PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 1, Patterns in Mathematics
Chapter 1 · Patterns in Mathematics
Counting the parts of a shape sequence produces a number sequence
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google11 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
Stacked squares and stacked triangles both give 1, 4, 9, 16, 25 — for reasons that have nothing to do with each other. Which is why the count is never the explanation.
The idea
A shape sequence does not arrive with a number sequence attached — you get one by choosing something to count, and the choice is yours to make. Two choices can collapse onto one answer, as sides and corners do; two different sequences can land on the same row of Table 1 for completely different reasons, as the stacked squares and the stacked triangles do. So the number is never the explanation. The explanation is always in how the shape was built.
What you should be able to do
- Choose a countable feature of a shape sequence and produce the resulting number sequence
- Count the sides of the regular polygons and identify the row of Table 1 the counts belong to
- Explain why counting corners instead of sides changes nothing
- Count the lines in each complete graph and justify the triangular numbers from the construction
- Count the little squares in a stacked square and give the reason
- Count the little triangles in a stacked triangle, including the inverted ones, and give the reason
- State that the two stacks yield the same number sequence and give the two different reasons
- Produce the Koch segment counts and describe them as repeated multiplication by 4
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| side | one straight edge of a closed figure | printed in §1.6, p.11 |
| corner | the point where two sides of a figure meet | printed in §1.6, p.11 |
| vertices | the other name for those corners | printed in the solutions appendix bound with this chapter, page footered [5] |
| closed figure | a figure whose boundary returns to where it started | printed in the solutions appendix bound with this chapter, page footered [5] |
| regular | sides all of one length, corners all alike | printed in §1.6, p.11 |
| complete graph | dots with a line drawn between every pair of them | printed as a Table 3 label, p.10 |
| stacked squares | a square block ruled into little squares | printed as a Table 3 label, p.10 |
| stacked triangles | a triangle ruled into little triangles | printed as a Table 3 label, p.10 |
| triangular numbers | 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, … | printed in Table 1, p.3 |
| square numbers | 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, … | printed in the §1.3 Figure it Out, p.5 |
| powers of 4 | repeated multiplication by 4 — the book names this row but does not list its values | printed in §1.6, p.12 |
| Koch snowflake | the shape sequence built by replacing every straight piece with a bump | printed as a Table 3 label, p.10 |
Where people slip up
- "Each shape sequence has a number sequence." It has as many as there are things worth counting. On the regular polygons alone you can count sides, corners, or diagonals, and only the first two agree.
- "Sides equal corners because both happen to be 3, 4, 5, 6." It is not a numerical coincidence. Walking round any closed figure, every side ends at a corner and every corner starts a side, so they pair off. That argument works for figures that are not in Table 3 at all.
- "K6 has 6 lines." It has 15. The count is over pairs of dots, not over dots, and the drawing on p.10 shows all fifteen.
- "A stacked triangle with 4 rows has 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 little triangles." That counts only the upright ones and gives 10. Including the inverted ones gives 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16. This is the single most common error in §1.6 and the book's printed hint exists because of it.
- "The two stacks give the same sequence, so they are really the same problem." They are not. Two different constructions can meet at the same numbers; noticing that they do is interesting precisely because the reasons are unrelated.
- "Every sequence you find must be in Table 1." The Koch counts are not, and §1.6 says so on the page. Table 1 was a sample, never a catalogue.
- "The Koch count doubles." It is multiplied by 4 each round, because one straight piece becomes four.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 1.6 Q1, Figure it Out · 1.6 Q2, Figure it Out · 1.6 Q3, Figure it Out · 1.6 Q4, Figure it Out · 1.6 Q5
Transcript1,505 words
Here are the five shape sequences from last time. Polygons. Complete graphs. Stacked squares. Stacked triangles. And the snowflake. Not a single number anywhere. Just shapes, and the rules that build them. So where do the numbers come from? They come from you. From a decision you make. You pick something on the shape that you can count. And the moment you do, a number sequence appears. Which means a shape sequence doesn't have one number sequence. It has as many as there are things worth counting.
And by the end of this video, two of these are going to land on exactly the same numbers, for reasons that have nothing to do with each other. That's the thing I really want you to see. So let's start counting. Your book's own example is the polygons, and it picks the obvious thing. Count the sides. The triangle. One, two, three. Three sides. The square. Four. The pentagon. Five. The hexagon, six. The heptagon, seven. The octagon, eight.
The nonagon, nine. The decagon, ten. Three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten. That's a row of table one. It's the counting numbers — just started at three instead of one. Which makes sense. You can't close a shape with two straight sides. Three is where polygons start. Now something you might have half-noticed already. The names aren't decoration. Each one is telling you the count. Pentagon. Penta means five. Hexagon, six. Heptagon, seven. Octagon, eight.
You already know that last one from somewhere else. An octopus has eight arms. Same word. Nonagon is nine, decagon is ten. And a decade is ten years. So the names were never arbitrary labels you had to memorise. They were the counts all along. Which is a small thing, but it's the sort of small thing that makes a subject stop feeling like a list of words. One quick note about that word regular, because your book is careful about it and I'd like to be too.
Regular means two things. All the sides are the same length. And all the corners are alike. The first half you can check with a ruler. The second half — all corners alike — needs a way of measuring corners, and we haven't got one yet. Your book says so, quite openly. It says angles are taken further in the chapter that follows this one. So think of it as a promise. Half the definition is cashed in now. The other half arrives in chapter two.
I'd rather tell you that than pretend the word is fully defined when it isn't. Back to counting. Now let's count something else on exactly the same shapes. The corners. Triangle. One, two, three corners. Square, four corners. Pentagon, five. Hexagon, six. And on it goes. Seven, eight, nine, ten. Three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten. The same numbers. We changed what we were counting, and nothing moved.
Now, is that a coincidence? It really isn't, and the reason is worth a minute. Take any closed shape made of straight sides. Any at all. It doesn't have to be regular. It doesn't have to be in our table. Now walk round the edge of it. Start at a corner, and go. You walk along a side, and you arrive at a corner. Along the next side, and you arrive at the next corner.
Every side you walk ends at exactly one corner. And every corner you reach was the end of exactly one side. So the sides and the corners pair off. One each. Nothing left over on either team. That's why the counts are equal, and notice what the argument did. It never mentioned three, or four, or ten. It works for any closed figure at all, including squashed and lopsided ones we've never drawn.
That's a reason, not an observation. And we got it by walking round a shape. Right. Different row. The complete graphs, and this time we count the lines. K two. Two dots, one line. That's one. K three. Three dots, and every pair joined. Count them. Three. K four. Four dots. Now we've got the four sides of the square, plus both diagonals. Six. K five. Take your time with this one. It's ten.
K six. Fifteen. One, three, six, ten, fifteen. And those are old friends. The triangular numbers. Now why would joining dots up produce the triangular numbers? Let's watch it happen. Here's K five, with its ten lines. I'm going to add a sixth dot. The new dot has to join to every dot already there. There are five of them. So that's five new lines. Ten plus five is fifteen. And that's K six.
Now run the same argument backwards. Going from K four to K five added four new lines. K three to K four added three. K two to K three added two. So the jumps are two, then three, then four, then five. Each jump is one bigger than the last, and that is exactly how the triangular numbers grow. So it isn't a coincidence that these are triangular numbers. It's the same reason as the triangles.
Adding a dot means adding a longer row of lines each time — just like adding a longer row of dots to a triangle. Next. The stacked squares, and we count the little squares inside each one. One. Then four. Then nine. Then sixteen. Then twenty-five. The square numbers, and the reason is right there in the picture. The fourth block is four rows, with four little squares in each row.
Four rows of four is sixteen. That's not a discovery, that's just what a rectangle is. So: stacked squares give the squares, because the block is n rows of n. Easy, and completely solid. Hold on to that reason, because we're about to get the same numbers a completely different way. The stacked triangles. And now we count the little triangles. Carefully — including the ones pointing downwards, which is the trap we found last time.
One. Four. Nine. Sixteen. Twenty-five. Which are the square numbers again. From a row of triangles. And you might think, fine, same reason as before. It isn't. Look at what the rows actually hold. Take the four-row stack. Top row: one little triangle. Second row: three. Two pointing up and one pointing down. Third row: five. Three up and two down. Fourth row: seven. Four up and three down. One, three, five, seven. Those are the odd numbers.
And add them up: one plus three is four, plus five is nine, plus seven is sixteen. Which is a fact we proved two videos ago, with a completely different picture. Running totals of the odd numbers are the squares. So the answer is sixteen — but it got here by a totally different road. Put those side by side, because this is the most important minute in the video.
Stacked squares: one, four, nine, sixteen, twenty-five. Stacked triangles: one, four, nine, sixteen, twenty-five. Identical. Every single value. But the reasons have nothing to do with each other. One of them is: a block is n rows of n. That's a rectangle argument. The other is: the rows hold one, three, five, seven, and odd numbers add to squares. That's a completely different argument, with a completely different picture. Same landing place. Different roads. And here's the point.
If somebody hands you the numbers one, four, nine, sixteen, and asks you why — you cannot answer. The numbers don't know why. The numbers came out of a shape, and the reason stayed behind in the shape. That's the lesson of this whole chapter, sitting in one example. The count is never the explanation. One row left. The snowflake, and we count the straight pieces. The first shape is a triangle. Three straight pieces.
Then every piece gets replaced by four. So three becomes twelve. Twelve becomes forty-eight. Forty-eight becomes a hundred and ninety-two. And that becomes seven hundred and sixty-eight. Three, twelve, forty-eight. Now be careful — it's tempting to say this doubles. It doesn't. It's multiplied by four every time, because one piece becomes four. Your book describes it as three, multiplied by four over and over. And then it says something I want you to notice. This row is not in table one.
Table one had powers of two and powers of three. It never had this. Which tells you what table one always was. A sample. Ten sequences the book picked to get you started. Never a complete catalogue. You can build a shape sequence tomorrow that lands on numbers nobody has tabulated, and you'd still be doing mathematics. So here's your question. Take the stacked triangles, and count only the ones pointing downwards. Nought, one, three, six.
What sequence is that, and can you say why? Put it in the comments. That's the end of chapter one. Patterns, reasons, sequences and shapes. Next time we start chapter two, and we finally get to measure a corner.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- Shapes come in sequences too, with rules of their ownClass 6 · Ch 1, Patterns in Mathematics
- Why adding the odd numbers gives the squaresClass 6 · Ch 1, Patterns in Mathematics
- Every number sequence is a rule, not a listClass 6 · Ch 1, Patterns in Mathematics
Comes up again in
- Rearranging a sum so it can be done in your headClass 6 · Ch 3, Number Play
- A fraction as a part of one wholeClass 6 · Ch 7, Fractions
Either side of this one
- A point fixes a location; a segment is the shortest route between two pointsClass 6 · Ch 2, Lines and Angles