PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 7, FractionsPrepShorts

Chapter 7 · Fractions

Measuring a length by choosing a smaller unit

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

What a fraction is9 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

9 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

When a length will not sit whole inside your unit, you do not need a cleverer number — you need a smaller unit. Fold the strip, and the awkward length becomes an ordinary count of steps. Read a fraction that way, as a count rather than a division, and its size becomes visible without any arithmetic at all: the bottom number sets the step, the top number counts them.

The idea

When a length will not sit whole inside your unit, you do not abandon measurement — you shrink the unit until it fits, and then count. Folding a strip in half, and in half again, manufactures smaller and smaller units on demand, and every fraction that results is a count of them. So the honest reading of the symbol is "three of the quarter-length", not "three over four": the bottom number tells you how big each step is and the top number tells you how many steps you took. Read that way, the size of a fraction is visible without any calculation at all.

What you should be able to do

  • Declare a chosen object to be one unit and measure other lengths against it
  • Fold a strip into halves, quarters and eighths and name each part
  • Build the run of multiples of a fractional unit and write each as a fraction
  • Explain why the last entry of such a run comes back to one whole
  • Read any fraction aloud as a count of fractional units, and say why that reading makes its size obvious
  • Name the two numbers of a fraction as the book names them
  • Make a thirds fold and use it to make sixths
  • Match a drawn piece to the fractional unit it represents

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
unitthe length everything else is compared against, here the whole stripprinted in §7.3, p.156
paper stripthe folded model the section measures withprinted in §7.3, p.156
creasethe fold mark that cuts the strip into equal partsprinted in §7.3, p.156
fractional unitone of those equal parts, used as a measuring stepprinted in §7.1, p.152; folded into being in §7.3
timesthe book's reading of a fraction as a repeated fractional unitprinted in §7.3, pp.156–158
numeratorhow many fractional units the fraction containsprinted in §7.3, p.158
denominatorhow many fractional units make one wholeprinted in §7.3, p.158
measureto express an amount as a count of chosen unitsprinted in the §7.3 title and on p.157
wholeone complete unit, the thing the run returns toprinted throughout §7.3, p.157
improper fractiona fraction at or beyond one wholenot printed in this chapter; the roti run passes one whole on p.157 without being given a name

Where people slip up

  • "Three quarters means three, divided by four, and I must do the division." The book's preferred reading removes the division from the act of understanding the size. Both readings are legitimate; the point of section 11 is that only one of them makes the size visible.
  • "Folding in half twice gives thirds." It gives quarters. Say the count out loud each time the strip opens, and count creases as well as parts — three creases, four parts.
  • "You cannot fold a strip into three." You can, and p.158 asks for it. It is the first fold in the section that is not a halving, and it is what makes sixths reachable by one more halving.
  • "Eight eighths is a fraction, so it cannot be a whole number." The last row of the eighths run lands exactly on the whole strip. Show the strip, not the symbol, when this arrives.
  • "A fraction is always smaller than one." The half-roti run on p.157 breaks this on its second column. Pre-empt it here, and hand the naming problem to §7.5 rather than solving it now.
  • "The denominator counts what I have." It counts how many of these steps make one whole. The numerator counts what you have. Section 12 should state both halves of that sentence together.
Transcript1,342 words

Here is a strip of paper. Nothing special about it. It is as long as it happens to be. And I am going to declare that this strip is one unit. One. The whole thing. That is not a discovery, it is a decision, and you are allowed to make it. Everything else in this video gets measured against this strip, and against nothing else. Now here is a shorter length. How long is it, in strips?

Not one strip. Less than one strip. And whole numbers have just run out of things to say. So we do not abandon the measuring. We make the unit smaller until it fits. Fold the strip in half. Press the crease. Open it back up. One crease. Two parts. And they are equal, because folding is what makes them equal. Each of those parts is one half of the strip.

So now I have a second measuring step available to me, smaller than the first. And notice the two numbers that just appeared. One crease, two parts. The number that matters is the two — the number of parts, not the number of folds. Two of these halves laid end to end give the whole strip back. That is what makes them halves. Fold it in half again, without opening it. Then open the whole thing out.

Count the creases. Three. Count the parts. Four. So each part is one quarter of the strip. And this is worth saying out loud, because people expect thirds. Folding in half twice does not give thirds. It gives quarters. Two folds, four parts. Now build the run. One quarter is one step. Two of them is two quarters. Three of them is three quarters. And four of them is four quarters, which is the whole strip again, back where we started.

One more fold. Three folds in total, and now open it right out. Seven creases. Eight parts. Each one is an eighth of the strip. The book prints this run and leaves most of it blank for you to fill in. So let us fill it in. One eighth. Two eighths. Three eighths. Four eighths — and look, four eighths reaches exactly halfway. Five eighths. Six eighths. Seven eighths, which is nearly the whole strip but not quite.

And eight eighths. Every one of those is a count. Not a calculation. You are just laying down steps and counting them. Now that last line deserves a proper look, because it bothers people. Eight eighths. That is written like a fraction, so surely it must be less than one? Put the symbol down and look at the strip instead. Eight eighths is eight of those little pieces, laid end to end. And eight of them is the strip.

So eight eighths is one. Not close to one — exactly one, and you can see it rather than believe it. The same thing happened with the quarters. Four quarters was the whole strip. Every run of a fractional unit closes back on one whole. That is what the number underneath is for. The book puts the point of this whole section in a box, and it is worth reading slowly.

Once you have chosen a fractional unit, a fractional amount becomes measurable. That is a bigger claim than it looks. Read it backwards. The problem at the start was a length that would not fit into whole units. The fix was not a cleverer number. The fix was a smaller unit. Choose the step small enough and the awkward length becomes an ordinary count of steps. Which is the same move a ruler makes when it drops from centimetres to millimetres, and the same move the whole of measurement runs on.

Now the section changes the object, on purpose, to show the strip was never the point. Forget paper. Here are pancakes, and each one is cut in half. One half is our fractional unit now. That is the step. Start collecting. One half. Add another. Two halves — and two halves is a whole pancake. Add another. Three halves. Then four halves, which is two whole pancakes. Then five halves. The step never changed. All that changed is how many you have.

And I want to stop on the third column of that run, because something quietly important happened there. One half is less than a pancake. Two halves is exactly a pancake. Three halves is more than a pancake. So a fraction has just gone past one whole, and nothing broke. That matters, because people carry a rule around that a fraction is always less than one. It is not. Three halves is a perfectly good fraction. It just happens to be bigger than the whole you measured it with.

The book does not stop to name that here, and neither will I. It comes back to it later in the chapter. For now, just notice that the run walked straight past one and kept going. The book then asks you to build the same run again with a different step, which is the real test of whether you have got it. So: quarters of a pancake. Same idea, smaller step.

One quarter, two quarters, three quarters, four quarters — and four quarters is one whole pancake. Keep going. Five quarters. Draw it: one whole pancake, and one quarter left over. And nine quarters. Two whole pancakes, and one quarter left over. You did not divide anything. You counted quarter-pieces and then bundled every four of them into a pancake. Compare the two runs side by side and the pattern is the same. Only the size of the step is different.

Back to the strip, because there is one fold we have not done. Every fold so far has been a halving, which is why we only ever got two, four and eight. You will hear people say a strip cannot be folded into three. It can. Curl it round and line the ends up. Three parts, and each one is a third of the strip. Now here is the nice bit. Fold that in half as well.

Each third splits into two, so there are six parts now, and each one is a sixth. Half of a third is a sixth. You got a new fractional unit for free, out of one extra fold. Which brings us to the last idea, and it is about how you say these things in your head. Three quarters. You might read that as three over four, or three upon four, or three divided by four.

None of those is wrong. But the book prefers a different reading, and I think it is right. Read it as three times one quarter. Three copies of the quarter-step. Here is why that reading is better. It tells you two separate things at once. The bottom number tells you how big each step is. The top number tells you how many steps you took. And that makes size visible without any arithmetic. Five sixths against five eighths — same count, and a sixth is a bigger step, so five sixths wins.

Three eighths against five eighths — same step, more of them, so five eighths wins. No calculating. Just reading. And now, finally, the two numbers get their names, which the chapter has been holding back until you had something to attach them to. Take five sixths. The top number, five, is called the numerator. The bottom number, six, is called the denominator. Say what each one does, in one sentence, and never mix them up again.

The denominator says how many of these steps make one whole. The numerator says how many you have got. So five sixths is: cut a whole into six, and take five of them. And none of this depended on paper. Do it with a circle, a square, a triangle — the argument is identical. Next time, that folded strip gets laid flat and turned into a number line, and every fraction gets a place to stand.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

The book

Open in a new tab