PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 5, Prime TimePrepShorts

Chapter 5 · Prime Time

Common factors: which jump sizes can land on a number

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Multiples and factors held in common10 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

10 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

Which jump lengths land exactly on 24 — and why do 14 and 36 share almost nothing?

The idea

"Which hop lengths land exactly on 24?" and "what are the factors of 24?" are the same question asked twice, and the hopping version is the one you can see. Put two treasures down and the question becomes the factors the two numbers hold in common — and the picture immediately explains something the definitions do not: why a pair's common factors always form a short finite list that starts at 1, while its common multiples form an endless one. A factor cannot be bigger than the number it divides; a multiple has nowhere to stop.

What you should be able to do

  • List every factor of a number under 100 systematically, in pairs
  • State that a jump size lands on a number exactly when it is a factor of it
  • Use both of the book's words, factor and divisor, for the same idea
  • Find the common factors of a pair by intersecting the two factor lists
  • Explain why 1 is a common factor of every pair, and why no common factor can exceed the smaller number
  • Contrast the finite list of common factors with the endless list of common multiples, and say why the difference is forced
  • Read a shaded-and-circled number grid as two multiple-lists laid over each other
  • Work backwards from clues about factors and digits to identify a number

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
factora number that divides another exactly, with nothing left overprinted in §5.1, p.109 and defined in the Summary, p.128
divisorthe book's alternative word for factor, printed alongside itprinted in §5.1, p.109
common factora number that divides both of two given numbersprinted in §5.1, p.110
multiplea number reached by counting in equal steps of a fixed sizeprinted in §5.1, p.107
common multiplea number that both of two given step sizes land onprinted in §5.1, p.107
perfect numbera number whose factors add up to twice the numberprinted and defined in §5.1, p.111
factor paira pair that multiplies together to give the numberan added term; not printed in this chapter
highest common factorthe largest number dividing both of a pairprinted in Chapter 7 on fractions, not in this chapter

Where people slip up

  • "1 and the number itself do not really count as factors." The book has to add them back explicitly on p.109 because they are the two everyone drops. Every factor list starts at 1 and ends at the number, always.
  • "Common factors of a big pair should be a long list." Size has nothing to do with it. 14 and 36 are not small, and they share exactly two factors. What controls the length is what the pair holds in common, not how large it is.
  • "Common factors and common multiples behave the same way." They do not, and this is the topic's second argument. Factors of a number are trapped between 1 and the number, so any pair has finitely many common factors and always at least one. Multiples run off to the right for ever.
  • "A hop of 7 reaches 36 because 36 is bigger than 7." Landing is about dividing exactly, not about getting far enough. Walk the arcs past 36 and let the miss be visible.
  • "Shaded means 'multiple of the smaller number' automatically." The grid on p.110 is deliberately unlabelled. The class has to find which rhythm is shaded and which is ringed; handing them the answer removes the whole task.
  • "A perfect number is one that looks neat." It is defined by a computation, and the definition is printed inside the question. Add the factors, compare with twice the number, and there is no aesthetic judgement anywhere in it.
Transcript1,323 words

Here's a game about jumping. I hide a treasure on a number. You pick how long your jump is, and then you're stuck with it. You start at zero, and you can only land where your jump takes you. Say the treasure is on 24, and you choose to jump in fours. Four, eight, twelve, sixteen, twenty, twenty-four. You land right on it. You win. But here's the real question, and I want you to guess before we go on.

How many different jump lengths win this treasure? Most people picture a long list. Hold on to your number, and let's find out. Let's watch that winning jump properly. From zero, every hop of four is exactly the same size. The arcs march along the line. Four, eight, twelve, sixteen, twenty, and the last arc drops onto 24. The jump worked for one reason only. Twenty-four divided by four is six, with nothing left over.

Six perfect jumps, no remainder. That's what landing really means. So which other jump lengths land on 24? Jump in twos, and you land on every even number, so of course you hit 24. Jump in threes. Three, six, nine, and on it goes, straight onto 24. Jump in sixes. Six, twelve, eighteen, twenty-four. Four big jumps. Jump in eights. Eight, sixteen, twenty-four. Three jumps. Jump in twelves, and you're there in two.

But try a jump of five. Five, ten, fifteen, twenty, twenty-five. It steps clean over the treasure. And a jump of seven misses too. Twenty-one, then twenty-eight. It jumps right past. Now, two jump lengths almost everybody forgets. A jump of one. It's slow, but it walks over every single number, so it certainly lands on 24. And a jump of 24 itself. One enormous leap, straight from zero to the treasure.

Both of those win. They feel like cheating, but the rule never said the jump had to be interesting. So our full winning list is one, two, three, four, six, eight, twelve, and twenty-four. Eight winners. Did your guess come close? That list has a name you already know. Each of those numbers is a factor of 24. Your book also calls them divisors. Two words, one idea. And here's a way to be sure you've never missed one. Build them in pairs.

One times twenty-four. Two times twelve. Three times eight. Four times six. Four pairs, eight factors, and the pairs close in from both ends until they meet in the middle. Do it this way and a factor cannot hide from you. Now let's make the game harder. Two treasures at once. One sits on 14, the other on 36. You still only get one jump length. Try jumping in sevens. Seven, fourteen. Straight onto the first treasure.

Keep going. Twenty-one, twenty-eight, thirty-five, forty-two. Watch carefully around 36. Thirty-five, then forty-two. It stepped right over. Now, 36 is much bigger than seven, so the jump certainly travels far enough. But landing was never about travelling far enough. It's about dividing exactly. Thirty-six divided by seven is five, remainder one. That leftover one is the whole story. So which jump lengths collect both treasures? The factors of 14 are one, two, seven, and fourteen.

The factors of 36 are one, two, three, four, six, nine, twelve, eighteen, and thirty-six. Lay the two lists on top of each other and look at the overlap. Only one and two sit in both. Those are the common factors. That's it. Between them the two treasures offer eleven different factors, and only two of them work for both. Try the same thing with 15 and 30. The factors of 15 are one, three, five, and fifteen. Every single one of them also divides thirty.

So here the overlap is the whole of the smaller list. One, three, five, and fifteen. Two pairs, two completely different answers. Now hold on. Fourteen and thirty-six aren't small numbers, and they share almost nothing. So does a bigger pair give you a longer list of common factors? No. Size has nothing to do with it. But two things are always true, and they're worth knowing. First, one is a factor of absolutely every number, so every pair shares at least one.

The overlap is never empty. Second, a factor can never be bigger than the number it divides. So the common factors of a pair are trapped between one and the smaller number. The list always ends. Here's the same idea hiding in a grid, and this one is yours to crack. The numbers 31 to 70, ten to a row. Some cells are shaded, some are ringed. The shaded ones are 33, 36, 39, 42, and on in that rhythm.

The ringed ones are 32, 36, 40, 44, and on in a different rhythm. Pause and work out what each rhythm is counting in, before I tell you. The shaded cells are the multiples of 3. The ringed cells are the multiples of 4. And three cells carry both marks. Thirty-six, forty-eight, and sixty. Those are the common multiples of 3 and 4, and they're exactly the multiples of twelve.

Now put the two games side by side, because they behave completely differently. Common multiples of 3 and 4 start at twelve and keep going. Twenty-four, thirty-six, forty-eight, for ever. That list runs off the edge of the screen and never stops. Common factors of a pair sit in a short list that starts at one and stops at the smaller number. It's not a coincidence. It's forced. A multiple has nowhere it has to stop. A factor is fenced in by the number it divides.

Endless one way, finite the other. Let's run the machine backwards and hunt numbers from clues. Find a number under 40 that has 7 as a factor, and whose digits add up to eight. The multiples of seven under forty are seven, fourteen, twenty-one, twenty-eight, thirty-five. Check the digit sums. Only thirty-five gives three plus five, which is eight. That's the number. Try another. Under 100, with both 3 and 5 as factors, and two digits that differ by one.

Having both three and five means it's a multiple of fifteen. Fifteen, thirty, forty-five, sixty, seventy-five, ninety. Which has digits differing by one? Forty-five. Four and five. Now a few quick ones. The common factors of 20 and 28 are one, two, and four. For 35 and 50, just one and five. You can do it for three numbers at once too. Four, eight and twelve all share one, two, and four.

Five, fifteen and twenty-five share one and five. Which jump lengths reach both 28 and 70? Their common factors. One, two, seven, and fourteen. And which multiples of 40 sit between 310 and 410? Three hundred and twenty, three hundred and sixty, four hundred. One more that catches people out. Name three multiples of 25 that are not multiples of 50. Twenty-five, seventy-five, and a hundred and twenty-five. The odd ones in the twenty-five rhythm.

One last idea, and it's a strange one. Take 28 and list its factors. One, two, four, seven, fourteen, twenty-eight. Add them all up. That comes to fifty-six, which is exactly twice twenty-eight. A number whose factors add to twice itself is called a perfect number. There's one hiding between 1 and 10. Its factors are one, two, three, and six, and they add to twelve. Twelve is twice six. So six is perfect.

And that's the heart of both these videos. A jump lands when it divides exactly. Multiples are where you can get to. Factors are what you're built from. Here's the open question. Perfect numbers are extremely rare. Six, then twenty-eight, then four hundred and ninety-six. Nobody has ever found an odd one, and nobody has proved that none exists. That question has been open for over two thousand years. Tell me in the comments if you can find the one after 496.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

The book

Open in a new tab