PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 3, Number Play
Chapter 3 · Number Play
Clock times and calendar dates: patterns the format lets you have
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google11 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
Every palindromic date this century falls in February — all 29 of them, no exceptions. Not a coincidence: the century picks the month before anybody picks a date.
The idea
Nothing happens to time at 12:21. The pattern is in the display — in how many digit slots a clock has and what each slot is allowed to hold. Because those limits are tight, the pretty times can be listed completely rather than hunted for, and the same goes for dates: eight slots with fixed ranges make a palindromic date a scarce and predictable event. Change the format and the patterns change with it, which is the sharpest possible statement of what this whole module has been arguing — a property of the writing is not a property of the thing.
What you should be able to do
- Explain why a "pretty" time is a fact about the display rather than about time
- List every time of a stated pattern on a 12-hour clock, and argue the list is complete
- Say how writing a leading zero on single-digit hours changes those lists
- Find the number of minutes from one palindromic time to the next
- Recognise a date whose digits repeat in blocks, and one that reads the same both ways
- Explain why palindromic dates are scarce, in terms of what each slot may hold
- State what the chapter asks about reusing a calendar, without overstating what it answers
- Use the fact that a common year is one day more than fifty-two weeks
- Given four digits, build the largest and smallest four-digit numbers and compute their sum and their difference
- Predict how changing one digit moves that sum and that difference
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| 12-hour clock | the display that numbers the hours 1 to 12 twice a day | §3.7, p.64 — printed there, in the opening sentence |
| calendar | the arrangement of a year's dates against days of the week | §3.7, p.64 — printed there |
| palindrome | a number or date written the same way whichever end you start from | §3.5, p.61 — printed there; used again in §3.7, p.65, for clock times |
| difference | what you get by subtracting the smaller arrangement from the larger | §3.7, p.64 — printed there, in question 1 |
| sum | what you get by adding the two arrangements | §3.7, p.64 — printed there, in question 1 |
| Manish | the pupil whose birth date has a repeating four-digit block | §3.7, p.64 — printed there |
| Meghana | his sister, whose birth date reads the same both ways | §3.7, p.64 — printed there |
| Jeevan | the pupil who asks whether a calendar could be reused | §3.7, p.64 — printed there |
| Pratibha | the pupil in the worked arrangement question | §3.7, p.64 — printed there |
| digit slot | the explanation's name for one writing position in a fixed display, with its own permitted range | an added term, not printed anywhere in the book |
Where people slip up
- "12:21 is special." The time is not; the display is. At the same instant a 24-hour clock shows something quite ordinary. Say this early or the whole section reads as numerology.
- "There must be lots of pretty times, we just have to find them." There are very few and they can all be written down. Completeness is the skill here, not discovery.
- "6:66 is a time." The second slot pair cannot exceed 59. Students extending 1:11, 2:22, 3:33 will run straight off the end of the minute range, and that is the right moment to make the ranges explicit.
- "Every clock writes the hour the same way." Some displays print 01:10 and some print 1:10. The lists of palindromic and repeating times are different in the two cases, and the book's own sample set is consistent with the leading-zero style.
- "A palindromic date is just a date with repeated digits." 20/12/2012 repeats a block; 11/02/2011 is a palindrome. The book prints one of each precisely because they are different conditions, and students merge them.
- "The chapter says a calendar repeats after so many years." It does not. It asks. Any figure the explanation gives must be presented as reasoning the class does, with the weekday-shift argument shown.
- "Rearranging digits changes the sum and the difference unpredictably." Both are fixed by the four digits, and the structure above says exactly how. Part (a) to part (d) become one decision instead of four searches.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 3.7 Q1, Figure it Out · 3.7 Q3
Transcript1,450 words
Somebody glances at a clock, sees four forty-four, and thinks: nice. Or ten ten. Or twelve twenty-one. Your book collects those three, and asks you to find every time of each kind. Nothing happens to time at twelve twenty-one. The second before and the second after are like any other second. The pattern is not in the time. It is in the display — in how many boxes the clock has, and what each box is allowed to hold.
Which makes it countable — and that is the whole video. So look at what the clock actually offers you. Four slots. An hour, then two minute slots — and not one of them is free. The hour runs from one to twelve. That is all. The first minute slot runs from zero to five. Nothing else, because sixty minutes means its digit never reaches six. The second minute slot is the only generous one. Zero to nine.
Those three ranges are the entire rulebook. Which means we do not have to hunt for pretty times. We can list them, and know when we have finished. Type one. Four forty-four. The hour digit, repeated in both minute slots. So we want h, colon, h, h. Let's try them. One eleven. Two twenty-two. Three thirty-three. Four forty-four. Five fifty-five. And then six. Six sixty-six? There is no such time. Sixty-six is not a minute reading.
And that is the first minute slot doing its job. It stops at five. So type one has exactly five members, and the list is complete, because the sixth is blocked by a rule we already wrote down. Type two. Ten ten. The hour block copied into the minute block. Ten ten. Eleven eleven. Twelve twelve. Those obviously work. But what about one? Does one o'clock give you one oh one?
And here it gets interesting, because it depends entirely on how your clock writes the hour. If it shows a leading zero, then oh one oh one works. So does oh two oh two, all the way up to oh nine oh nine. That is twelve times on the list. If your clock does not pad, so it says one rather than oh one, then only ten ten, eleven eleven and twelve twelve qualify.
Three times, not twelve. Same clock, same instants, different list. Type three. Twelve twenty-one. The whole display reading the same in both directions. With four slots and a leading zero, here is the complete list. Oh one ten. Oh two twenty. Oh three thirty. Oh four forty. Oh five fifty. And then it stops, because oh six sixty would need a minute reading of sixty. Then ten oh one. Eleven eleven. And twelve twenty-one.
Eight times in the whole twelve hours. That is the lot. And eleven eleven is on this list and the last one too. Some times are pretty in more than one way. Now let's take that leading zero seriously, because two honest people will give you two different answers here. Drop the padding, and a single-digit hour gives you three slots instead of four. One, colon, zero, one. Read it backwards: one, zero, one. That is a palindrome.
So one oh one counts. And so do one eleven, one twenty-one, one thirty-one, one forty-one, one fifty-one. And the same again for two, three, all the way to nine. Nine hours, six minute options each. Fifty-four palindromic times, instead of eight. So the answer to how many pretty times there are is not eight, and it is not fifty-four. It is: tell me what your clock looks like. Which is this whole module in one line. A property of the writing is not a property of the thing.
Your book asks a nice version of this. Start at ten oh one. How long until the next palindromic time? Do not search for it. Use the list. After ten oh one comes eleven eleven. Ten oh one to eleven oh one is sixty minutes. Then eleven oh one to eleven eleven is another ten. Seventy minutes. Now the one after that. Eleven eleven to twelve twenty-one. Eleven eleven to twelve eleven is sixty. Twelve eleven to twelve twenty-one is ten more. Seventy minutes again.
The same wait, twice. And that is not a coincidence — each step forward adds exactly one hour and ten minutes to the display. Now dates. Your book introduces two children with remarkable birthdays. Manish was born on the twentieth of December, twenty twelve. Write it out as digits. Two zero, one two, two zero one two. Look at that. Twenty twelve, and then twenty twelve again. The day and the month together spell out the year.
So how would you find another one? The day and month have to form the year, and that pins down the day completely. If the year starts with a twenty, the day has to be the twentieth. If it starts with nineteen, the day has to be the nineteenth. So the last century gave exactly twelve of these: the nineteenth of each month, from nineteen oh one to nineteen twelve.
And this century gives twelve more, the twentieth of each month from two thousand and one to twenty twelve. Manish's birthday is the last of them. The next one after his is the twenty-first of January, twenty one oh one. Eighty-nine years away. His sister Meghana was born on the eleventh of February, twenty eleven. As digits: one one, zero two, two zero one one. Now read that backwards. One one, zero two, two zero one one. The same.
Eight digits reading the same from either end. A palindromic date. And here is something your book does not tell you. Every single palindromic date this century falls in February. Not most of them. All of them. There are twenty-nine between two thousand and twenty ninety-nine, and every one is in February. Why? Because of the slots, again. A year in this century starts with a two and a zero. Two, zero, something, something.
For the date to read the same backwards, those two leading digits have to turn up at the very end, in reverse order. Which forces the month to be zero two. Zero two is February. There is no choice in it at all. The month was decided by the century, before anybody picked a date. And the scarcity comes from the same place. The day slot stops at thirty-one and the month at twelve, so most digit patterns are not legal dates at all.
A palindromic date is not rare because it is special. It is rare because the slots are tight. A third pupil, Jeevan, asks why we need a new calendar each year, and whether an old one could ever be reused. Your book asks that and does not answer it. So let's do the arithmetic. An ordinary year is three hundred and sixty-five days, and fifty-two weeks is three hundred and sixty-four. So a year is fifty-two weeks and one day left over.
That leftover day is why your birthday moves forward one weekday every year. A leap year is fifty-two weeks and two days, so it shifts you by two instead. For a calendar to be reusable, those shifts must add up to a whole number of weeks, and the leap-year status has to match too. Work it through and twenty thirteen's calendar, for instance, comes back in twenty nineteen. Six years later.
So yes. Keep your old calendars. Some come round again. Last, a different question, from a pupil called Pratibha. Take four digits. Four, seven, three and two. The largest arrangement is seven four three two. The smallest is two three four seven. Their difference is five thousand and eighty-five. Their sum is nine thousand seven hundred and seventy-nine. And then the book asks four things. Find digits making the difference bigger. And smaller. The sum bigger. And smaller.
You could guess. Or you could find the structure, which turns guessing into control. Sort your digits: biggest, second, third, smallest. The difference always comes out as nine hundred and ninety-nine lots of the biggest minus the smallest, plus ninety lots of the second minus the third. Check it. Seven take two is five, and five nine hundred and ninety-nines is four thousand nine hundred and ninety-five. Four take three is one, worth ninety more.
And that adds to five thousand and eighty-five. Exactly the printed answer. So to make the difference bigger, pull the outer two digits apart. The middle pair barely matters — they are worth ninety each, against nine hundred and ninety-nine. Next time, rearranging a sum so that you can do the whole thing in your head.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- Palindromes, and why reverse-and-add usually lands on oneClass 6 · Ch 3, Number Play
- How many numbers have a given number of digits, and why digit sums behaveClass 6 · Ch 3, Number Play
Either side of this one
- Kaprekar's 6174: a process that always ends in the same placeClass 6 · Ch 3, Number Play
- Rearranging a sum so it can be done in your headClass 6 · Ch 3, Number Play