PrepShorts · Study sheet · Class 10 Mathematics · Chapter 11, Areas Related to Circles
Chapter 11 · Areas Related to Circles
A segment as what is left when the triangle is taken away
This video could not be loaded. Reload the page to try again.
Sign in with Google14 min.
Keep your place in this chapter — sign in, it’s free.Sign in
Halve the angle and the wedge halves. Halve the angle and the piece past the chord does not - it drops to less than a seventh. That one collapse is why the share-of-the-turn argument stops dead here, and what replaces it is a subtraction that is exact, not approximate.
The idea
The share-of-the-turn argument stops dead at the segment, and the chapter's handling of that is the most instructive thing in the chapter. A segment's area is simply not proportional to its angle: on a circle of radius 21 cm the piece cut off by a 120° chord measures about 271 cm², and halving the angle to 60° leaves about 40 cm² — a seventh, not a half. So no unitary route can reach it. What reaches it instead is a decomposition. Join the ends of the arc to the centre and the wedge falls into exactly two pieces, the segment and the triangle, with nothing overlapping and nothing left over — so the segment must be the wedge minus the triangle, for every angle, with no approximation anywhere. That one subtraction is also the reason this is the first area in the chapter that needs trigonometry: the wedge half of it scales with the angle, and the triangle half of it does not.
What you should be able to do
- Explain why the sector argument cannot be re-run for a segment
- Decompose a sector into a segment and a triangle, and justify that the two pieces cover it exactly once
- Compute a segment's area as the difference of a sector's area and a triangle's
- Justify that the perpendicular dropped from the centre to a chord bisects both the chord and the angle, using the congruence the chapter names
- Use the half-angle and the radius to obtain the chord and the height of the triangle
- Compute a major segment, and say why it is not the sector minus the triangle
- Check a segment result at the straight-angle case, where the triangle vanishes
- Apply the same subtraction repeatedly in a composite figure, and carry the result into a cost
Words to know
| Term | Definition in one line | First introduced |
|---|---|---|
| segment | the piece of the disc between a chord and one of the arcs that chord cuts off | printed in §11.1, p. 154; measured from p. 156 |
| minor segment | the smaller of the pair, and what a bare "segment" means here under the Remark on p. 154 | printed in §11.1, p. 154 |
| major segment | the larger of the pair, obtained on p. 156 by taking the minor one out of the whole disc | printed in §11.1, p. 154, and given its own relation on p. 156 |
| chord | the straight edge of the segment, and the base of the triangle that is subtracted | printed in §11.1, p. 154, and named in four of Exercise 11.1's fourteen questions — 4, 5 (iii), 6 and 7, all on p. 158 |
| sector | the wedge the segment is carved out of | printed in §11.1, p. 154 |
| RHS congruence | the congruence criterion the chapter cites to pair the two halves of the triangle | printed on p. 157, inside the solution to Example 2 |
| mid-point | what the foot of the dropped segment turns out to be, giving half the chord | printed on p. 157 |
| foot of the perpendicular | the point M where the segment from the centre meets the chord at a right angle | an added wording; p. 157 marks the relation with the ⊥ symbol and names the point M without spelling the phrase out anywhere in this chapter |
| trigonometric ratio | sine or cosine of the half-angle, which is what supplies the triangle's two dimensions | an added term; not printed in this chapter, which simply writes cos 60° and sin 60° on p. 157 and relies on Chapter 8 |
Where people slip up
- "A segment is a sector, so it must scale with the angle too." It does not, and the 271-to-40 collapse above is the fastest way to feel it. The wedge scales; the triangle stubbornly does not, and at 60° and 120° on the same circle the triangle is the very same size.
- "The subtraction is an approximation, so the answer is approximate." The two pieces meet along the chord and cover the wedge exactly once. The only approximation anywhere in these questions is the value chosen for π, and for √3 when one is offered.
- "The triangle to subtract has the chord as one side and the arc as another." The triangle's three sides are two radii and the chord. It is bounded by straight lines only; if a curve has crept into it, the wrong region is being subtracted.
- "Major segment equals major sector minus the triangle." It is the major sector plus the triangle. The triangle sits on the major segment's side of the chord, not the minor one, and question 6 is built to punish the slip.
- "Use the full angle in the sine." The chapter's route halves the angle first, because the perpendicular from the centre splits the isosceles triangle into two right ones. Feeding 120° into a ratio table that stops at 90° is where students stall.
- "M is the mid-point because it looks like it." It is the mid-point because the two halves are congruent by RHS, and the same congruence is what halves the angle. Both facts come from one argument, and both are used.
- "Convert the surd to a decimal as soon as it appears." Example 2 carries √3 right to the end and factorises, and no value for √3 is offered there. Where the exercise wants a decimal it says which value to use — 1.73 in questions 6 and 7, and 1.7 in question 13, which are not the same number.
