Commutative and associative: why order and grouping are free

These teaching notes are for members

What the video covers, what to say before it, where a class usually goes wrong, and what to set afterwards. An account is free, and it opens every chapter of every book.

Create a free account Sign in

What to assume they know

Every expression can be rewritten as a sum of terms — an expression re-set as a sum of terms
Class 6 integers: adding and subtracting negative numbers
Class 6 token model of integers, which this section repeatedly appeals to
Vertical addition of a column of four- and five-digit numbers

What they should be able to do

State that swapping two terms of a sum leaves the total alone, and that this is named the commutative property of addition
State that regrouping the terms of a sum leaves the total alone, and that this is named the associative property of addition
Distinguish the two properties from one another rather than merging them
Explain why the freedom applies only after subtractions have been rewritten as additions of inverses
Test both claims on expressions containing negative terms, and say why the chapter insists on that test
Use the properties to shorten a real calculation, rather than only to state a law
Give an everyday process where order matters and one where it does not, and say what distinguishes them

Where it usually goes wrong

"Commutativity lets you move any number anywhere in an expression." It lets you reorder the terms of a sum. 6 – 4 becomes reorderable only once it has been rewritten as 6 + (–4), and then what moves is −4, sign included.
"So 6 – 4 equals 4 – 6." This is the exact error the property invites, and the drone example is the place to kill it: the two terms are 6 and −4, and swapping them gives (–4) + 6, not 4 – 6.
"Commutative and associative are two words for the same thing." One is about the order the terms sit in; the other is about which of them are added to each other first. The chapter names them in one sentence.
"It works for positive numbers, so obviously it works for all of them." The chapter refuses this step. It states the positive case as already known and then asks, twice, for the negative case to be checked. Treat the check as part of the mathematics, not as revision.
"Order never matters in mathematics." Subtraction and division are the counter-cases inside the subject, and socks-before-shoes is the counter-case outside it. The chapter puts the everyday one on the page for a reason.
"Order always matters — you must work strictly left to right." The opposite error, and the one Manasa's column is designed to expose: a student who believes it will re-add all five numbers.

Questions to check understanding

Rewrite an expression as a sum of terms and add the terms in two different orders, showing the totals agree
Given a long addition with one entry added late, say whether the earlier work can be reused
Identify which of several rearrangements of a given expression are legitimate and which quietly change a sign (Part I, p.38 and p.44 exercise sets)
Name the property that justifies a stated step
Give an everyday sequence in which order matters and one in which it does not, and explain the difference

Examples worth working on the board

Example 6 — the drone (Part I, §2.2, p.29). Madhu flies a drone from a terrace: 6 m up, then 4 m down. The height above the terrace is 6 – 4, and the chapter re-sets this as two terms, 6 and −4. It then swaps them and asks whether the total moved. Both arrangements are printed with the same total.
The two-term schematic (p.30). A general picture: term one plus term two, set equal to term two plus term one. The chapter reaches this only after the drone case and after asking the student to check further examples.
The three-term expression (p.30): (–7) + 10 + (–11). It is printed twice, once with a loop drawn round the first two terms and once with a loop round the last two. The chapter then asks a third question — what if the two negative terms are added to each other first — and reports that every order lands on −8.
Two open questions the chapter deliberately leaves open (pp.29–31): whether the swapping and the grouping results still hold once negative terms are present, and why they hold, argued from the Class 6 token model. The chapter asks for the first to be checked twice (pp.29–30) and poses the second three times, and answers neither in print. The explanation should put them to the student, not resolve them as though the book had.
Manasa's column (p.31). A handwritten list of five numbers — 1342, 774, 8611, 9055 and 1022 — of which she added only four, taking five minutes and reaching 11749; the one she left out is the fourth, 9055. The question printed is whether she has to start over. Check available to the explanation: the four she did add really do total 11749, so the example is internally consistent and the properties genuinely rescue her.
Evaluating with products present (p.31). Two printed evaluations, both reached by settling each term and then adding: 30 + 5 × 4 gives 30 and 20; 5 × (3 + 2) + 7 × 8 + 3 gives 25, 56 and 3.
Hat and shoes, socks and shoes (pp.31–32). Manasa is told to put on a hat and shoes — either order leaves her looking the same. Then socks and shoes — and now the order decides whether the outfit works. Two illustrations accompany this on p.31.

Figures to have open

The grouping loops (Part I, p.30). The three-term expression printed twice, each term in its own ring, with a larger loop drawn round two of the three rings — the first pair in one printing, the last pair in the other. Redraw. Checked against p.30; the loops are drawn in a second colour and are the only thing distinguishing the two printings.
The two-term and three-term schematics (Part I, p.30), written with the words "term one", "term two", "term three" in the rings rather than numbers. Redraw; they are the chapter's statement of the general claim.
Manasa's column (Part I, p.31), set in a handwritten face beside the question. The explanation needs the five numbers legible and the omitted one identifiable by position, since the whole point is that it can be appended.
The hat and socks illustrations (Part I, pp.31–32). Two drawings of the same child. Redraw; only the argument is needed, not the artwork.
The drone needs a simple two-arrow schematic, which is added here — the textbook prints no drone picture on p.29. Confirmed against the printed that page.

Where this sits in the book

NCERT Ganita Prakash, Class 7, Part I, printed Chapter 2 "Arithmetic Expressions", §2.2 "Reading and Evaluating Complex Expressions". Two unnumbered subheadings carry this topic: "Swapping and Grouping", pp.29–31, and "Swapping the Order of Things in Everyday Life", pp.31–32. The two property names and Manasa's column are on p.31.
Chapter SUMMARY, Part I, p.44 — the fourth bullet names both properties again and ties them to the sum-of-terms rewriting.
Backward pointer: Class 6 Ganita Prakash, token model of integers.
Forward pointer: Part II, printed Chapter 2 "Operations with Integers", §2.2, where the same properties are restated for the integers, and Part I, printed Chapter 4 §4.2, where they are carried into algebra.