PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 3, Number PlayPrepShorts

Chapter 3 · Number Play

Rearranging a sum so it can be done in your head

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Calculating cleverly10 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

10 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

Out of every whole thousand there is, exactly one cannot be built from the book's five numbers — 1,000. And the bullseye's beautiful halve-and-double pattern turns out to be false: that outer ring holds eighteen discs, not sixteen.

The idea

An addition is not a fixed amount of work. The work depends entirely on how you group it, and you are allowed to regroup because addition does not care about the order or the bracketing. That single permission is what both these sections spend: §3.8 hands you a target and a small set of parts and asks which grouping reaches it, and §3.9 hands you the same sum already arranged in a picture whose shape tells you which grouping to use. Mental arithmetic here is not faster arithmetic — it is less arithmetic, bought by choosing the decomposition before you start.

What you should be able to do

  • Reach a stated total by combining given numbers, reusing them as needed
  • Show more than one combination that reaches the same total
  • Decide whether a stated total can be reached at all, and justify the decision
  • Use subtraction as well as addition to reach a target more cheaply
  • Explain why adding then taking away can beat adding four times
  • Produce examples for stated digit-count scenarios, and identify which scenarios are impossible
  • Classify a statement about digit counts as always, sometimes or never true, with a reason
  • Find the total of a patterned arrangement by grouping rather than by counting one at a time
  • Read a diagram's shape as an instruction about how to group
  • Build an arrangement of your own that adds up to a chosen total

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
Mental Maththe book's own name for arithmetic done by regrouping rather than on paper§3.8, p.65 — printed there as the section title
middle columnthe set of numbers available to be combined, in the opening figure§3.8, p.65 — printed there
Adding and Subtractingthe book's label for the version where both operations are allowed§3.8, p.66 — printed there as a bold sub-heading
Digits and Operationsthe book's label for the digit-count exercises§3.8, p.66 — printed there as a bold sub-heading
Always, Sometimes, Neverthe book's label for the classify-the-statement exercise§3.8, p.67 — printed there as an italic heading
sumthe result of adding§3.8, p.65 — printed there
differencethe result of subtracting§3.8, p.66 — printed there
quicker waythe book's own phrase for the point of §3.9§3.9, p.67 — printed there, in the opening question
groupingthe explanation's name for a choice of which parts to add together firstan added term, not printed anywhere in the book
repeated partthe explanation's name for a value that appears many times in one arrangementan added term, not printed anywhere in the book

Where people slip up

  • "Mental maths means doing the same sum faster in your head." It means doing a different, shorter sum that has the same answer. 38,800 by column addition and 38,800 as 25,000 + 400 + 400 + 13,000 are not the same amount of work.
  • "There is one right way to make a target." 28,000 and 63,000 can each be made more than one way. The figure invites several routes and the class should compare them rather than converge on a single answer.
  • "If you can make 2,000 you can make 1,000." You cannot. The two smallest parts are 400 and 1,500, and no number of 400s lands on 1,000. This is the first impossibility argument in the section and it is short enough to do fully.
  • "Subtraction is a step backwards, so it cannot make things quicker." 39,800 is reached fastest by overshooting to 40,000 and coming back. Overshoot-and-correct is the whole reason the second toolbox exists.
  • "Adding two 4-digit numbers can give a 6-digit number." It cannot, and the Always, Sometimes, Never block is built to expose exactly this. Two 4-digit numbers are each under 10,000, so the sum is under 20,000. Give the argument, not a failed search.
  • "To total a picture you count everything in it." That is what §3.9 exists to refuse. The arrangement is the hint; the rows of figure (a) and the two blocks of figure (c) are placed as they are on purpose.
  • "The dotted grids are decoration." They are sums too — of dots. They are the hardest of the six because you must decide what the repeated part is before you can count anything.
Transcript1,369 words

Here is a figure from your book. It looks like a puzzle, but it is really a permission slip. Down the middle, five numbers. Twenty-five thousand. Four hundred. Thirteen thousand. Fifteen hundred. Sixty thousand. Down the left and the right, eight targets. And arrows running from the middle out to each one. Your job is to hit each target by adding numbers from the middle column. And you may use any of them as often as you like.

That last rule is the whole game. The middle column is not five numbers. It is five numbers, repeatable, which is a far bigger toolbox than it looks. Your book works two of them for you. Start with thirty-eight thousand eight hundred. Twenty-five thousand. Plus four hundred. Plus four hundred again. Plus thirteen thousand. Twenty-five and thirteen thousand is thirty-eight thousand. Two four hundreds is eight hundred. Thirty-eight thousand eight hundred.

And notice what did not happen. Nobody wrote out a column and carried anything. The second one is three thousand four hundred. Fifteen hundred, plus fifteen hundred, plus four hundred. Three thousand, and four hundred. Done. Which is the point of this whole section, and it is worth saying plainly. Mental arithmetic is not the same sum done faster. It is a shorter sum with the same answer. Now try twenty-eight thousand yourself. And then keep going, because there is more than one road.

Twenty-five thousand, plus fifteen hundred, plus fifteen hundred. Three parts. Or thirteen thousand, plus thirteen thousand, plus five four hundreds. Seven parts. Same destination. More than twice the work. Sixty-three thousand tells the same story. Sixty thousand plus two fifteen hundreds is three parts. Or twenty-five thousand, plus twenty-five thousand, plus thirteen thousand. Also three. So when your book asks you to find a way, the honest follow-up is: is that the cheapest way? Usually it is not.

Then your book asks a much better question. Can you make one thousand? Have a go. You will not manage it, and here is the reason. Every part except four hundred is already bigger than a thousand. So the only tool you have is four hundred. Four hundred. Eight hundred. Twelve hundred. It steps straight over one thousand and never lands on it. So one thousand is out of reach. And then the book asks which whole thousands are impossible.

The answer is lovely. Just that one. Two thousand you can make: five four hundreds. Three thousand you can make: two fifteen hundreds. And once you can make two and three, you can make everything above them. Four is two and two. Five is two and three. Six is three and three. And so on, for ever. So out of every whole thousand there is, exactly one is unreachable. One thousand.

Second half of the section, and your book hands you a new toolbox with a new rule. Six numbers this time. Forty thousand. Seven thousand. Three hundred. Fifteen hundred. Twelve thousand. Eight hundred. And now you are allowed to subtract as well as add. That sounds like a small change. It is not. Because until now every move took you closer from below, and you had to land exactly. Now you can go past the target and come back. Which means the numbers near your target become useful even when they are too big.

Here is the book's example, and it is the best argument for the new rule. The target is thirty-nine thousand eight hundred. By adding only, you would have to build that out of twelve thousands and seven thousands and fifteen hundreds. Several goes. With subtraction, you start at forty thousand. Take away eight hundred. Thirty-nine thousand two hundred. Add three hundred. Add three hundred again. Thirty-nine thousand eight hundred. Four moves, and the first one carried you almost the whole way.

Try forty-five thousand the same way. Forty thousand, plus twelve thousand, minus seven thousand. Three moves. Overshoot and correct. Once you have seen it, you use it everywhere. Next, the book changes the question. Instead of hitting a target, it asks about the shape of the answer. It prints two sums. Twelve thousand three hundred and fifty, plus twenty-four thousand five hundred and forty-five, is thirty-six thousand eight hundred and ninety-five.

Five digits plus five digits gave five digits. And forty-eight thousand nine hundred and fifty-two, minus twenty-four thousand five hundred and forty-seven, is twenty-four thousand four hundred and five. Again five. Then it hands you a grid. Each row names how many digits the two inputs have, and how many the answer has, and asks for an example. And some of those rows have no example at all. Those are the interesting ones.

Because to show a row is impossible, an example is no use to you. You need an argument about the largest and the smallest. Take the sharpest one. Can two four-digit numbers add up to a six-digit number? The biggest four-digit number is nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine. So the biggest sum you could possibly get is that, plus itself. Nineteen thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight. Five digits. Not six. Not ever.

You have just ruled out every pair of four-digit numbers there is, in one line, without testing a single one. That is the difference between here is an example and here is a reason, and it is the habit the exercise is training. Now the next section, which is the same idea drawn instead of written. Your book puts six pictures in front of you and asks for the total of each.

Every one of them could be counted item by item. That is not what they are for. Each picture is arranged, and the arrangement is a hint about how to group. Look at the shape first. Decide what the repeated part is. Then the counting almost disappears. Let me do three of them with you. First picture. Five rows of numbers. Row one, four forties. Row two, five fifties. Row three, four forties. Row four, five fifties. Row five, four forties.

You could add twenty-two numbers one at a time. Or you could notice there are only two kinds of row here. Three rows of four forties. That is twelve forties. Four hundred and eighty. Two rows of five fifties. Ten fifties. Five hundred. Four hundred and eighty plus five hundred. Nine hundred and eighty. Two multiplications and one addition, instead of twenty-one additions. Second picture, and this one is engineered.

On top, a block of four rows of eight thirty-twos. Underneath, four rows of four sixty-fours. Count the top block. Four times eight is thirty-two, so there are thirty-two thirty-twos. Thirty-two thirty-twos is one thousand and twenty-four. Now the bottom. Four rows of four is sixteen, so sixteen sixty-fours. Sixteen sixty-fours is also one thousand and twenty-four. The two blocks weigh exactly the same. Half as many pieces, each worth twice as much.

So the total is two thousand and forty-eight, and you barely did any arithmetic. You noticed a trade. Last, the pictures made of dots and rings, and a warning that comes with them. One is an eight-by-eight grid of dice faces. Twenty of them show five dots. The other forty-four show one. Twenty fives is a hundred. Forty-four ones is forty-four. A hundred and forty-four. And then there is a bullseye. One thousand at the centre. Around it a ring of four five hundreds. Around that, eight two fifties.

And you can feel a pattern arriving. The value halves as you go out, the count doubles, so every ring after the centre is worth the same. Two thousand. Which would make the outer ring sixteen one-twenty-fives. Two thousand again, and seven thousand altogether. Except go and count that outer ring on the page. There are eighteen discs in it, not sixteen. So the outer ring is two thousand two hundred and fifty, and the real total is seven thousand two hundred and fifty.

The pattern was nearly true. And nearly true is wrong. Which is the last thing this section has to teach. Group by the shape, yes. But count the shape first. Next time, the same regrouping habit, used to estimate rather than to work things out exactly.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab