflects by folding, never by measuring across

Where people slip up

  • "Reflection turns the figure round." It does not. Each point crosses the line straight over; nothing rotates. Turning is the subject of module m02 and keeping the two apart at this stage is the whole point of section 1.
  • "The image of a point is somewhere near the mirror." It is a specific place: straight across the line, and just as far from it. Section 9 exists to fix that, because the squared-paper exercises are unusable without it.
  • "Every corner moves." A reflection along a diagonal leaves the two corners on that diagonal exactly where they are. Fixed points are not a failure of the reflection; they are part of it.
  • "Reflecting twice gets you somewhere new." Reflecting across the same line twice returns every point to where it started. Worth one beat, because it is what makes the two mirror halves genuinely interchangeable.
  • "Completing a figure means copying it beside itself." On squared paper the copy is flipped, not slid. Counting squares away from the line, in the same row, is the reliable method.
  • "With two mirror lines you draw one extra piece." Q12 needs three: the reflection in each line, and then the reflection of one of those in the other.
Transcript1,414 words

Fold the paper along the line, and see whether the two parts land on each other. That is the test, and it works. But it needs paper. And most of the time you do not have any. So here is the same idea said a different way. Instead of folding the whole figure at once, take one point of it and send that point across the line, on its own.

Then do the same to the next point. And the next. If every point lands on a point of the figure, the line is a line of symmetry. Nothing has changed except what you are watching. And what you get in return is that each point now has a partner with a name. To see why a name matters, put letters on a square. A at the top left. B at the top right. C at the bottom right. D at the bottom left.

Going round, that is A, B, C, D, clockwise. Now the square has four lines of symmetry, and we know that from the last video. The upright one down the middle, the flat one across, and the two that run corner to corner. Take them one at a time and ask a sharper question than before. Not does it work. Where does each corner go? Start with the upright line, straight down the middle.

Watch A. It is at the top left, and it crosses over to the top right. And what is already at the top right? B. So A takes the place B was in. Now B. It crosses the other way and takes the place A was in. D, at the bottom left, goes to the bottom right, which is where C was. And C comes back the other way to where D was.

Four corners, all four moved, and each one landed exactly where another corner had been. Write down what just happened, because the way it is written is the point. A with B. D with C. Two pairs. Nothing on its own, nothing left over. That is not a coincidence of this square. If a corner had landed somewhere that was not a corner, the line would have failed the test.

And notice something about the letters themselves. Before the fold, reading round the square gave A, B, C, D. After it, reading round the same way gives B, A, D, C. The same four letters, read backwards. That is what crossing a line does, and it is worth holding on to, because turning the square would not do it. Now a question that sounds like a trick and is not.

What happens to a point that is sitting on the line itself? It goes straight across the line. It travels nothing at all. It stays exactly where it is. And that is not the reflection failing. It is the reflection working. The line is made entirely of points that are their own partner. Everything else moves. Take any point that is not on the line, however close, and it lands somewhere new.

One more thing worth knowing. Reflect a point across a line, then reflect it back across the same line, and it returns to precisely where it started. Which is why the two halves are interchangeable. Neither one is the original. Now the diagonal, the one running from A down to C. A is on the line. So A does not move. C is on the line too. C does not move either.

That leaves B and D, and they are the interesting ones. B is at the top right. Send it straight across the diagonal and it arrives at the bottom left, which is D. And D crosses the other way to B. So this fold holds two corners perfectly still and swaps the other two. Which is a different answer from the upright fold, on the same square, and both are correct.

One more, to finish the set. The flat line, straight across the middle. A is at the top left and goes down to the bottom left, where D was. B goes down to C, and the two at the bottom come up to meet them. A with D. B with C. No corner stays put. And there is the fourth line, the other diagonal, which holds B and D still and swaps A with C.

Put all four side by side and a pattern falls out. Every one of them holds two corners still, or holds none. Never one. Never three. There is a name for what a figure has when at least one line does this. Reflection symmetry. A square has it. So does a rectangle, with two lines rather than four. A triangle with three sides all different does not have it at all, and that is a complete answer, not a missing one.

The word reflection is doing real work in that name. It says the two halves are related by crossing the line, not by sliding along it and not by turning round. Turning is a different thing entirely, and it is worth keeping the two apart. A quarter turn of our square sends A to D. The upright fold sends A to B. Both leave the square looking untouched. They are still not the same move.

Now the part that makes all of this useful. Here is a line, and here is a point, and no paper anywhere. Where exactly is the partner? Three things pin it down, and between them they leave only one place it can be. First, it is straight across. Leave the point travelling at right angles to the line, not at any other angle. Second, it is equally far. However far the point sits from the line, the partner sits the same distance on the other side.

Third, and this is the same fact said again, the line cuts the journey exactly in half. Straight across, equally far, half way. That is a construction you can carry out with a ruler, or by counting, and it never needs a fold. Which is exactly what squared paper is for. Here is half a shape drawn on a grid, and a line beside it. The job is to finish the shape so that the line becomes a line of symmetry.

Take one corner of the drawing. Count the squares from it across to the line. Three. Now count three squares out on the other side, staying in the same row. Mark it. That is the partner. The next corner is two squares from the line. So its partner is two squares out on the other side, again in its own row. Do that for every corner and join them up, and the shape is finished.

One warning. The copy is turned over, not slid along. If you slide it, you get a shape with no line of symmetry at all, and it will look almost right. Now the version that catches nearly everybody. Two lines this time, an upright one and a flat one, and a small piece of shape in one of the four regions. Both lines have to end up as lines of symmetry.

So reflect the piece across the upright line. That is one copy. Reflect the original across the flat line. That is two. And you are not finished, because the figure you have now is not symmetric about either line. There is a third copy, diagonally opposite the original, and it is the reflection of a reflection. One piece, three more. Four in all. And with the two lines at half a right angle instead, one piece becomes eight.

Last thing, and it goes back to where we started. Counting lines of symmetry looked like a matter of trying folds until you ran out. The reflection picture says what you were actually counting. A line is a line of symmetry exactly when sending every corner across it lands every corner on a corner. That is why the square gets four and the rectangle gets two. The rectangle's diagonal sends a corner to a place where there is no corner, and you can see where it lands.

And it is why the count never depends on how the figure was drawn or which way up it sits. Fold the paper if you have paper. Send the points across if you do not. It is one fact, and now you have two ways to get at it.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

The book

Open in a new tab