PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 4, Expressions using Letter-Numbers
Chapter 4 · Expressions using Letter-Numbers
The dropped multiplication sign, and what it silently means
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google9 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
4n is not a new object. It is 4 × n with a symbol the reader is expected to put back, every single time.
The idea
4n is not a new object; it is 4 × n with a symbol the reader is expected to put back. The convention is safe only because exactly one operation is ever allowed to disappear — plus and minus are always written — so a gap between a number and a letter can only ever mean multiplication. Half the faulty cards the chapter puts up for diagnosis come from restoring nothing at all into that gap, so that the number and the letter are read as two digits standing side by side; the rest come from giving the restored multiplication the wrong reach, or from a negative or a bracket that was not carried through. All of them are settled the same way, by working the expression out at a value — which is why 5u and 5 + u have to be shown to be different rather than asserted to be.
What you should be able to do
- Rewrite 4 × n in the chapter's shortened form and back again
- State the order convention — the number is written first, the letter or letters after it
- Find the value of an expression such as 7k or 5m + 3 for a given value of its letter-number, restoring the hidden multiplication sign before computing
- Diagnose a wrong substitution: say which step went wrong and what the value should be
- Show that two expressions are different by finding one value of the letter that separates them
- Explain why 10y – 3 and 10(y – 3) are not the same, in terms of what the multiplication acts on
- Say why a missing sign can only mean multiplication
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| omission of the multiplication symbol | the convention that 4 × n is written 4n | printed in the §4.3 heading, Part I, p.86 — the heading says symbol, not sign; extraction splits the first word, so this was verified on p.86 |
| multiplication sign | the × that the convention removes | printed in Part I, §4.3, p.87 — the body prose does switch to sign, so both words are the book's |
| sequence | a list of numbers in a fixed order | printed in Part I, §4.3, p.86 |
| nth term | the entry sitting at a general position in a sequence | printed in Part I, §4.3, pp.86–87 |
| multiple | a number obtained by multiplying by a whole number | printed in Part I, §4.3, p.86 |
| letter-number | a letter used in place of a number | printed in Part I, §4.1, p.82 |
| algebraic expression | an expression built from numbers and letter-numbers | printed in Part I, §4.1, p.82 |
| value (of an expression) | the number an expression names once its letters are replaced | printed in Part I, §4.3, p.87 |
| brackets | the marks that fix which part is treated as one number | printed in Part I, §4.2, p.85 |
| coefficient | the number written in front of a letter-number | an added term; not printed in this chapter, which describes the number-then-letter order without naming the number |
Where people slip up
- "4n is a two-digit thing, like 42." Card 2 of the p.87 block is exactly this error: 3d at d = 6 read as the digits 3 and 6 side by side. Card 4 is the same error with an addition behind it — 2r at r = 8 read as 28, then 1 added to reach the printed 29, where the value is 17.
- "5u and 5 + u are two ways of writing the same thing." The chapter does not merely deny this; it sets up a test. One value of u on which the two disagree settles it.
- "Since the sign is invisible, it happens last." The order of operations is untouched by the convention. 5m + 3 multiplies before it adds, exactly as 5 × m + 3 would. Card 3 on p.87 (3s – 2 claimed to be 15 at s = 7) is what happens when this slips: the 3 has been made to multiply the whole of s – 2 rather than s alone, and the value is 19.
- "You can drop the plus sign too, if it is obvious." Nothing is written without a sign except a multiplication. That is the entire safety of the convention: seeing no sign, there is only one thing you can put back.
- "Brackets are decoration once you know the values." 10y – 3 and 10(y – 3) contain the same three symbols and agree at no value of y at all: the first stands 27 above the second wherever you look, because the letter falls out of the difference between them.
- "A minus in front of a bracket only affects the first thing inside." Card 9 on p.87 is this error wearing a disguise: subtracting (3 – n) when n is larger than 3 means subtracting a negative.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 4.1 Q4
Transcript1,339 words
Here is a list. Four, eight, twelve, sixteen, twenty, twenty four, twenty eight. The multiples of four, in order, and it is obvious how it carries on. So here is a question you can answer with no algebra at all. What is the third entry? Twelve, and you did not count your way to it. You worked out four times three, because the third entry is three fours. The twenty ninth entry is four times twenty nine, which is a hundred and sixteen.
Every entry is four times its own position in the list. That is the whole pattern. But now ask for the entry at some position nobody has named yet. You need a way to write four times a position you have not been told. Call that position n. It is only a name for a number nobody has said out loud. Then the entry sitting at that position is four times n.
Write it with the multiplication sign in, exactly as you would with any number. Four times n. One line holding the whole list, every position at once. Put three in for n and it says four times three. Twelve. Put twenty nine in and it says four times twenty nine. A hundred and sixteen. Nothing clever has happened yet. That is still ordinary multiplication. But this expression is about to be written differently, and the difference matters.
Because one of those symbols is about to disappear. The multiplication sign comes out. Four times n is written four n. The two symbols close up, and the cross between them is simply gone. There is an order to it as well, and the order is not optional. The number goes first and the letter after it. Four n, never n four. So four n is not a new object, and it is not a new kind of quantity.
It is four times n, with a symbol you are expected to put back. Every single time you read it. That is the entire deal. And a convention that asks you to restore something silently is worth being suspicious of. So the first real question is why it is safe at all. The reason is simpler than you might expect, and it is the whole foundation. Exactly one operation is ever allowed to vanish. Multiplication, and nothing else.
A plus is always written. A minus is always written. Nothing else is ever left out, so nothing else can be hiding in that gap. See a number and a letter sitting together with no sign between them. There is exactly one thing you could put back, so there is nothing to decide. If plus could be dropped too, four n would be genuinely unreadable. It might mean four times n, or four plus n, and nothing anywhere would tell you which.
The convention works because it is stingy. One operation, and no more than one. So reading these is a habit, and the habit is to restore the sign first. Take seven k, and suppose k is four. Write it out. Seven times four. Then compute. Twenty eight. Two steps, and the first is the one people skip. Now something slightly harder. Five m plus three, with m equal to two.
Restore the sign, and it reads five times m, plus three. Multiplication happens before addition, exactly as it always did. Five times two is ten, and ten plus three is thirteen. Add first and you would get twenty five, and the sign being invisible never made that allowed. Which brings us to an exercise that is not the one you expect. Nine finished substitutions. Somebody has already done all the work.
Each one names a value for its letter, and states an answer. Your job is not to compute them. It is to audit them. That is a genuinely different skill, and it is the one that gets tested. Before you start, one warning that changes how you read the whole board. Eight of these nine are wrong. Exactly one of them is already correct. Go looking for nine mistakes and you will invent one, which is worse than missing one.
The wrong eight fall into three families, and every family deserves a name. Family one, and it is half of them. Nothing restored into the gap at all. Three d, with d equal to six, answered as thirty six. The three and the six have been read as two digits standing side by side. Not three times six, which is eighteen. Just thirty six, as a numeral. Two r plus one, with r equal to eight, answered as twenty nine.
The same error dressed up: two and eight became twenty eight, and then one was added. It happens twice more, and one of those loses an entire term along the way. Now here is what makes this family worth naming out loud. It is never accidentally right, and it always gives too much, so a surprisingly large answer is the first place to look. Family two. The sign does get restored, but it is given the wrong reach.
Three s minus two, with s equal to seven, answered as fifteen. Fifteen is three times five, so the three was made to multiply all of s minus two. There is no bracket there, so the three multiplies s and nothing else. Three times seven is twenty one, and twenty one minus two is nineteen. Four out, purely from a mistake about what the multiplication touches. The same family catches a harder one. Three, bracket, m plus one, with m equal to minus six.
Answered as nineteen, which is three times six plus one: the bracket ignored, the minus discarded. Honour the bracket and m plus one is minus five, and three of those is minus fifteen. Family three. A negative that did not survive the journey. Ten minus a, with a equal to minus four, answered as six. Six is ten minus four. The minus sign on the value has quietly gone missing.
But you are taking away minus four, and taking away a negative adds. Ten take away minus four is fourteen. The last one is the same idea, hiding inside a bracket. h minus, bracket, three minus n, with h equal to five and n equal to six. The bracket is three minus six, which is minus three, and taking away minus three adds three. So it is eight, and notice that every one of these was settled the same way, by working it out at the value.
Which is exactly the technique for a question people get genuinely stuck on. Is five u the same thing as five plus u? They look similar. A five, a u, and not much else in either of them. And you do not need an argument to settle it. You need one value. Let u be eleven. Five u is fifty five. Five plus u is sixteen. That is enough. One value where they disagree closes the question forever.
Try more anyway, because watching them stay apart is worth something. u is two, ten against seven. u is eight, forty against thirteen. u is five, twenty five against ten. No whole number ever makes them meet, and one disagreement was always all it took. One last pair, and this one is sharper. Ten y minus three, against ten, bracket, y minus three. The same three symbols. The only difference is a pair of brackets.
In the first, the ten multiplies y, and then three comes off the result. In the second, three comes off y first, and the ten multiplies what is left. Let y be two. The first gives seventeen. The second gives minus ten. y is nought, minus three against minus thirty. y is seven, sixty seven against forty. y is ten, ninety seven against seventy. Now watch the gap, because it never moves.
It is twenty seven every time, the letter falls out of the difference entirely, and so there is no value where they meet.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- A letter-number stands for any number, not one numberClass 7 · Ch 4, Expressions using Letter-Numbers
- Why every rule of arithmetic carries over to algebraClass 7 · Ch 4, Expressions using Letter-Numbers
Comes up again in
- Collecting like terms, and what "simplest form" is forClass 7 · Ch 4, Expressions using Letter-Numbers
- Turning a pattern into a formula that predictsClass 7 · Ch 4, Expressions using Letter-Numbers