PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 7, FractionsPrepShorts

Chapter 7 · Fractions

Mixed fractions: naming what lies past 1

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Fractions as numbers on a line10 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

10 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

Some fractions pass one whole and some do not, and you can tell which without working anything out.

The idea

Writing seven halves as seven halves is accurate but unhelpful: it tells you the step size and the step count and hides the one thing you actually want, which is how many whole units you have. The mixed form does not change the number at all — it regroups the same count, pulling out complete sets of two halves and leaving the remainder behind. That is why the conversion runs freely in both directions, and it is why the test "top number bigger than bottom" is not a rule worth memorising: it says only that you took more steps than one whole needs.

What you should be able to do

  • Sort a list of fractions into those under one whole and those over it
  • State the size test for a fraction that exceeds one whole, and explain why it must hold
  • Count how many whole units a given fraction contains
  • Rewrite a fraction greater than 1 in the mixed form, and name its two parts as the book names them
  • Rewrite a mixed form back as a single fraction, and explain the step that makes the two equal
  • Decide whether every fraction greater than 1 can be written in the mixed form, and say what happens at exact wholes
  • Place a mixed form on the number line

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
mixed numbera whole count written beside the fraction that is left overprinted in §7.5, p.162
mixed fractionthe book's second name for the same formprinted in §7.5, p.162
whole partthe count of complete units in a mixed formprinted in §7.5, p.162
fractional partthe leftover, which is always under one wholeprinted in §7.5, p.162
whole unitone complete unit, made of a full set of fractional unitsprinted throughout §7.5, p.161
numeratorhow many fractional units the fraction holdsprinted in §7.3, p.158; the test in §7.5 is stated in terms of it
denominatorhow many fractional units make one wholeprinted in §7.3, p.158; likewise
fractional unitthe step the count is made ofprinted in §7.1, p.152
improper fractionthe usual name elsewhere for a fraction at or beyond one wholean added term; not printed in this chapter
proper fractionthe usual name elsewhere for a fraction under one wholean added term; not printed in this chapter

Where people slip up

  • "The mixed form is a different, bigger number." It is the same number regrouped. Show both forms landing on the same point of the number line before any arithmetic.
  • "Two and two thirds means two multiplied by two thirds." The compact notation hides a plus sign, and that is genuinely confusing. Say the plus out loud every time the form appears, at least until section 10.
  • "To convert back, multiply the whole part by the denominator and add — that's the rule." It is the rule, but on p.163 the book earns it by replacing each whole with a full set of fractional units and counting. Show the counting first; the rule is what the counting collapses into.
  • "A fraction bigger than one is wrong and must be tidied into mixed form." Neither form is more correct. §7.8 will add fractions and leave answers in both forms on the same page.
  • "If the top is bigger the fraction is bigger." True only when the bottom numbers match. Nothing in this section compares two different denominators.
  • "Every fraction over 1 has a leftover." Four halves does not. The chapter's own eighths run in §7.3 ended exactly on a whole, and §7.5 puts the question to the reader directly on p.162. Section 9 should answer it, and answer it the way the book does, rather than leaving a student to meet the answer only in the solutions appendix.
Transcript1,440 words

Last time we put fractions on a number line and found that some of them land past the one. Here are the ones we drew. One half, two thirds, two fifths, four fifths — and then three halves, six fifths, seven fifths, eight fifths, nine fifths. Sort them by a single question: does this bar reach past one whole unit, or does it stop short? Four of them stop short. Five of them carry on past.

Nothing sits in the middle. Every fraction is on one side or the other, because a bar either reaches the one mark or it does not. That sort is the whole subject of this video. The ones on the right need a second way of being written, and by the end you will have it. Look only at the column that went past. Three halves. Six fifths. Seven fifths. Eight fifths. Nine fifths.

Something is true of every one of them, and it is not true of anything in the other column. The top number is bigger than the bottom number. Three beats two. Six, seven, eight and nine all beat five. Now check the left column. One half — one is smaller than two. Two thirds, two fifths, four fifths — smaller every time. So there is a test sitting here. If the top number is bigger, the bar goes past one whole.

But a pattern you have noticed is not yet a reason. Before we use it, let us see why it has to be true. Ask a simpler question first. How many steps does one whole unit take? If the unit is cut into five, then five of those steps bring you exactly to one. Not four, not six. Five. Cut it into three, and three steps close it. Cut it into eleven, and eleven do.

So the bottom number is not just a name. It is the number of steps that one whole costs. Now the test explains itself. The top number is how many steps you took. The bottom is how many one whole needs. Take more steps than one whole needs, and of course you end up past it. Take fewer, and of course you fall short. That is the reason. The rule was only ever a description of it.

Now we can ask a better question than which side of the one it lands on. How many complete whole units are inside it? Take three halves. Lay the halves out one at a time. First half. Second half — and those two close a whole. Third half. There is nothing to pair it with, so it sits outside on its own. Three halves is one whole unit, and one half left over.

Do it again with five halves. Two of them make a whole. Two more make a second whole. The fifth is left. Two whole units, and one half over. The number has not changed. We have only stopped counting halves and started counting wholes. The same story with a different step, because this is where it becomes obvious. Cut the unit into thirds. One third, two thirds — still short. Three thirds, and the whole closes exactly.

There is the fact we needed. Three thirds is one, precisely. So what does a fourth third do? It cannot fit inside a whole that is already full. It has to spill over the edge. Four thirds is one whole unit and one third past it. And notice you did not need the test to see that. You watched the whole fill up and watched the next piece land outside.

Your turn. Pause if you want to. How many whole units are inside seven halves? Two halves per whole. Two, four, six — that is three wholes — and a seventh half left over. Three whole units, and a half. Next. Four thirds. Three thirds make the whole, so it is one whole and one third. And seven thirds. Three, then three more — two wholes — with a seventh third over. Two wholes and one third.

Same move every time. Group the pieces into complete sets, count the sets, and keep what will not make another. Let us do one carefully and write it down properly. Eight thirds. Three thirds is a whole. Three more is a second whole. That uses six of them. Two are left, and two thirds is not enough for a third whole. So eight thirds is two whole units plus two thirds.

And here is the notation. Write the two, and write the two thirds beside it — no symbol between them. Two and two thirds. It says the same thing the sentence said, in less space. The number on the line has not moved. Eight thirds and two and two thirds are the same place. This form has a name. It is called a mixed number, or a mixed fraction — both names mean this.

It has two parts, and they have names too. The two in front is the whole part. The two thirds is the fractional part. The fractional part is always less than one whole. That is what makes it a leftover — if it reached a whole, you would have taken that whole out. Now the warning, and it matters. There is no symbol at all between the two parts, and that is genuinely confusing.

Two and two thirds does not mean two multiplied by two thirds. Two times two thirds would be four thirds, which is a different number entirely. The missing symbol is a plus. It is two plus two thirds. Say the plus out loud in your head every time you read one of these. Here is a question worth stopping on. Every fraction bigger than one — can all of them be written this way?

Try four halves. It is bigger than one, so it belongs in the right-hand column. Two halves make a whole. Two more make a second whole. And now stop, because there is nothing in your hand. Four halves is two. Exactly two. There is no leftover to write beside it. So the answer is no. A mixed number needs a fractional part, and a fraction that comes out to an exact whole has not got one.

Eight quarters does the same thing, and nine thirds, and ten fifths. When the bottom number divides the top exactly, you get a whole number and nothing else. Everything so far ran one way. Now run it backwards. Take three and three quarters, and write it as a single fraction. Do not reach for a rule. Just undo what we did — open each whole back up into quarters. One whole is four quarters. So the first whole opens into four, the second into four, the third into four.

Four plus four plus four, and then the three quarters that were already there. Count them all: fifteen quarters. Now look at what you just did. Three wholes, four quarters each — that is three times four. Then add the three. That is the rule people memorise, and here it is arriving as a shorthand for counting you have already done. Both directions, quickly, so the move is yours. Nine halves. Two per whole, so four wholes and a half. Four and a half.

Nineteen sixths. Six per whole. Twelve is two wholes, eighteen is three — and one over. Three and one sixth. Now the other way. Seven and two thirds. Seven wholes at three thirds each is twenty-one, plus two, is twenty-three thirds. Two and three elevenths. Two elevens is twenty-two, plus three, is twenty-five elevenths. And every one of those pairs is a single place on the number line, written two ways. The spelling changed. The number never did.

Three things to carry away from this. The bottom number tells you what one whole costs in steps. Take more steps than that and you have passed it — that is the whole of the size test. The mixed form is a regrouping, not a new number. Complete sets pulled out, remainder left behind, same place on the line. And there is a plus sign hiding in the notation. Read it every time, until you stop needing to.

One caution before we finish. Neither spelling is the correct one. Fifteen quarters is not untidy, and three and three quarters is not more advanced. You will meet answers written both ways, sometimes on the same page, and both will be right. Next time: comparing two fractions when the bottom numbers do not match — which is a harder question than it sounds.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab