PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 7 Mathematics · Chapter 6, Constructions and Tilings
Chapter 6 · Constructions and Tilings
Constructing 60° from an equilateral triangle, and the arches built on it
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google9 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
An arch is a curve, and a curve is the one thing a hand cannot repeat. So the drawing does not start with the curve.
The idea
Count the angles this chapter actually constructs and there are only two seeds: 90°, which fell out of the perpendicular bisector, and 60°, which falls out of an equilateral triangle. Everything else within its reach — 45° built on p.144, 120° read off the line beside 60°, and 30° and 15° left standing as a question the same two moves answer — is one of those two halved or added. And 60° costs nothing at all, because a compass held at a single opening and swung from the two ends of that same opening has no choice but to produce three equal sides. The arches are the argument for why any of this matters: a trefoil or a pointed arch is a curve no hand can draw twice the same, and the moment its support lines are pinned by equal lengths and equal angles, it becomes something a mason can cut in stone and a student can reproduce exactly.
What you should be able to do
- Explain why an arch has to be reduced to support lines before it can be drawn
- Identify the equalities a trefoil arch's supports require, and build them
- Build the supports of a pointed arch from two equal segments and their midpoints
- Construct a 60° angle with a compass and an unmarked ruler
- Explain why the two arcs of that construction force an equilateral triangle
- Derive 30° and 15° from 60° by bisection
- State which angles in this chapter are constructed, and trace each back to 90° or 60°
- Say where exactness ends and design choice begins in an arch drawing
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| arch | a curved span built over an opening | printed in §6.1, Part II, pp.149–151 |
| trefoil arch | an arch whose head is made of three lobes | printed in §6.1, Part II, p.149 |
| pointed arch | an arch whose two curves meet in a point at the top | printed in §6.1, Part II, pp.150–151 |
| support lines | the skeleton drawn first, which the finished figure hides | printed in §6.1, Part II, pp.149, 151; also written supporting lines on p.150 |
| equilateral triangle | a triangle with three equal sides | printed in §6.1, Part II, pp.151–153 |
| radii | the several arc openings an arch design is tuned with | printed in §6.1, Part II, pp.137, 140, 149 (p.151 has the singular radius) |
| compass | the instrument that holds one opening while it turns | printed in §6.1, Part II, pp.152–154 |
| symmetry | the matching of a figure's two halves | printed in §6.1, Part II, pp.136, 149 |
| plane surface | the flat sheet or stone face the design is first drawn on | printed in §6.1, Part II, p.149 |
| inflexed arc | the name given to the first of the p.154 design exercises | printed in §6.1, Part II, p.154 |
| Wavy Wave | the Class 6 construction the pointed arch is built on | printed in §6.1, Part II, p.150 |
| equilateral | having all sides equal | printed in §6.1, Part II, pp.151–153, and in the SUMMARY, p.163 |
Where people slip up
- "An arch is a semicircle." Neither of the chapter's two arches is. The trefoil is three lobes and the pointed arch has a corner at the top; both are built from arcs whose centres are not the middle of the span.
- "There is one right radius for the arch." The chapter says outright that the radii can be adjusted so the arch looks better. The geometry fixes the supports; the curves are a design decision. Keep the two apart.
- "60° must be measured with a protractor." It is the one angle that arrives free: three equal sides, hence three equal angles, hence 180 ÷ 3.
- **"The 60° construction needs a specific radius."** Any opening works, as long as the same one is used from A and from B. That reuse is what makes the three sides equal.
- "So a compass can build any angle." It cannot. Everything this chapter constructs comes from 90° or 60° by halving and combining, and a student who believes otherwise will look for a 65.5° construction that is not there.
- "The two base angles of the trefoil have to be measured." They are copied — which is exactly the construction of Copying an angle, and why triangle congruence proves it works, and the reason that topic comes first.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 6 Q1, Figure it Out · 6 Q2
Transcript1,318 words
Look at an arch, any arch, and ask how you would draw it exactly. Not roughly. Exactly, and twice, so that the second one matches the first. Here are two of them, and neither is the shape people expect. This one carries three lobes across the top, like a clover leaf turned on its side. This one comes to a point, with a corner where the two curves meet. Neither of them is a half circle sitting on the opening.
And a curve is the one thing a hand cannot repeat. So before any of it is cut in stone, it is drawn flat. And the drawing does not begin with the curve. It begins with a few straight lines that the finished arch will hide completely. Those lines are the skeleton, and everything exact about the arch lives in them. Pin the skeleton with equal lengths and equal angles, and anyone can rebuild it anywhere.
Then hang the curves on it. Which means one drawing holds two very different kinds of decision, and they are worth keeping apart. Take the clover one first. Here is its skeleton, with the curves stripped off. A straight base, with a corner at each end. From each corner, an arm leans inward and upward. Two conditions hold it together, and only two. The angle at the left end equals the angle at the right end.
And the two arms are the same length as each other. The angles go down first, copied from one end to the other rather than measured, and only then are the arms stepped off. Now look at what those two conditions did on their own. The tops of the two arms came out level with each other. The whole figure folds onto itself down the middle of the base. Nobody measured for symmetry. Equal angles and equal arms delivered it.
Even the two long crossing lines came out equal, and nobody asked for those at all. That level top is the gap the big middle lobe has to cross. Here the base is seventy-eight wide and the arms are twenty-five, which leaves a gap of forty-eight. Both conditions are doing work. Drop either one and the figure comes apart. Keep the two angles equal, but make one arm longer than the other.
Now one arm top is higher than the other, and the fold down the middle fails. Or keep the arms equal, and tilt one of the angles. The same thing happens. The tops sit at different heights and there is no mirror. Equal angles on their own are not enough, and equal arms on their own are not enough. Together they are exactly enough, which is why those are the two things written on the skeleton.
Now the curves, and here something changes. The big lobe has to start at one arm top and finish at the other. That fixes two points on it, and two points do not fix an arc. Set the centre just below the gap and the radius comes out at twenty-five, and the lobe rises to thirty-eight. Push the centre lower and the radius grows to twenty-six, then thirty, then forty, while the lobe gets flatter every time, topping out at thirty-six, then thirty-two, then twenty-eight.
Each of those passes through both arm tops. Each of them is a real arch. The one thing not allowed is a radius under twenty-four, which cannot reach both ends at once. So the skeleton is exact and the curve is a choice, and there is no single correct radius to go hunting for. The pointed one is built differently, and more simply. Here is the opening it has to cross, and nothing else yet.
Put the compass point on one end of that opening, and open it all the way to the other end. Swing a long arc up and over. Now the same again from the other end, with the opening untouched. The two arcs cross once above the middle, and that crossing is the top of the arch. Each arc already runs from a foot up to that crossing, so there is nothing left to draw.
Two things about that shape are worth stopping on. A half circle on this same opening would rise to half of it, and stop. The pointed one goes well past that, standing on exactly the same two feet. And the top is a genuine corner rather than a smooth dome, because the two curves arrive there from different directions. Now look at what you actually drew. The opening across the bottom, and a reach from each end of it up to the top.
Three lengths, all the same, because one compass opening made every one of them. Every construction up to here has grown out of a single angle: the right angle. It falls out of the line that cuts a segment in half and stands square to it. Halve that and you have forty-five. But there is a whole family of shapes those cannot reach. A triangle with three equal sides. A six-sided ring. A flower with six petals.
All of them want sixty degrees, and nothing built so far produces one. And sixty turns out to be the cheapest angle you will ever construct. Here is the ray the angle will sit on, and here is the corner it starts from. Put the compass point on the corner and open it to anything you like. Swing an arc. It cuts the ray, and that cut becomes your second centre.
Do not change the opening. Move the point onto that cut and swing again. The two arcs meet at a point above the ray. Rule a line from the corner out through the place where they met. That angle is sixty degrees, and nothing was measured anywhere in it. Why sixty, though, and why exactly sixty? Look at the triangle you built without meaning to. Corner to cut: that is the opening.
Corner to the meeting point: the opening again, because the first arc put it there. Cut to the meeting point: the opening once more, because the second arc put it there. Three sides the same length. And a triangle with three equal sides has three equal angles. Three equal angles sharing a half turn between them, and a half turn split three ways is sixty. One thing has to be right, and it is not the size of the opening.
The opening can be anything. Tiny, enormous, it makes no difference to the answer. What matters is that the second swing uses the same one as the first. Change it, and the third side stops matching the other two, and the angle moves with it. Open the second arc to twice the first, and the triangle flattens onto the ray completely. Open it wider than that, and the two arcs never meet, so there is nothing to rule a line to.
One opening, used twice. That is the entire cost of sixty degrees. And once you have sixty, more of it comes free. Sit it on a straight line, and the other side of that line is a hundred and twenty. Halve the sixty and you have thirty. Halve that and you have fifteen. Which is a good moment to look back at how few things all of this started from.
A right angle, and a sixty. Halve them, add them, take one from the other, and you reach forty-five, and a hundred and twenty, and thirty, and fifteen, and a great many more besides. You never land on forty. Or on fifty, or on seventy. You can creep towards forty for ever, and the miss keeps halving, from two and a half degrees to one and a quarter to a little over half a degree, and it never closes.
One opening, swung twice. That is where all of it started.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- Copying an angle, and why triangle congruence proves it worksClass 7 · Ch 6, Constructions and Tilings
- Bisecting an angle, and halving 90° to get 45°Class 7 · Ch 6, Constructions and Tilings
- The perpendicular bisector, and the equidistance property that justifies itClass 7 · Ch 6, Constructions and Tilings
Comes up again in
- Regular hexagons, and why the angles round a point must total 360°Class 7 · Ch 6, Constructions and Tilings