PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 10 Mathematics · Chapter 4, Quadratic EquationsPrepShorts

Chapter 4 · Quadratic Equations

The shape an equation has to have before it counts as quadratic

Recognising and forming one14 min

This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.

Sign in with Google

14 min.

Being quadratic is not something you can SEE. It is a property an equation has after it has been tidied, and two of the equations here change their answer the moment you do the arithmetic: one with an x2 on both sides that turns out to be linear, one with a cube on both sides that turns out to be quadratic. Over 1980 equations, 712 of them look quadratic and are not.

The idea

Being quadratic is a property an equation has after you tidy it, never a property of how it happens to be written. So the test has to be a procedure and not a glance: gather everything onto one side, collect like powers, and then ask whether an x² survives with a coefficient that is not zero and nothing of higher degree survives at all. The chapter proves the glance untrustworthy by supplying two failures in opposite directions inside one worked example — an equation that shows an x² on both sides and loses it, and an equation of visible degree three that loses its cube and turns out quadratic after all.

What you should be able to do

  • State the four conditions the standard form imposes: one variable, real coefficients, highest power exactly two, and a leading coefficient that is not zero
  • Explain why allowing the leading coefficient to be zero would destroy the definition, and say what the equation becomes instead
  • Recognise a quadratic equation written with its terms out of order, and rewrite it in standard form by arranging the powers downwards
  • Given an equation with brackets or powers on both sides, expand, collect and cancel, and then decide whether what remains is quadratic
  • Identify a, b and c, with their signs, from an equation already in standard form
  • Explain why an equation whose two sides both carry x² may still fail to be quadratic, using item (ii) of the chapter's Example 2
  • Explain why an equation whose two sides both carry x³ may nevertheless be quadratic, using item (iv) of that same Example 2
  • Sort the eight items of Exercise 4.1 Question 1 into quadratic and not, giving the simplified equation as the evidence in each case

Words to know

TermDefinition in one lineFirst introduced
quadratic equationan equation that tidies to a polynomial of degree two set equal to zeroprinted in this chapter (§4.1 title and §4.2, pp. 38–39)
quadratic polynomialthe expression ax² + bx + c with a not zero, before it is equated to anythingprinted in this chapter (§4.1, p. 38); studied in Chapter 2
standard formthe arrangement with powers running downwards and everything on one side of the equals signprinted in this chapter (§4.2, p. 39)
degreethe highest power of the variable that actually survives in an expressionprinted in this chapter (§4.2, p. 39; and in the Remark on p. 41)
real numbera number on the number line — the only kind the coefficients are allowed to be hereprinted in this chapter (§4.2, p. 39)
cubic equationan equation whose degree is three, named in the chapter's Remark as what item (iv) resemblesprinted in this chapter (Remark, p. 41)
LHS, RHSthe left and right sides of an equation, named separately because the chapter compares them before cancellingpp. 40–41 print only the first of the pair, in Example 2 items (i), (iii) and (iv); the second is printed once in the chapter, at §4.3, p. 42
leading coefficientthe number multiplying the highest power — here the a of ax² + bx + can added term; not printed in this chapter, which says "a" and states the condition on it directly
like termsterms carrying the same power of x, which is what makes cancellation possiblean added phrasing; not printed in this chapter

Where people slip up

  • "It has an x², so it is quadratic." Item (ii) of Example 2 has an x² on both sides and is a linear equation. The x² has to survive the tidying.
  • "It has an x³, so it cannot be quadratic." Item (iv) has cubes on both sides and they cancel exactly. Degree is what is left, not what was written.
  • "Standard form is just neatness." It is the form in which a, b and c can be read off at all, and every later tool in the chapter — factorising, the discriminant, the formula — takes a, b and c as its input.
  • "a can be any number." If a is zero the x² term is gone and the definition no longer applies; what remains is a linear equation. This is not a technicality — Exercise 4.3 Question 2(ii) turns on exactly this point.
  • "b or c must be present." They need not be. An equation such as −x² + 301 = 0 has no x term at all and is still quadratic.
  • "The coefficients have to be whole numbers." The definition asks only that they be real, and Exercise 4.2 supplies items with √2 and with ⅛ as coefficients.
  • "Dividing the whole equation by 6 changes the problem." Multiplying or dividing an equation by a number that is not zero leaves exactly the same set of solutions, which is why the chapter is free to reduce 6x² + 12x + 12 = 0.
Transcript1,878 words

A trust wants to carpet the floor of a hall. The carpet is to cover three hundred square metres, and the hall is to be one metre longer than twice its breadth. One number is unknown, so give it a name. Let the breadth be x metres. Then the length is not a second unknown. It is two x plus one. That is the modelling step, and it is the only place any thinking is required.

