PrepShorts · Teaching notes · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 3, Finding Common Ground
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google11 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
These teaching notes are for members
What the video covers, what to say before it, where a class usually goes wrong, and what to set afterwards. An account is free, and it opens every chapter of every book.
What to assume they know
- Breaking a number down to primes, and why the result is unique — producing a prime factorisation
- Reading every factor of a number off its prime factorisation — subparts of a factorisation are exactly its factors
- HCF: take the fewest occurrences of each prime — the HCF built prime by prime from the smaller count
- Class 6 Prime Time: multiples, common multiples, and the Idli-Vada game
- Reading a list of multiples of a number and continuing it
What they should be able to do
- Recognise a "when do two repeating things line up" problem and say why it is a common-multiple problem
- State what the lowest common multiple of two numbers is
- Explain why there is no largest common multiple, and why that is the reason the lowest one is the useful extreme
- State what the factorisation of a multiple must contain, and check it on an example
- Build a common multiple by supplying every prime that either number needs
- Compute the LCM directly by taking, for each prime present, the larger of its two counts
- Say why supplying extra copies of a prime still gives a common multiple, and why it stops being the lowest
- Extend the same procedure to three numbers
Where it usually goes wrong
- "The LCM is the two numbers multiplied together." It is for 7 and 11, and it is not for 6 and 8, where the product is 48 and the answer is 24. The product is always a common multiple — that is why the LCM can never exceed it — but the shared primes get counted twice in it. Show 6 × 8 and 24 side by side.
- "Take the smaller count, as we did for the HCF." The constraint has reversed. For the HCF, a prime taken too often falls out of one of the numbers; for the LCM, a prime taken too rarely fails to hold one of them. Show the two failures next to each other.
- "More copies would be safer." Extra copies still give a common multiple — the book prints two such and poses a third as a question — they just stop it being the lowest. The word lowest is the whole specification.
- "There must be a largest common multiple as well as a lowest." There is not: double any common multiple and you have another one. The section asks after a largest one in those words and leaves the question open; an explanation that skips it wastes the chapter's best invitation.
- "A prime has to be in both numbers to enter the LCM." It does not. 5 appears only in 360 and still has to be in the LCM of 96 and 360, because without it the result is not a multiple of 360. Caution when explaining it: the book's sentence introducing this step on p.57 describes 2, 3 and 5 as appearing in both numbers, which is not so of the 5 — the working immediately below it makes clear that what is meant is the primes appearing across the two. Do not repeat the sentence as printed; state the correct condition.
- "The LCM is bigger than both numbers, always." It is at least as big as each of them, and it equals the larger one whenever the smaller divides it — which is the observation What HCF and LCM do for consecutive, even, and co-prime numbers opens on.
Questions to check understanding
- Find the LCM for two or three given numbers, showing the factorisations
- Word problems of the "when do these coincide again" kind: bells, buses, blinking lights, days of the week, repeating colour patterns
- Given two numbers and a proposed common multiple, decide whether it is the lowest and justify the decision
- Given the LCM and one number, work backwards to constraints on the other
- Add fractions by taking the LCM of the denominators — the use the closing exercise puts it to, in a problem the book credits to the ancient Indian mathematician Mahaviracharya (850 C.E.), whose name is worth speaking aloud (Part II, p.64, question 13)
- Decide, for two different primes, where their LCM must sit relative to the two numbers and to their product (Part II, p.64, question 10)
- The repeating-colour item at the head of the closing block (Part II, p.63, question 1) is an LCM question dressed as a picture
- The cowherd's cows, driven in equal numbers through 3 gates at one crossing, 5 at the next and 7 at the third, with fewer than 200 animals in all — an LCM(3, 5, 7) item the book marks as folklore mathematics from Karnataka, and a third cultural anchor for this section beside the toran and the gajak (Part II, p.63, question 5)
- Two more coincidence problems in the same block: 'Fire in the Mountain', where calling 6 and calling 9 leave the group whole while calling 10 does not (Part II, p.64, question 9), and the least number that every one of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 divides, which the book points back to Class 6 Chapter 5 (Part II, p.64, question 12)
- Two
Try Thisitems that stretch the idea past a plain LCM: the smallest number that 3, 4, 5 and 7 all divide but which leaves 10 on division by 11 — the printed item asks for the smallest, and without that word it has infinitely many answers (Part II, p.64, question 8), and the dog gaining 9 feet to the rabbit's 7 from a 150-foot head start (Part II, p.64, question 11)
Examples worth working on the board
- The torans (Part II, §3.2, p.55). Checked against the printed page. Inputs: Anshu's strips are 6 cm long, Guna's are 8 cm; strips are laid end to end; both hangings have to finish at the same length. The book prints the two lists it builds — 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54 and 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72 — notes 24 and 48 as two of the agreements, and settles on 24 cm. The page carries a colour illustration of two children on the floor laying pink and cream strips end to end.
- The open question on the same page (Part II, §3.2, p.55). Whether a largest common multiple exists is asked and left unanswered. It is the best question in the section.
- The gajak (Part II, §3.2, pp.55–56). Checked against the printed page; the page carries a photograph of a tray of the sweet with a caption naming its ingredients. Inputs: the shop gives it free every Monday, so every 7 days; Kabamai comes every 10 days; today is a Monday and she has just had some. The book prints multiples of 7 up to 77 and multiples of 10 up to 70, and reports 70 days.
- Idli-Vada (Part II, §3.2, p.56). Four pairs: 4 and 6; 7 and 11; 14 and 30; 15 and 55. The closing question — whether the first double call is always the LCM — is the one to show. The book notes that the last two pairs are the ones where listing became tedious.
- 36 and 648 (Part II, §3.2, pp.56–57). Inputs as the book gives them: 36 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 3, and 648 written as 36 × 18, then as (2 × 2 × 3 × 3) × (2 × 3 × 3). The observation to draw out is that 648's factorisation holds 36's entire factorisation with some primes to spare.
- Example 6 (Part II, §3.2, p.57). 14 = 2 × 7 and 35 = 5 × 7. The book prints two common multiples that are not the lowest — 2 × 7 × 5 × 7 × 3 and 2 × 2 × 5 × 7 × 7 × 11 — then asks whether 2 × 3 × 5 × 7 is one too, and then reports the lowest as 2 × 5 × 7 = 70, with the reason that stripping anything out of it breaks one of the two containments. The answer to that question is yes. 2 × 3 × 5 × 7 = 210 holds 2 × 7 and it holds 5 × 7, so 210 is a common multiple — 210 = 14 × 15 = 35 × 6 — and it belongs with the other two in the "too big" pile, not against them. An explanation that reads the unanswered question as a trap will contradict the page. None of the four printed products is a failure case: take the 5 out and 2 × 7 = 14 no longer holds 35; take the 2 out and 5 × 7 = 35 no longer holds 14.
- Example 7 (Part II, §3.2, pp.57–58). 96 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 and 360 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 5. The book walks the three primes in turn: five 2s against three, one 3 against two, no 5 against one. It reports 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 5 = 1440.
- The exercise set (Part II, §3.2, "Figure it Out", p.58). LCMs wanted for 30 and 72; 36 and 54; 105, 195 and 65; 222 and 370. Give these as inputs. The three-number item is the one that tests whether the rule was understood as a rule rather than as a two-column trick.
Figures to have open
- Two strip-hangings of adjustable unit length that grow until their totals agree. Standard schematic — redraw; do not reproduce the book's illustration.
- Two vertical ladders of multiples that can keep scrolling, with matching rungs highlightable. Reused for sections 2, 3 and 7.
- A day axis with two independent repeating tick patterns, for section 4.
- Two rows of prime factors with a containment highlight, so one row can be shown sitting inside another. This is the LCM counterpart of the ringing figure in HCF: take the fewest occurrences of each prime.
- No numbered figure exists to cite: this chapter prints no "Fig. 3.x" label anywhere on pp.47–66 (all twenty pages checked).
Where this sits in the book
- NCERT Ganita Prakash, Class 7, Part II, printed Chapter 3 "Finding Common Ground", §3.2 "Least, but not Last!", pp.55–56 — the toran problem, the open question about a largest common multiple, the gajak problem, the naming of the LCM, and Idli-Vada
- Same section, "Finding LCM through Prime Factorisation", Part II, pp.56–58 — 36 and 648, Example 6, Example 7, and the statement of the maximum rule
- Same section, "Figure it Out", Part II, p.58
- Same chapter, SUMMARY, Part II, p.65, the LCM bullet and its two sub-bullets
- Same chapter, closing exercises, Part II, pp.63–64, questions 1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 — the repeating stars, the Karnataka cowherd, the two
Try Thisitems, 'Fire in the Mountain', the two-primes multiple choice, the smallest multiple of the small numbers, and Mahaviracharya's fractions - Backward pointer: HCF: take the fewest occurrences of each prime, whose argument this one mirrors
- Forward pointer: Conjecture and generalisation: what mathematicians mean by those words, where the HCF and the LCM are tied together by one product relation