- "The six designs are sectors." They are the pieces left over between the straight sides and the rim, and the cost of confusing the two is far worse than it sounds. Six wedges of 60° are the whole cover — 2464 cm² against 464.8 cm² of design, over five times as much, and a bill of ₹862.40 against ₹162.68. A student who makes this substitution has not overshot slightly; they have quoted for covering the entire table.
Ask your teacher a person
Your teacher reads this and writes back, usually within a day. For an instant answer, use Ask the video in the sidebar.
Your class sees the question and the answer. Only your teacher sees that it was you.
No questions on this topic yet.
Worked answers: Exercise 11.1 · this video explains Exercise 11.1 Q4, Exercise 11.1 Q6, Exercise 11.1 Q7, Exercise 11.1 Q13
Transcript2,079 words
A circle of radius twenty one, and a chord across it opening a hundred and twenty degrees at the centre. The piece caught between that chord and the arc above it measures about two hundred and seventy one. Now halve the angle: sixty degrees, same circle, same kind of piece. If you expect about a hundred and thirty five, you are about to be wrong by a factor of three.
It measures about forty. Halving the angle did not halve the piece. It cut it to less than a seventh of what it was. So whatever argument gave us the wedge cannot be run again here. Be precise about what failed, because the wedge behaved perfectly: four hundred and sixty two at a hundred and twenty degrees, two hundred and thirty one at sixty. Exactly half, as promised. The piece we want sits inside that wedge. And between the two of them there is one other thing: a triangle, standing on the chord, with its point at the centre.
Watch that triangle as the angle halves. It does not halve. It does not change at all. That is the whole failure. One of the two pieces scales with the angle and the other does not. The picture that rescues this is almost too simple to be worth drawing. Take the arc, and join each of its two ends to the centre. You now have a wedge, and inside it, two pieces.
One is the piece past the chord: the arc on one side, the chord on the other. The other is a triangle - two radii and the chord, three straight edges and no curve anywhere. If a curve has crept into your triangle you are subtracting the wrong region, and that is the commonest way to get this wrong. The claim is that those two pieces are the wedge. Not roughly - exactly.
Exactly is a strong word, and two things have to be true for it: nothing counted twice, and nothing missed. So take every point of the wedge and ask which side of the chord it lies on. Past it, and the point belongs to the piece; on the centre's side, to the triangle. Not one point answers both. At nine angles, from fifteen degrees to a straight one, the count provably on both sides comes out at nought every time.
And what is left over is the chord itself: a line, which has length and no width, and which measured against the wedge it lies across comes to about two parts in ten thousand even at its worst. So the piece plus the triangle is the wedge, nothing overlapping and nothing left over, and therefore the piece is the wedge minus the triangle. No approximation entered anywhere. The only thing approximate in what follows is whatever number you decide to use for pi.
So the answer is a subtraction, and its two halves behave completely differently. Double the angle and the wedge doubles: six angles tried, and it doubles at every one of them. Double the angle and neither the piece past the chord nor the triangle doubles, at any of those six. The easy half is the wedge: its share of the turn, times the whole disc. The hard half is the triangle. Its size depends on the angle, but not in proportion to it.
In fact it climbs to the right angle and falls away again, which is behaviour no proportional quantity can have. That is why this is the first area here that needs trigonometry: not because circles are hard, but because that triangle is not a fixed fraction of anything. Come back to those two triangles, because something about them is easy to miss. The triangle at sixty degrees and the triangle at a hundred and twenty have the same area. Not roughly. The same.
Nor is it confined to those two. Every pair of angles that adds to a straight one gives two triangles of identical size: thirty and a hundred and fifty, forty five and a hundred and thirty five, seventy five and a hundred and five. But they are emphatically not the same triangle. At sixty degrees it is tall and narrow; at a hundred and twenty, short and wide. The chords differ and the heights differ.
Same area, different shape - which matters, because in a moment we build the triangle out of its chord and its height, and the area alone cannot tell those two apart at all. Now one all the way through, with the numbers we opened on. Radius twenty one, the chord opening a hundred and twenty degrees at the centre, pi taken as twenty two sevenths. The whole disc first: twenty two sevenths times twenty one squared. Twenty one squared is four hundred and forty one, seven goes into that sixty three times, so this is twenty two sixty threes. One thousand three hundred and eighty six.
The wedge is its share of the turn, and a hundred and twenty over three hundred and sixty is a third. A third of one thousand three hundred and eighty six is four hundred and sixty two. Easy half done. Now the triangle. The triangle has two sides of twenty one with a hundred and twenty degrees between them, and no obvious base and height. So drop a perpendicular from the centre onto the chord, and call where it lands the foot.
That splits the triangle into two right angled ones, and those two are congruent: they share the perpendicular, their long sides are both radii, and each has a right angle at the foot. Now read off two things, because that one congruence gives you both and you need both. First, the two halves of the chord are equal, so the foot is the middle of it. Second, the two halves of the angle at the centre are equal, so the perpendicular has bisected the angle.
The foot is not the middle because it looks like it. It is the middle because of that congruence, and the same congruence hands you the half angle. And the half angle is what makes a hundred and twenty degree problem workable, because sixty is an angle you have a ratio for. Take one of the two right triangles. Hypotenuse twenty one, and the angle at the centre sixty degrees, half of the hundred and twenty.
The side along the perpendicular is adjacent to that angle, so it is twenty one times the cosine of sixty. Cosine of sixty is a half, so the height is ten and a half. The side along the chord is opposite, so it is twenty one times the sine of sixty. Sine of sixty is root three over two, so that half is twenty one root three over two, and the whole chord is twenty one root three.
Notice the pattern under those two. The chord is twice the radius times the sine of the half angle, and the height is the radius times its cosine. That is general, and it is what turns a problem about an arc into one about a right triangle. Half the base times the height. Half of twenty one root three, times ten and a half. Twenty one root three over two, times twenty one over two, is four hundred and forty one root three over four.
So the piece we want is four hundred and sixty two minus four hundred and forty one root three over four. Stop there, and look at it rather than reaching for a calculator. Four hundred and sixty two is twenty one twenty twos, and four hundred and forty one is twenty one twenty ones. So twenty one over four comes out of both, leaving eighty eight minus twenty one root three. That is the answer, and it is exact.
If you are handed no value for root three, that is where you stop. Reaching for one point seven three two is not finishing the question, it is answering a different one - and it turns this into about two hundred and seventy one, which is the number we opened on. Here is a check that costs one line and catches a swapped ratio instantly. Push the angle out to a straight one, so the chord becomes a diameter.
The triangle's apex is now on the line its base sits on. It has flattened completely and measures nothing. And the piece past the chord is a semicircle, plainly half the disc. So at a straight angle the formula has to return the wedge with nothing taken off it, and it does - not by luck, but because the height is the radius times the cosine of the half angle, and the cosine of ninety is nought.
Every chord cuts the disc into two pieces, and the larger one is where nearly everybody slips. The reflex side has its own wedge, the big one, so surely the big piece is that big wedge minus the triangle? It is not. It is the big wedge plus the triangle, and the picture shows why. The triangle lies on the far side of the chord from the small piece - which is the same side as the large one. It is part of the large piece, so you add it.
Take a circle of radius fifteen, a chord opening sixty degrees, pi as three point one four and root three as one point seven three. The small wedge is a hundred and seventeen point seven five and the triangle is ninety seven point three one two five, so the small piece is twenty point four three seven five. Off the disc's seven hundred and six point five, that leaves six hundred and eighty six point zero six two five.
Now the other way. The large wedge is three hundred degrees' worth, five hundred and eighty eight point seven five, and adding the triangle back gives exactly that again. Subtract it instead and you are nearly two hundred short, at four hundred and ninety one point four three seven five. Two more, both quick, and both making a point. Radius ten, chord opening a right angle, pi as three point one four.
The wedge is a quarter of the disc, seventy eight point five, and the triangle needs no trigonometry at all: with a right angle at the centre the two radii are the base and the height, so half of ten times ten is fifty. The piece is twenty eight point five, and no ratio table was opened. Sixty degrees does the same favour differently: there the chord equals the radius, so the triangle is equilateral and reads straight off.
Finish with one that puts the whole thing to work. A round table cover, radius twenty eight, carrying six identical designs round its edge. The making costs thirty five cents a square centimetre, and root three is to be taken as one point seven. Note that number. The worked example used one point seven three two, and the last digits of an answer depend on which you were handed. Six equal chords round the circle means six equal angles at the centre, and six equal angles filling a full turn means sixty degrees each.
So each design is the piece past a chord opening sixty degrees on a radius of twenty eight: one subtraction, done six times. The wedge is a sixth of the disc, a sixth of two thousand four hundred and sixty four: four hundred and ten and two thirds. Sixty degrees, so the triangle is equilateral on a side of twenty eight, a hundred and ninety six root three, which at one point seven is three hundred and thirty three point two.
One design is seventy seven point four seven, six of them four hundred and sixty four point eight, and the bill a hundred and sixty two point six eight. Now the mistake worth naming. Read those six designs as six wedges instead of six pieces past chords and you get two thousand four hundred and sixty four, which is the entire cover: more than five times the real figure, and a bill of eight hundred and sixty two point four zero.
That is not being slightly generous. That is quoting for decorating the whole table. The wedge is the piece plus the triangle, and all of this comes down to knowing which of the three you were asked for.
Where this fits
Taken from the notes each video was made from, not from the reading order — these are the ideas this one rests on and the ones that later rest on it.
Builds on
- A sector's area as its share of the full turnClass 10 · Ch 11, Areas Related to Circles
- Sector versus segment, and which one major and minor refer toClass 10 · Ch 11, Areas Related to Circles
Either side of this one
- The arc's length by the same share argumentClass 10 · Ch 11, Areas Related to Circles
- Decomposing an everyday object into the basic solidsClass 10 · Ch 12, Surface Areas and Volumes