PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 6 Mathematics · Chapter 2, Lines and Angles
Chapter 2 · Lines and Angles
Straight and right angles as the landmarks of a full turn
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google12 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
A right angle isn't “a corner that looks square”. It is exactly half a straight angle — and the word exactly is earned by folding paper, not by looking.
The idea
A right angle is not "the corner of a page" and not "an angle that looks square". It is defined as precisely half a straight angle, which is itself precisely half of a full turn — and the chapter earns the word precisely by folding paper rather than by eye, because a fold bringing one arm onto the other proves the two halves equal instead of merely suggesting it. That chain of halvings gives two fixed marks on the range of possible turns, and with those two marks in place every angle can be sorted into three groups before a single degree is named.
What you should be able to do
- Recognise a half turn as the angle whose arms lie in one straight line
- Name that angle and mark it in a figure
- Show that any ray from the vertex of a straight angle splits it into two angles
- Fold a straight angle into two equal parts and justify why the two parts are equal
- Define a right angle as precisely half a straight angle, and hence as a quarter of a full turn
- State how many right angles a straight angle contains
- Identify perpendicular lines and produce a pair by folding
- Produce straight and right angles by joining points on a square dot grid
- Sort angles into acute, right and obtuse using only the two landmarks
- Count acute angles in a growing figure and describe the pattern
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| straight angle | the angle made by a half turn, whose two arms lie in one line | §2.8, p.27 — printed in bold there |
| right angle | precisely half a straight angle | §2.8, p.29 — printed in bold there |
| perpendicular | said of a pair of lines crossing at right angles | §2.8, p.29 — printed in bold there |
| full turn | one complete rotation of an arm back to where it began | §2.8, p.27 — printed there |
| half turn | half of a full rotation | §2.8, p.27 — printed there |
| quarter turn | a quarter of a full rotation | §2.8, p.31 — printed there, in the acute and obtuse descriptions |
| crease | the straight fold line that a folded sheet keeps | §2.8, p.28 — printed there |
| acute angle | an angle smaller than a right angle | §2.8, p.31 — printed in bold there |
| obtuse angle | an angle larger than a right angle but smaller than a straight angle | §2.8, p.31 — printed in bold there |
| landmark | a fixed reference value that other angles are described against | an added term — not printed in this chapter |
Where people slip up
- "A right angle is an angle that looks square." Corrected in §2.8, p.29 — the definition is precisely half a straight angle, and the chapter says outright that nothing less than exact counts. The 'L' shape is a recognition aid, not the definition.
- "A straight angle is not really an angle, because it is just a line." It is the angle of a half turn; the arms are still two rays from one vertex, and the curve at O in Fig. 2.11 is drawn precisely to make that visible.
- "Any ray through the vertex splits a straight angle into two right angles." False, and section 4 is built on the gap: any ray splits it into two angles, but only one particular ray splits it into two equal ones.
- "Folding is a rough method; measuring would be exact." The reverse is the chapter's position at §2.8, pp.28–29 — the fold brings one arm onto the other, which is superimposition, so the equality is proved rather than estimated. No protractor has been introduced at this point in the chapter.
- "Perpendicular means vertical." It is a relation between two lines, not an orientation. Corrected by the slanting-crease exercise at §2.8, p.31, where the right angles are produced on a deliberately tilted fold.
- "Acute and obtuse are just labels to memorise." The two words carry their ordinary meanings — the chapter asks the student directly why the sharp one and the blunt one were chosen (§2.8, p.32).
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers to this chapter’s exercises · this video explains Figure it Out · 4 Q1, Figure it Out · 4 Q2, Figure it Out · 4 Q3, Figure it Out · 4 Q4, Figure it Out · 5 Q1, Figure it Out · 5 Q2, Figure it Out · 5 Q3, Figure it Out · 5 Q4
Transcript1,837 words
Back to the book, one last time. Your book draws two extreme cases, and they're the two that matter. In the first, the cover has been turned all the way over, right round onto the back, so you can hold the book in one hand. The cover started on top of the base. It ended up underneath. That's a full turn's worth of opening. In the second, the cover is laid open flat on the table.
Stop there, because that one is about to become important. Flat on the table is exactly halfway. The cover has gone half as far round as it could. So: a half turn. And a half turn has a particular look to it, which is what the whole video comes out of. Look at what the book looks like when it's flat. The cover points one way. The base points the other way. And the two of them are in one straight line.
The hinge is still the vertex. The cover and the base are still the two arms. It's still an angle. It just happens to be the angle where the arms have been flattened out until they point in exactly opposite directions. And that has a name. It's called a straight angle. Now, some people object to that. They say: that's just a line, that isn't an angle at all. But it is. There's a vertex. There are two rays leaving it, in opposite directions. That's the definition, and it's satisfied.
What's different is only that the turn happens to be a half turn, so the arms end up collinear. The straight angle is your first landmark. Remember it. Your book draws it, and the drawing is worth looking at properly. Three points on one line: A, then O in the middle, then B. Arrowheads at both ends. And then, at O, a curve. That curve is doing something quite sly. Without it, you'd read that picture as a line and nothing else.
With it, the same ink is a line and an angle at the same time. The curve tells you which reading is wanted. So the angle is written angle A O B, exactly as before. O in the middle, because O is the vertex. One picture, two readings. That's the hinge of this whole section. Now let's do something to it. Take the straight angle A O B, and draw one more ray from O, going upwards. Call the point on it C.
What have you made? Two angles, where there was one. Angle A O C on this side, and angle C O B on that side. And whatever else changes, those two always add up to the straight angle. That's just what cutting something in two means. Now move the ray. Tilt it over towards A. Still two angles. One got smaller, one got bigger, and they still add to the straight angle.
Tilt it the other way. Same story. So: any ray from O splits a straight angle into two angles. Any ray at all. That part's easy. Here's the harder question, and it's the one the section is actually about. Can you place the ray so that the two pieces are equal? And I want you to notice that this is a real question, not an obvious one. Because almost every ray gives you two unequal pieces. Nearly all of them are wrong.
You want the one position where the piece on the left is exactly the same angle as the piece on the right. Now, you could try it by eye. Nudge the ray until it looks even. But looks even isn't good enough here, and your book is quite firm about that. We're about to define something on top of this, and if the halving is only approximately right, everything built on it is only approximately right.
So we need to actually prove the two halves are equal. Not estimate. Prove. And we don't have a protractor. We haven't invented degrees yet. So here's what your book does instead. It folds the paper. Take a rectangular sheet. Along one edge, mark three points: A at one end, B at the other, and O somewhere in between. That edge, from A through O to B, is a straight angle at O. The edge of the paper is doing the work of the line.
Now fold the sheet, hinging it at O, so that the arm O B comes down exactly on top of the arm O A. Line them up carefully. Edge on edge. Then press the fold flat. Now open it out again. There's a crease. It runs from O, up across the sheet, and it wasn't there before. And that crease is the ray you were looking for. Now — why does that settle it? Why is folding a proof rather than a guess?
Think about what the fold actually did. It took the angle on one side of the crease and laid it down on top of the angle on the other side. Vertex on vertex, because you hinged at O. Arm on arm, because you lined up O B with O A. That is superimposition. That's the exact test from last video. And they matched. Nothing stuck out on either side. So the two angles aren't approximately equal, or equal as far as you can tell. They are equal, and the fold is the reason.
Which is a nice reversal, isn't it. Folding sounds rougher than measuring. Here it's the other way round — the fold is exact, and the eye was the estimate. So now we can define the thing. Each of those two equal pieces is called a right angle. And read that definition carefully, because it's not the one most people carry around. A right angle is precisely half a straight angle. That's it. That's the whole definition.
It isn't an angle that looks square. It isn't the corner of a page. Those are ways of recognising one, and they're useful, but they aren't what it means. The corner of a page is a right angle because the page was cut that way — not the other way round. And now turn the definition around, because that's where it gets useful. If a right angle is half a straight angle, then a straight angle is exactly two right angles.
Two of them, side by side, arms flattened out into one line. Every time. Let's stack up what we've got, because they're all the same thing measured in different bites. A full turn brings the arm all the way back to where it started. A half turn is half of that, and it gives you the straight angle. And a right angle is half of the half. So a right angle is a quarter of a full turn.
Quarter, half, whole. Those are your landmarks, and there still isn't a number anywhere. You already recognise the quarter turn, by the way. It's the shape of a capital L. It's the corner of a door frame, the corner of a window, the corner of this screen. It's everywhere in built things, because things that stack and stand tend to be built on quarter turns. Now, one more word, and it comes from what happens if you extend both arms.
Take a right angle, and push each arm out past the vertex, into a full line. You've now got two lines crossing at that point, and four angles round the crossing. And here's the thing — all four of them are right angles. When two lines cross like that, we say they are perpendicular. Now, a warning, because this catches people out. Perpendicular does not mean vertical. It isn't about upright, and it isn't about the page.
It's a relation between two lines: it says how they meet, not which way they point. Tilt the whole picture over. Spin it round. Both lines are now slanting. They're still perpendicular, because the four angles at the crossing are still right angles. Nothing about the crossing changed. Your book then sets a puzzle on a grid of dots, and the puzzle is a good one because the hint is the whole method.
You've got a square grid. A dot is marked A, and another is marked B. First task: make a straight angle at A. That means finding a line through A that hits grid dots on both sides of it. And there's a move for that. Take the segment from B to A, and just keep going — extend it past A until you land on another dot. Call it C.
Now A has dots on both sides of it, in one straight line. Angle B A C is a straight angle. Second task, and this is the clever bit: make a right angle at A. You already know how. A right angle is half a straight angle. You've got a straight angle sitting right there. So find the line through A that halves it. And on a square grid you can do that exactly, without folding anything, because the grid gives you the perpendicular direction for free.
If your segment went across three and up one, the perpendicular goes across one and down three. Swap the steps, flip one sign. Try it. That's a rule you'll meet again in a few years with a lot more machinery around it. And now, with two landmarks fixed, you can sort every angle there is, still without a single number. Smaller than a right angle: your book calls those acute.
Exactly a right angle: that's its own group, right in the middle. Bigger than a right angle, but smaller than a straight angle: obtuse. And your book asks you a question about those two words that I like a lot. Why those words? Acute, in ordinary English, means sharp. And a small angle is a sharp point. Obtuse means blunt. And a wide angle is a blunt corner. So they're not arbitrary labels to memorise. They're descriptions, and they're descriptions of exactly the right thing.
Now here's yours, and it's from the end of the section. Draw a triangle. Count its acute angles — there are three, one at each corner. Now join the midpoints of its three sides. That puts a smaller upside-down triangle inside it. Count the acute angles now: there are twelve. Do it once more, inside that middle triangle, and there are twenty-one. Three, twelve, twenty-one. So how many in the next one? And more importantly — why does it go up by nine each time?
Here's a hint: every new stage puts three new points onto lines that were already there, and each of those points has two new rays leaving it. Work out how many new acute angles each new point brings, and the nine will explain itself. Comments below. Next time: we finally put numbers on those landmarks, and find out why anybody would cut a full turn into three hundred and sixty pieces.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- An angle is an amount of turn, not a pair of drawn armsClass 6 · Ch 2, Lines and Angles
- Comparing two angles without measuring either of themClass 6 · Ch 2, Lines and Angles
- Line and ray: what changes when you refuse to stopClass 6 · Ch 2, Lines and Angles
Comes up again in
- The degree: why a full turn was cut into 360 equal partsClass 6 · Ch 2, Lines and Angles
- Reading and drawing an angle with a protractorClass 6 · Ch 2, Lines and Angles
- Acute, obtuse and reflex: one classification covering every angleClass 6 · Ch 2, Lines and Angles
- The two properties that define a rectangle, and the one more a square needsClass 6 · Ch 8, Playing with Constructions
- An angle of symmetry: turning a figure onto itselfClass 6 · Ch 9, Symmetry