PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 8 Mathematics · Chapter 7, Area
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google10 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
The plan is not to find a formula. It is to find a rectangle.
The idea
Base times height for a parallelogram is the rectangle formula wearing a disguise. Cut the right triangle off one end, and the triangle needed to square off the other end turns out to be congruent to the one you removed — so a parallelogram and the rectangle on its base with its height enclose the same amount of material. What makes this a piece of mathematics rather than a piece of paper-folding is that the chapter refuses to accept that the pieces fit by looking at them: it names the missing triangle, checks three facts about it and invokes a congruence test. And that rigour is what pays: it licenses a whole family of differently shaped parallelograms on one base and one height to share an area while their perimeters differ, and it licenses either pair of sides to play the base.
What you should be able to do
- Construct a height of a given parallelogram and say why the article is "a" rather than "the"
- Cut a parallelogram into a triangle and a trapezium along that height
- Identify the triangle that would complete the trapezium into a rectangle, by construction rather than by guessing
- Verify with RHS that the completing triangle is congruent to the removed one, naming the three facts used
- Define dissection, and state what it preserves
- Show that the rectangle's longer side equals the parallelogram's base, using the common segment argument
- Compute a parallelogram's area from a base and its matching height, including when the base drawn is not horizontal
- Recover an unknown height from an area and a side, and explain why the shorter side carries the taller height
- Explain why a family of parallelograms with one base and one height have one area and many perimeters
- Compare a rectangle and a parallelogram built on the same two sidelengths, and justify which is larger
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| parallelogram | a quadrilateral whose two pairs of opposite sides are parallel | printed in this chapter, Part II §7.1 under the subheading "Parallelogram" (Part II pp.160, 161) |
| height | the perpendicular distance from a chosen base to the opposite side; a parallelogram has two | printed in this chapter, Part II §7.1 (Part II p.161, set in bold where it is defined) |
| base | the side chosen to measure from; either pair of a parallelogram's sides may be chosen | printed in this chapter, Part II §7.1 (Part II p.162) |
| dissection | cutting a figure into pieces and reassembling them into a different figure of the same area | printed in this chapter, Part II §7.1 (Part II p.161, set in bold where it is defined) |
| congruent | able to be laid exactly on top of one another, so equal in every measurement | printed in this chapter, Part II §7.1 (Part II pp.150, 155, 161) |
| RHS congruency criterion | the test that two right-angled triangles agreeing on hypotenuse and one leg are congruent | printed in this chapter, Part II §7.1 (Part II p.161) |
| trapezium | a quadrilateral with one pair of parallel sides; here, the larger of the two cut pieces | printed in this chapter, Part II §7.1 (Part II p.161) |
| Śulba-Sūtras | the ancient Indian texts on altar construction that supply several of this chapter's shape-transformation problems | printed in this chapter, Part II §7.1 (Part II pp.158, 164) |
| shear | sliding one side of a parallelogram along its own direction, which changes the shape and not the area | an added term; the chapter draws seven sheared parallelograms on Part II p.162 and names no such move |
| matching height | the height that belongs to the particular side chosen as base, as opposed to the other one | an added compression of the chapter's phrasing about a side and its corresponding height |
Where people slip up
- "The height is the other side." True only for a rectangle, which is why the chapter puts the 5 cm by 4 cm comparison in the same exercise set. In items (iii) and (iv) on Part II p.163 the height and the neighbouring side are visibly different lengths.
- "A parallelogram has one height." It has two, one for each pair of sides, and Part II p.162 makes a point of it. On Part II p.163 item 2(iii) the marked height 4.8 cm belongs to the 5 cm side, and the height belonging to the other pair of sides is a different number entirely. (Item 2 has sub-parts (i) to (iv); item 3 is the separate "Find QN" problem, so do not call 2(iii) the page's third item.)
- "Same sidelengths, same area." The 5 cm by 4 cm pair settles it. This is the misconception that most reliably survives the whole chapter.
- "A leaning parallelogram has less area than an upright one." It has less than the rectangle on the same sides, and exactly the same as the rectangle on the same base and height. Those are two different comparisons and students collapse them. Draw both comparisons in the same shot, or the confusion is guaranteed.
- "Cut and slide — obviously it fits." The chapter spends most of Part II p.161 refusing that answer. If the explanation shows the slide without the congruence check, it has taught a craft skill and no mathematics.
- "Cutting along any perpendicular works." For a strongly sheared parallelogram the foot of the perpendicular from A can land outside segment DC, and then ∆AXD is not the piece the printed argument describes. The escape is the question Part II p.162 asks next: use the other pair of sides as base. Worth one line, because a student who draws a very slanted example will hit it.
- "The rectangle obviously has the same width as the parallelogram's base." It does, but by the common-segment argument, not by inspection. That is the second place rigour is being taught.
- "The taller height belongs to the longer side." The other way round. Part II p.163 item 3 gives 6 cm against 12 cm and about 9.47 cm against 7.6 cm.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 4 Q1, Figure it Out · 4 Q2, Figure it Out · 4 Q3, Figure it Out · 4 Q4
Transcript1,445 words
Here is a parallelogram. We want its area, and we are not going to invent a new formula for it. We already know a rectangle: its two sides multiplied. So the plan is not to find a formula. The plan is to find a rectangle - to cut this shape up and rebuild it as a rectangle holding exactly the same amount. The whole of the mathematics is in those three words. If they really do.
First, a word about height. Pick a side to measure from. Call it the base. The height is the perpendicular distance from that side across to the one opposite. This shape has a base of fourteen, and standing on it, a height of eight. But turn it and measure from the slanted side instead. That side is ten, and its height is eleven point two. A parallelogram has two heights, not one, and they are different numbers.
So it is a height, never the height. And the height is not the side next door: eleven point two is not fourteen, and eight is not ten. Now the cut. From the top-left corner, drop a perpendicular straight down onto the base. That is the height, drawn in. Cut along it. One piece is a right-angled triangle. Its two short sides are the height, eight, and the lean, six - so its slanted side is the parallelogram's own slanted side, ten.
It holds twenty-four. The other piece is four-sided, with one pair of parallel sides left in it, and it holds eighty-eight. Twenty-four and eighty-eight make a hundred and twelve, the whole shape. Cutting creates and destroys nothing. Now slide the triangle across to the other end. Stop before you slide it. This is where a lesson goes wrong, because the obvious next line is: look, it fits. It does fit. But looking is not why.
So ask a different question. Forget the triangle we removed. Look only at the piece that is left, and ask what shape of gap it has. What triangle would you have to drop into that end to close this into a rectangle? Build that triangle, without glancing at the one in your hand. Then compare the two. If they turn out to be the same triangle, the fit is proved. If we just slide and admire, we have taught a craft skill and no mathematics.
Here is how to build it. Run the base line out past its right-hand end. From the top-right corner, drop a perpendicular down onto that extension. Where it lands, call the point Y. The triangle you have just drawn is the one that closes the gap - not chosen, constructed. And it too is right-angled, with legs of eight and six. Two right-angled triangles on the board, and we have to decide whether they are the same one.
Three facts settle it. One: the new triangle's upright side is eight, the same as the removed triangle's, because both are the height of the rectangle we are building. Two: both triangles have a right angle where the perpendicular lands. Three: their slanted sides are both ten - because they are opposite sides of the parallelogram, and a parallelogram's opposite sides are equal. A right angle, a matching slanted side, and a matching upright: that is enough to force two right-angled triangles to be identical.
Watch what happens if you drop the third fact. Here is a right-angled triangle whose upright is also eight. Same right angle, same eight. Its slanted side is seventeen, and it holds sixty, not twenty-four. One matching side pins down nothing at all. The fact that carries the argument is the one about the parallelogram - and it is the one students skip. So the pieces do fit, and we have a rectangle holding a hundred and twelve.
Its short side is the height, eight. Its long side is - and here is the second place to be careful - not obviously the base. It looks like the base. That is not a reason. Here is the reason. The off-cut at the left end is six. The off-cut at the right end is six as well, because it is the base of the triangle we just proved congruent.
Between them lies a stretch of eight, and that stretch belongs to the base and to the rectangle both. The base is that eight plus the left six. The rectangle's long side is that same eight plus the right six. Both are fourteen. One shared stretch, added to two equal off-cuts. That is why the widths match. Fourteen times eight is a hundred and twelve. Area equals base times height, and it is the rectangle formula in a disguise.
Cutting a shape into pieces and rebuilding them into a different shape of the same size has a name: dissection. It is very old, and the altar geometry of ancient India is full of it. And nothing in what we did depended on which side we started from. Take the slanted side as the base instead. It is ten. Drop a perpendicular across to the side opposite: eleven point two.
Ten times eleven point two is a hundred and twelve. The same shape, the same amount, measured completely differently. Any side will do, as long as you use the height that belongs to it. One honest warning, because anyone who draws a very slanted example will hit it. Lean the shape far enough and the perpendicular from the top corner lands past the end of the base, outside the shape altogether.
Then the triangle the argument talks about does not exist, and the cut cannot be made as described. Nothing is broken. The shape still holds a hundred and eighty. Use the other pair of sides. That side is twenty-five, its height is seven point two, and twenty-five times seven point two is a hundred and eighty. The escape was built in from the start: either pair may be the base.
Now watch what the formula does not care about. Here are seven parallelograms. Every one stands on a base of five, and every one is three tall. They lean by different amounts, and not even all the same way - three lean right, four lean left. Every single one holds fifteen. Base times height cannot see the lean. It never asked. The distance round the outside is a different story. The slanted side grows with the size of the lean, whichever way it goes.
The smallest lean here is about a third of a square, and the largest is nearly three. So the first one has the shortest way round and the last one the longest, and no two of the seven agree. One area, seven perimeters. Four to try. Each time, a side and the height that belongs to it. Seven and four gives twenty-eight. Five and three gives fifteen. The next two are measured from a slanted side, not a level one. Five and four point eight gives twenty-four; two and four point four gives eight point eight.
Look at the last pair: the height is four point four, the side only two. A height can be longer than its own side - it is a distance across the shape, not an edge of it. And one run backwards. A parallelogram with twelve along the bottom, standing six tall, holds seventy-two. Its other side is seven point six. So seven point six times the missing height is seventy-two, and the height is a hundred and eighty nineteenths - a shade under nine and a half.
That is bigger than six. The shorter side always carries the taller height, because the two products have to come out the same. One last comparison, and it decides whether any of this was understood. A rectangle five by four. A parallelogram whose sides are also five and four. Same two sidelengths. Both have a distance of eighteen round the outside. Stand them on the same base of five. For the rectangle, the four IS the height - it stands straight up.
For the leaning one, the four is the slanted side, and the height is a leg of the right triangle underneath it. Here it is three point two. Twenty against sixteen. And that is not special to this lean. Any lean at all makes the height shorter than the side, because a slanted side has to cover sideways distance as well as upward distance. So the same two sides do not mean the same area. What fixes the area is a base and its height - and that is exactly what the rectangle we built was telling us all along.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- Area as a count of unit squaresClass 8 · Ch 7, Area
- Why the area of a triangle is half base times heightClass 8 · Ch 7, Area
Comes up again in
- Area of a rhombus from its diagonalsClass 8 · Ch 7, Area
- Area of a trapezium, derived two different waysClass 8 · Ch 7, Area
Either side of this one
- Any polygon is a pile of trianglesClass 8 · Ch 7, Area