PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 9 Mathematics · Chapter 7, The Mathematics of Maybe: Introduction to ProbabilityPrepShorts

Chapter 7 · The Mathematics of Maybe: Introduction to Probability

Tree diagrams make the sample space of a two-step experiment visible

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Multi-step experiments10 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

10 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

A tree is not a tidier way of writing the list. It is two multiplications drawn — and branch numbers add at a split but multiply along a path.

The idea

A tree is not a tidier way of writing the list; it is two multiplication facts drawn. The number of complete paths is the product of the branchings at each step, and the probability of a path is the product of the numbers written along it. Fig. 7.6 draws both — six branches, each labelled a half, four paths — and the chapter then computes the probability of two heads by counting one path out of four instead. That shortcut is valid here only because every branch on this particular tree carries the same number, and the chapter's own next exercise breaks it: Basket A holds one apple and two oranges, so the four fruit pairs are not equally likely, and counting gives a quarter where multiplying gives a sixth. The tree survives the break. The counting does not.

What you should be able to do

  • State what a multi-step experiment is, using the chapter's own definition
  • Read a tree diagram: identify a branch, a path, a step and the outcome column
  • Explain why the number of complete paths is the product of the branchings
  • State what the number written on a branch is the probability of
  • Compute the probability of an outcome by counting paths, and say when that is valid
  • Compute the probability of a path by multiplying along it, and show the two agree for a fair coin tossed twice
  • Build a tree for an experiment whose branches carry different numbers, and explain why counting paths now gives the wrong answer
  • Build a tree for a draw made without replacement, and explain what changes on the second layer
  • Compute the size of a multi-step sample space without drawing the tree
  • Choose between a tree and a table for a given two-step experiment

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
tree diagrama branching picture that lays out every outcome of a multi-step experimentprinted as the heading and first word of §7.4 (p. 168)
multi-step experimentan experiment made of a series of trials one after anotherprinted in bold in §7.4 (p. 168)
branchone line of the tree, standing for one possible result at one stepprinted in §7.4 (p. 168)
independent trialstrials in which one result does not alter the next one's probabilitiesprinted in §7.4's definition of a multi-step experiment (p. 168); the word is used and never defined
single-step experimentthe kind of experiment the chapter has handled up to §7.4printed in §7.4 (p. 168)
outcomeone complete result of the whole experiment, read off the end of a pathprinted in bold in §7.2.1 (p. 160); the column heading in Fig. 7.6 uses it (p. 168)
sample spacethe list of all the complete results, which the tree producesprinted in §7.2.1 (p. 160), and read off the tree in §7.4 (p. 168)
theoretical probabilityfavourable outcomes over possible outcomes, restated at the start of p. 169printed in bold in §7.2.2 (p. 161) and its formula reprinted on p. 169
without replacementof a draw made after an earlier item has been kept outprinted in End-of-Chapter Q12 (ii) (p. 172); Q10 and Q13 (ii) describe the same thing in words (pp. 171–172)
patha complete route from the start of the tree to one of its endsprinted in §7.4's list of what a tree is useful for (p. 168)
multiplication along a pathmultiplying the branch numbers to get the probability of a complete outcomean added term; the chapter draws the numbers and never multiplies them
branchings multiplythe fact that the number of complete outcomes is the product of the choices at each stepan added phrasing; the chapter counts to four and never generalises

Where people slip up

  • "The tree is just a neat way of writing the list." It is the multiplication rule drawn. A list of four items tells you nothing about where four came from.
  • "The branch numbers add." At a single split they add to 1. Along a path they multiply. Confusing the two is the standard error, and the fair-coin tree hides it because 1/2 + 1/2 and 1/2 × 1/2 are both easy numbers to write down.
  • "Every path is equally likely." Only when every branch at every split is. Exercise Set 7.4 Q1 kills this on the page after the figure.
  • "Count the entries in the last column." For the fruit baskets that gives 1/4 in place of 1/6, and for the pens 1/3 in place of 29/81.
  • "Without replacement is a different topic." Same tree, different numbers on the second layer. Nothing about the drawing changes.
  • "Two steps means multiply the answer by 2." Two steps means multiply the number of branches, which is not the same and is often not 2.
  • "You always have to draw the tree." For a size, multiply the branchings. For six outfits, the chapter itself asks for a table.
  • "A tree needs independent steps." The chapter's definition says so and its own starred Q10 does not obey it. Trees handle dependent steps perfectly well; that is what the second layer's changed numbers are for.
Transcript1,431 words

Everything so far has been one step. Roll a die once. Draw one ball. Toss one coin. Now do two things in a row, and the experiment is called multi-step. Toss a coin twice. Draw a ball, then another. Take a fruit from one basket and one from a second. The list of outcomes gets longer, and writing it out by hand starts going wrong. So there is a picture for it, called a tree diagram, and it is the subject of this video.

It looks like an organiser. It is not: it is two multiplications drawn. Here is the tree for a fair coin tossed twice, with four things worth naming. From a starting point, two lines go out. Each line is a branch, and each branch stands for one result of one step. The first toss gives head or tail, so two branches. From the end of each, two more branches, because the second toss also gives head or tail.

A complete route from the start to an end is a path, and the whole tree has six lines drawn on it. Read off the ends and you get head-head, head-tail, tail-head, tail-tail. That is your sample space. The rest of this video is about the numbers on those six lines. First, why four ends and not three or five. There were two ways the first step could go, and from each of those, two ways the second could go.

So the count is not two plus two. It is two times two. That is the first multiplication the tree draws, and it does not stop at two steps. Roll a die three times and the tree has six branches, then six from each of those, then six again. Six times six times six is two hundred and sixteen paths, and nobody is drawing that. You do not need to. The branchings multiply, and the number comes out without the picture.

Now the numbers. Every one of the six branches on the coin tree carries a half. It is worth being exact about what that half is the probability of, because it is easy to get wrong. It is the probability of that one step going that one way. Not the probability of the whole outcome. Look at the second layer. The branch marked head means: given the first toss already happened, this one comes up heads.

A half. Every time, on every branch, on this particular tree. And notice what is not written anywhere on the picture: a quarter. No branch carries the probability of a complete result. So how do you get the probability of two heads? One way is to ignore the numbers entirely and just count. Four paths, one of them is head-head, so one quarter. That is the method from earlier: favourable outcomes over possible outcomes.

Try it on something with more than one path. What is the probability of one head and one tail? Two of the four paths qualify, head-tail and tail-head, so two over four, a half. Notice what happened there. The answer came from two separate paths, and they had to be put together. Hold on to that, because it is the second thing a tree makes you do, and it is not multiplying.

Here is the other way, and it is the one the picture is asking for. Follow the top path. Half on the first branch, half on the second. Multiply them. A half times a half is a quarter, the same answer counting gave. That is the second multiplication the tree draws: along a path, the numbers multiply. Be careful: at a single split those same numbers add, because something has to happen. Adding two halves gives one; multiplying them gives a quarter.

Down a path, multiply. Across a split they should already add to one, which is your check that you drew it right. For one head and one tail, each path is a quarter and the two quarters add to a half. Two methods, same answer. So why bother with the multiplying? Because now change one thing. One basket holds an apple and two oranges. A second holds a banana and a mango.

Take one fruit from each. What is the probability of an apple with a banana? The tree still has four ends: apple-banana, apple-mango, orange-banana, orange-mango. Count them and you get one in four. That answer is wrong. The first two branches are not halves. Apple is one of three fruits, a third, and orange is two of three, two thirds. Multiply along the apple-banana path: a third times a half is a sixth.

A sixth, not a quarter, and the gap is a twelfth. The tree was right and the counting was not. Counting is not a broken method, so it is worth seeing what went wrong. There are really six ways to pick, because the two oranges are two different oranges, and all six are equally likely. Count in that list of six and the sixth comes out correctly. The four-outcome list is those six with the oranges no longer told apart, and merging is not free.

Apple with banana is one of the six. Apple with mango is one. Orange with banana is two, and orange with mango is two. So the four ends carry a sixth, a sixth, a third and a third. Not a quarter each, and never were. Counting paths works only when the paths weigh the same, which on a fair coin they do and here they do not. It gets worse, and the next example shows how much.

A box holds three red pens, four black and two green. Take one, look, put it back, and take another. The first layer now has three branches: three ninths, four ninths, two ninths. What is the probability that both pens are the same colour? Nine colour-paths, three of them same-colour, so counting says a third. Multiply instead. Red then red is nine eighty-firsts. Black then black is sixteen. Green then green is four.

Add those three, because any of them will do, and you get twenty-nine eighty-firsts. A third is twenty-seven eighty-firsts, so counting is short by two, and this time it is not obvious at all. One more, and this one changes the tree itself. A basket holds four red balls and five blue. Draw one, keep it out, and draw again. The first layer is four ninths and five ninths. But the second layer depends on what you drew, because one ball is gone and eight are left.

Down the red branch three reds remain out of eight, so three eighths and five eighths. Down the blue branch four reds remain, so four eighths and four eighths. Red then blue is four ninths times five eighths, five eighteenths. Two blues is five ninths times four eighths, also five eighteenths. The same number, and the picture shows why: the same four numbers, in the other order. Do not read that as a rule. Four red and four blue, and they come apart at two sevenths and three fourteenths.

That last tree is worth a moment, because it breaks a definition. A multi-step experiment is usually defined as a series of independent trials: what happens first does not change the odds of what happens next. The coin is like that. The second toss does not know or care what the first one did. The balls are not. Taking a red one out changes the second layer, and the tree shows exactly how.

So the definition is too narrow for its own examples. The drawing does not care. Nothing about the picture changed: same shape, same lines, different numbers on the second layer. Independence is a property of the experiment, and the tree just reports it. Two last things. First, you do not always want a tree. Two shirts and three kinds of trousers give six outfits, and a two-by-three table shows them better.

Use a table for two steps with several choices each, and a tree when the branch numbers differ or there are three steps or more. Second, for a size you need no picture at all. Multiply the branchings. Four numbered balls drawn twice, putting the first back: four times four is sixteen. Not putting it back: four times three is twelve. A coin with one of six cards is two times six, twelve.

So: the ends multiply, the path multiplies, the split adds, and count the ends only when they weigh the same. Four sentences, and the picture holds all of them at once.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab