PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 6, Constructions and TilingsPrepShorts

Chapter 6 · Constructions and Tilings

Copying an angle, and why triangle congruence proves it works

यह वीडियो हिंदी में भी · Watch in Hindi

Angles you can build without a protractor9 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

9 min.

Also recorded in Hindi.Englishहिन्दी

A compass carries a length. It cannot carry an angle — there is nothing on the instrument that holds one.

The idea

A compass can carry a length from one part of the page to another. It cannot carry an angle — an angle is not a length, and there is nothing on the instrument that remembers one. So the construction does something cleverer than transferring: it converts. Cut both arms of the angle at one radius and the straight distance between the two cut points now stands in for the angle, because with two sides already fixed by that radius the third side has only one shape left to allow. Copy that one distance, let SSS rebuild the triangle, and the angle comes back exact. The pay-off arrives two pages later: since parallel lines were already characterised by equal corresponding angles, being able to copy an angle is the same thing as being able to draw a parallel.

What you should be able to do

  • Explain why a compass alone cannot transfer an angle directly
  • Describe how cutting both arms at one radius turns an angle into a triangle
  • Identify the one length that has to be carried across, and say why the other two are free
  • Carry out the five-step angle-copying construction
  • State the congruence condition that proves the copy is exact
  • Explain how copying a corresponding angle produces a parallel line
  • Carry out the parallel-line construction with a compass and an unmarked ruler
  • Use repeated copies of one unit, in two orientations, to build a repeating band

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
exact copya second figure matching the first in every length and angleprinted in §6.1, Part II, p.145
unitthe single shape a repeating design is built out ofprinted in §6.1, Part II, p.145
orientationthe direction a copy faces after being turned or flippedprinted in §6.1, Part II, pp.145, 147
isosceles trianglea triangle with two equal sidesprinted in §6.1, Part II, p.146
SSS congruence conditionthree pairs of equal sides, which force congruenceprinted in §6.1, Part II, pp.144, 147
transversala line cutting across two othersprinted in §6.1, Part II, p.147
corresponding anglesthe matched pair of angles a transversal makes at two linesprinted in §6.1, Part II, p.147
parallelsaid of two lines in a plane that never meetprinted in §6.1, Part II, pp.147–148, including the mark m ‖ n in Fig. 6.10
set squarethe older drawing aid this construction replacesprinted in §6.1, Part II, p.147
arcpart of a circle drawn from a centre at a fixed radiusprinted in §6.1, Part II, pp.146, 148
radiusthe compass opening an arc is drawn withprinted in §6.1, Part II, pp.146, 148
chordthe straight segment joining the two ends of an arcan added term for the transferred length BC, not printed in this chapter — the chapter names it only by its endpoints

Where people slip up

  • "Just measure the angle and draw it again." That is the protractor answer, and it is the one the chapter has ruled out since p.140. It is also less exact: a protractor reading is rounded, a carried compass span is not.
  • "The compass copies the angle." It copies one length. The angle is reconstructed by congruence afterwards. Keep those two steps visibly separate in the figure.
  • "The arc radius has to be some particular size." It does not — but it has to be the same at A and at X. Every equality in the proof comes from that single reuse.
  • "You have to carry all three sides across." Two of them are already equal because one radius made them. That is the economy the isosceles remark on p.146 is pointing at.
  • "Parallel means the same distance apart, so this construction is about distance." The construction never measures a gap. It works through the equal corresponding angles the chapter recalls on p.147.
  • "Two orientations means two different units." Fig. 6.6 repeats one shape; what alternates is how it is turned. If the explanation draws two shapes, it has broken the argument of the section.
Transcript1,358 words

Here is a band, running along the edge of something. The same shape, over and over, but not the same way up each time. One leans this way, the next one leans the other, and the outline rises and falls. Now look at what is actually repeating. It is one shape, not two. The second one is the first one turned over. Nothing about it is new. So if you can draw the unit once, and copy it exactly, you can draw the whole band.

Which puts the weight on that word: exactly. What does an exact copy actually cost you? Two things, and they are not the same kind of thing. The lengths have to match, and the angles have to match. Get the lengths right and the angles wrong and you have a different shape. Get the angles right and the lengths wrong and you have the same shape at the wrong size, which is also not a copy.

A copy that is right about one and wrong about the other is not a near miss. It is a different figure. So you need both. And one of the two is easy. Lengths are what a compass is for. Open it to a distance, lift it, put it down somewhere else, and the distance came with you. That is the whole trick, and it is exact: nothing was read and nothing was rounded.