The area is the breadth times the length: x times, bracket, two x plus one. Multiply it out and you get two x squared plus x. So the condition is two x squared plus x equals three hundred. Move the three hundred across and everything is on one side: two x squared plus x minus three hundred equals nought. That equation has a name, and the whole of this video is about what the name means.

You have met the expression before. A quadratic polynomial is anything of the form a x squared plus b x plus c, with a not nought. Two x squared plus x minus three hundred is exactly that, with a equal to two, b equal to one and c equal to minus three hundred. An expression is not an equation. It does not say anything until you set it equal to something.

Set a quadratic polynomial equal to nought, and what you have is a quadratic equation. That is the whole definition, and everything else in this video is learning to apply it honestly. The standard form is a x squared plus b x plus c equals nought, and it pins down four separate things. One letter, and one only. An equation in two letters is a different kind of object. The coefficients a, b and c are real numbers. Not necessarily whole numbers — root two is a perfectly good coefficient, and so is an eighth.

The highest power of the letter that survives is exactly two. Not at most two, and not at least two. Exactly two. And a, the number multiplying x squared, is not nought. Those last two conditions are the ones that do the work, and they are the two people forget. Notice also what is NOT required. b may be nought, and so may c. Minus x squared plus three hundred and one equals nought has no x term in it at all, and it is a perfectly good quadratic equation.

Take that last condition seriously for a moment. Why can a not be nought? Because if it is, there is no x squared term. It is not that the equation becomes awkward. It is that it becomes a different kind of equation. Watch what happens to a x squared plus five x plus six equals nought as a runs through the values minus three up to three. For every value except one, you have a quadratic. For a equal to nought, the x squared term vanishes and five x plus six equals nought is left, which is linear.

That was swept rather than asserted: seven values of a, six of them leaving degree two and exactly one leaving degree one. So the condition is not a technicality. It is what stops the definition from covering everything. Now, standard form is a form. Plenty of quadratic equations do not arrive in it. Four x minus three x squared plus two equals nought is quadratic. Its powers are simply written in the wrong order.

Arrange them downwards and it reads minus three x squared plus four x plus two equals nought, so a is minus three, b is four and c is two. Notice that a is negative, and that is allowed. The condition is that a is not nought, not that a is positive. One minus x squared plus three hundred equals nought is quadratic too. Collect the constants and it is minus x squared plus three hundred and one equals nought.

Here b is nought, which the definition permits, and c is three hundred and one, which it does not object to either. Rewriting in standard form is not tidiness. It is the only arrangement in which a, b and c can be read off at all, and every tool that comes later takes those three numbers as its input. Which brings us to the working order, and it is the whole point of the topic.

You cannot tell whether an equation is quadratic by looking at it. You have to tidy it first, and then look. Expand every bracket. Collect the like powers. Move everything onto one side. Then, and only then, ask what the highest surviving power is. The word doing the work there is SURVIVING. An x squared that cancels is not there. An x cubed that cancels is not there either. Degree is a property of what is left, not of what was written down.

There are exactly two ways to be caught out by this, and they point in opposite directions. Both are worth seeing. Here is the first. x times, bracket, x plus one, close bracket, plus eight, equals, bracket, x plus two, times, bracket, x minus two. There is an x squared on the left. There is an x squared on the right. Every instinct says quadratic. Tidy it. The left side is x squared plus x plus eight.

The right side is a difference of two squares: x squared minus four. Now subtract. The x squared terms are identical, so they go. What is left is x plus twelve equals nought. Degree one. This is a linear equation, and it has exactly one answer, minus twelve. A glance said two. The tidying said one. The tidying is right, because the x squared did not survive. And here is the opposite mistake. Bracket, x plus two, close bracket, cubed, equals x cubed minus four.

There is a cube on both sides, so surely this cannot be quadratic. Expand the left. x plus two, all cubed, is x cubed plus six x squared plus twelve x plus eight. Subtract the right side. The x cubed terms are identical, and they cancel exactly. Six x squared plus twelve x plus twelve equals nought. Degree two. It is quadratic, and the cube on each side had nothing to do with it.

You may divide right through by six, because multiplying or dividing an equation by a number that is not nought moves no answer. x squared plus two x plus two equals nought. That was checked rather than assumed, over three equations and a grid of points, against a scaling by nought that moves plenty. Eight equations, and the job is to sort them. For each one, tidy first and judge second.

The first tidies to x squared plus seven equals nought. Quadratic, and with no x term at all. The second gives x squared minus four x plus six. Quadratic. The third has an x squared on each side, and both of them go. Minus three x plus one is left. Not quadratic. The fourth gives x squared minus ten x minus three, and the fifth x squared minus eleven x plus eight. Both quadratic.

In the sixth the squares cancel and seven x minus three remains. Not quadratic. Now the sharpest pair in the list, and they sit next to each other on purpose. Both of them start with a cube on each side. In the seventh the cubes do NOT cancel: one side has x cubed and the other has two x cubed. Minus x cubed plus six x squared plus fourteen x plus eight remains. Degree three, so not quadratic.

In the eighth they DO cancel, and two x squared minus thirteen x plus nine is left. Quadratic. Five of the eight are quadratic. Two of them look quadratic and are not. And the only way to know which is which was to do the arithmetic. One last thing, because this shape of question is very old. The Babylonians could find two numbers from their sum and their product, which is exactly the equation x squared minus p x plus q equals nought.

Ask for two numbers adding to seven and multiplying to twelve and you are asking for x squared minus seven x plus twelve to be nought. The answer is three and four. Euclid did the same problem as one about lengths, geometrically. Brahmagupta set down a rule for the type a x squared plus b x equals c, which is quadratic the moment you move the c across. Al-Khwarizmi worked through the several types systematically.

Sridharacharya is credited with the formula reached by completing the square — the one this subject still uses. And Abraham bar Hiyya Ha-Nasi published complete solutions in Europe. Different places, different centuries, and the same shape of question every time. A word on the checking, because the claim here is unusually easy to confirm without testing anything. For most equations, what a glance sees and what survives agree, so a checker reading the degree off the written form would look right almost everywhere.

So both questions were asked, of every equation, and the answers filed together as a pair. Nearly two thousand equations were built by putting products of small factors on each side. Each was asked what the higher of the two sides' degrees is, before anything cancels, and then what the degree is after everything is moved to one side and collected. The diagonal of that table is the equations that look like what they are, and it is well populated.

But so are the two cells the topic exists for. Seven hundred and twelve equations show an x squared on both sides and are not quadratic. Forty-four show a cube on both sides and are. Both of those had to be full. A checker reading the degree off the written form empties them; so does one that stopped looking at the written form at all. The degree itself was found twice, by routes that share no arithmetic.

One expands the expression and counts coefficients. The other never builds a polynomial at all: it evaluates the expression at nought, one, two, three and so on, and takes differences until they vanish, which is a fact about the function rather than about how it is written. They agreed on every equation. And beside them ran a third route that forgets the cross terms when it multiplies out, which disagreed on seven hundred and twelve of them — which is what makes the other two agreeing worth anything.

A quadratic equation is a quadratic polynomial set equal to nought. In standard form: a x squared plus b x plus c equals nought, one letter, real coefficients, highest surviving power exactly two, and a not nought. b may be nought. c may be nought. a may not. The powers may arrive in any order, and a may be negative. Neither of those stops it being quadratic. And the test is never a glance. Expand, collect, move everything to one side, and then ask what is left.

An x squared on both sides can vanish, and then it was never quadratic. A cube on both sides can vanish, and then it was. Degree is what survives.

Where this fits

Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.

Comes up again in

Either side of this one

The book

Open in a new tab