Now try the same thing with an angle. Open the compass to the angle. You cannot. There is nothing on the instrument that holds one. A compass remembers one number, and that number is a length. Two figures can have the same angle and share no length at all, so knowing a length tells you nothing about an angle. So we do not transfer the angle. We convert it into something a compass can carry.

Here is the move. Put the compass point on the corner, open it to anything, and cut both arms with one arc. Two marks now, one on each arm. Call them B and C. And here is what you have quietly built: a triangle. Corner to B, corner to C, and B straight across to C. The two arms of that triangle are equal, because one radius made them both.

Which means the only thing left that is not already decided is that third side. Look at what happens to that third side as the angle opens. Narrow angle, the two marks are close together and the distance across is small. Open it up and they move apart, and it grows. Every single time, in the same direction. It never doubles back, so two different angles can never hand you the same distance.

And that is the bridge. At one fixed radius, that one straight distance and the angle determine each other completely. Put numbers on it if you like. Cut the arms at twenty-five and this particular angle gives a distance across of exactly thirty. Thirty is not the angle. But at a radius of twenty-five, thirty and that angle mean the same thing, and you can get from either one back to the other.

The distance is now standing in for the angle. And a distance is exactly what a compass can carry. Over to the new place. A bare ray, and the corner it will start from. Do not change the compass. That opening is load-bearing now. Put the point on the new corner and strike the same arc. It cuts the ray at one point. That is one of the two marks you need.

The other one has to go somewhere on that arc, and where it goes is the whole question. Every point on that arc is the right distance from the corner. Only one of them is at the right distance from the first mark. Now go back and pick up the length that matters. Open the compass to the distance between the two original marks. Not to an arm, to the gap across.

Carry it over. Put the point on the mark on the ray, and cut the arc. There is the second mark. One journey, one length. The arms did not have to travel, because the radius already put them in place at both ends. Now rule the line from the new corner out through that second mark. That is the copy, and nothing was measured anywhere in it. Why is it exact, though, rather than close?

Line up the two triangles and count what they share. First arm to first arm: equal, one radius made them. Second arm to second arm: equal, same radius again. Third side to third side: equal, because you carried it. Three sides matching, and three matching sides force two triangles to be identical in every other way as well. So the angle at the new corner is the angle you started with. Not to the nearest degree. The same angle.

One warning, and it is the thing that goes wrong. The size of that first arc is entirely yours to choose. Small, large, it makes no difference. What matters is that the same opening is used at both ends. Take an angle whose arms you cut at twenty-five, giving a distance across of thirty. Now strike the arc at the new corner at fifty instead, and carry that thirty across anyway.

You do not get a slightly wrong angle. You get a definitely wrong one, and a much narrower one, because the same span reaches across far less of a bigger circle. And if the arc is smaller than half the distance you are carrying, the two never meet and you get no angle at all. Now the part that makes this worth having. Think back to what made two lines parallel.

Run a third line across both of them, and look at the two angles in matching positions. When those two match, the lines are parallel. That was the characterisation. Read it the other way round and it is an instruction. If you can copy an angle, you can build that matching pair on purpose. Which means you can draw a parallel line through any point you like, with a compass and a straight edge and nothing else.

Here it is. A line, and a point somewhere off it. Rule any line at all from that point down to the given line. It does not matter what angle it makes. That crossing gives you an angle. Cut both its arms with one arc. Now go up to your point and strike the same arc, cutting the slanted line above. Carry the one distance across, mark it off, and rule the line through your point and that new mark.

The angle at the top now matches the angle at the bottom, in matching positions. So the new line is parallel to the old one, and you built it by copying an angle. Notice what never happened in that. Nobody measured the distance between the two lines. People often say parallel means staying the same distance apart, and the lines do. But that gap was never an input. Nothing in the construction asked for it or used it.

It came out at whatever it came out at, decided entirely by where you put your point. Move the point further up and the gap gets bigger, and not one step of the construction changes. The construction runs on angles. The equal distance is a consequence. So, two things to go and build. The band from the start. One unit, copied along, turned over every other time. And an eight-pointed star, which looks like a harder problem and is not.

Look at its edges, and you will find them in parallel pairs, opposite sides facing each other across the middle. Every one of those pairs is one copied angle away from the pair before it. Which is the whole of what you have been given here, and it is smaller than it looks. A compass never knew what an angle was. You gave it a length to carry instead, and it brought the angle back for you.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Builds on

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab